Alternative Pavements for Snowmobile Crossings14282D - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Alternative Pavements for Snowmobile Crossings14282D

Description:

Alternative Pavements for Snowmobile Crossings14282D – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: n42
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Alternative Pavements for Snowmobile Crossings14282D


1
Alternative Pavements for Snowmobile
Crossings-14282D
2
The Problem
  • Snowmobile trails cross the highways
  • Snowmobiles are equipped with accessories (studs
    and runners) for traction on ice
  • Studs and runners made of carbide steel damage
    our highways by gouging the sand/asphalt portion
    of the asphalt mix
  • WHY?

3
Dynamics of Snowmobile Traction
Skis have a high drag coefficient on pavement
Small contact area of track studs offers little
traction, but erodes asphalt and sand from HMA
pavement during acceleration
4
The Result?
5
This,
And
6
This,
And
7
This,
And
8
This,
9
Snowmobile Track Studs
  • Available in a variety of lengths
  • Normal steel, or
  • Carbon steel tips

10
Snowmobile Track Studs
11
Groomers
  • The groomer and drag equipment length totals 40
    feet
  • The equipment is heavy, 4 Tons for the groomer,
    2.5 for the Drag
  • It crosses the highways
  • Tracks are equipped with studs
  • Skid steering causes damage due to high point
    loads and sliding

12
Research Project Scope
  • Locate trail crossings with differing levels of
    snowfall and snowmobile traffic
  • Install two test products at each site
  • Install 1/2overlay of a typical HMA as a control
    surface
  • Monitor for two winters (now extended to three)
  • Document visual changes (photos)
  • Survey to measure wear compare with control
    areas
  • Count sleds to evaluate impact of traffic level

13
Typical DamageRoute 3 in Groveton
  • SB shoulder gravel was eroded
  • Pavement edge was broken from stud damage during
    snowmobile acceleration to cross highway.

14
Typical DamageRoute 3 in Groveton
  • Northbound shoulder gravel was eroded.
  • Pavement edge was broken
  • Pavement surface was worn from snowmobile studs.

15
Regarding Edge Wear
  • This type of wear is actually breakage due to
    erodion of shoulder gravel, exposed by plowing
    and de-icer action. It might be controlled by an
    apron extention leading 10 to 20 along the
    trail from the edge of pavement. This element
    was not a part of this project.

16
Cleanosol (a.k.a. Nor.skilt)
  • Thermoplastic product imported from Norway
  • Applied to any clean, dry surface
  • Heat material in kettle to 425o F
  • Transfer to walk-behind applicator

17
Installing Cleanosol
  • Material is placed in 12 wide strips
  • Strips are butted for smooth ride
  • Researh project application went from pavement
    edge to crown

18
Installing Cleanosol
  • Applied in 3 layers
  • Each layer offset to cover joint of previous
    layer
  • Creates a tapered approach

19
Installing Cleanosol
  • Single strip along edge covers ends to complete
    installation

20
Imprint
  • Thermosetting resin-based compound of fine-graded
    granite aggregate, reinforced with 2 types of
    fibers
  • Available in 12 colors
  • Inlaid installation
  • Heated in kettle to 400o F
  • Typically used for crosswalks and traffic calming
    applications

21
Installing Imprint
  • Transferred to surface by bucket
  • Applied by hand and spread with a heated 9 x 9
    iron
  • Completed surface is covered with sand

22
Installing Imprint
  • Completed red installation in Rumney
  • Gray installed in Errol and Groveton

23
Product ComparisonsCleanosol
Imprint
  • Installed by 2-man crew
  • Simple preparation
  • Constant thickness applied smooth finish
  • Matched existing shape of surface
  • Unit cost 18.00 / SF
  • Installed by 3-man crew
  • Inlay process requires more labor/cost
  • Uneven surface/ride due to hand application
  • Early cracking
  • Unit cost 6 / SF

24
Observations After First WinterCleanosol
Imprint
25
Observations After First WinterCleanosol
Imprint
26
Errol After Second WinterCleanosol
Control
27
Errol After Second WinterImprint
28
Findings To Date
  • Both materials are at least as durable as the
    control surfaces. Wear patterns are similar.
  • Imprint was not originally intended for this
    application. Higher cost and uneven surface were
    negatives.
  • Cleanosol could be used for a trail crossing
    maintenance program
  • Apply only after new pavement is damaged
  • Re-apply as worn in heavy sled traffic areas
  • Overlay as part of overall pavement program
  • Edge breakage is an equal problem to surface wear.

29
QUESTIONS?
Alan D. Rawson, P.E. Materials Engineer NHDOT
Bureau of Materials Research P.O.
Box 483, 5 Hazen Dr. Concord, NH
03302-0483 603-271-3151 arawson_at_dot.state.nh.us
SNOWMOBILING IS A DISEASE. THERE IS NO CURE.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com