Title: Lossy image compression based on contrast allocation and global precedence
1Lossy image compression based on contrast
allocation and global precedence
- Damon Chandler and Sheila Hemami
- Visual Communications Lab
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
- Cornell University
2Overview
- Wavelet subband quantization distortions
- Contrast sensitivity and contrast constancy
- Masked detection experiments results
- Application to compression
3Lossy Compression Additive Noise Model
4Discrete Wavelet Transform
5Quantization of Transform Coefficients
6Contrast Detection
Spatial Frequency (c/deg)
Georgeson et al. 1975
7Contrast Detection and Constancy
Contrast
Spatial Frequency (c/deg)
Reference grating
Georgeson et al. 1975
8Contrast Detection and Constancy
_at_ threshold
- Detection thresholds vary w/ frequency.
- Perceived contrast of suprathreshold sine-waves
shows significantly less frequency variation.
Contrast
Spatial Frequency (c/deg)
Reference grating
Georgeson et al. 1975
9How to proportion the contrasts?
- Visually lossless compression
- ? Proportion based on detection thresholds?
- (e.g., less contrast for high-frequency
distortions) - Visually lossy compression
- ? Scale detection thresholds?
- ? Proportion based on perceived contrast ratios?
- Wavelet distortions, not sine waves.
10Masked Detection Experiments
- Task Increase contrast of f c/deg distortions
until they are just visible. - Stimuli
- f 1.15, 2.3, 4.6, 9.2, and 18.4 c/deg
- ? Horiz., Vert., and Diag. (LH, HL, HH
subbands) - 15 natural images maskers
- 8-bit grayscale
- 512x512 pixels
11Masked Detection for Lossless Compression
12Masked Detection for Lossless Lossy Compression
13Masked Detection Results
14Masked Detection Results
15Masked Detection Results
- Detection thresholds vary w/ frequency.
- Less frequency dependence at suprathreshold
contrasts. - Subbands discarded in a fine-to-coarse-scale
progression (global precedence).
16Application to Compression
- Proportion contrasts to preserve global-to-local
scale-space integration
17Application to Compression
- Given C(s) , how to choose Q(s) ?
- Relate pixel-value to luminance
- Relate RMS contrast to MSE
- Compute Q(s) from MSE
- Std. Techniques Iteration, Q(s)?(12?MSE)½, etc.
18JPEG-2000 CSF
JPEG-2000 Contrast-Based
_at_ 0.1 bits/pixel
19Conclusions
- Selective effects on LFs observed with
natural-image backgrounds. - Must consider visual processing of
image-structure global precedence. - Visually optimal bit-allocation is accomplished
by adjusting the contrasts of the distortions.
20JPEG-2000 DAVPW
JPEG-2000 Contrast-Based
_at_ 0.1 bits/pixel
21JPEG-2000 DAVPW
JPEG-2000 Contrast-Based
_at_ 0.1 bits/pixel
22JPEG-2000 DAVPW
JPEG-2000 Contrast-Based
_at_ 0.25 bits/pixel
23Distortions _at_ f c/deg
Distortions _at_ f /8 c/deg
Total C 0.18
X
X
X
X
o
X
o
X
X
X
24- Subbands discarded in a high-to-low-frequency
progression
Subband discarded
25(No Transcript)
26Coarse
Intermediate
Fine
27Coarse
Intermediate
Fine
28(No Transcript)
29Coarse
Intermediate
Fine
30(No Transcript)
31Coarse
Intermediate
Fine
32(No Transcript)
33Contrast Detection
Contrast
Spatial Frequency (c/deg)
Georgeson et al. 1975
34How to proportion the contrasts?
- Consider how image is visually processed
- Natural images ? many low frequencies
- (1/f amplitude spectra)
- Global Precedence Navon 1977
- Global-to-local temporal analysis
- Visual Scale-space Integration Hayes 1989
- Global-to-local integration of edge-structure