LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels

Description:

Intermediate node (router B) provides a FEC stack of RSVP, LDP in echo response. Ingress (router A) uses that FEC stack in echo request when sending next echo ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: juni72
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:
Tags: lsp | mpls | over | stack | trace | tunnels

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels


1
LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels
  • draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-00
  • Nitin Bahadur Juniper Networks
  • Kireeti Kompella Juniper Networks
  • IETF 69, MPLS WG, Chicago

2
Tracing a Tunneled LSP
  • Do not allow tracing inside RSVP LSP
  • Allow tracing inside RSVP LSP

3
Problem scenario
Allow tracing inside RSVP LSP
  • Node Bs next-hop for LDP LSP is node C
  • Node A sends echo request with LDP FEC to node C
  • Node C knows nothing about LDP FEC, returns
    error
  • Node A reports trace error

4
Problem Statement
  • For hierarchical LSPs or LSPs tunneled over other
    LSPs, we should be able to trace the entire
    end-to-end path.
  • Intermediate outer-LSP nodes should allow inner
    LSP trace to go through
  • Intermediate outer-LSP nodes not required to
    provide detailed information about outer LSP

5
Solution
  • Intermediate node (router B) provides a FEC stack
    of ltRSVP, LDPgt in echo response
  • Ingress (router A) uses that FEC stack in echo
    request when sending next echo request (to router
    C)
  • When router D receives echo request with FEC
    stack containing ltRSVP, LDPgt, it sends Egress-Ok
    for RSVP FEC
  • Ingress (router A) now pops an entry from (local)
    FEC stack and resends echo request to router D
    with LDP FEC

6
Solution (contd.)
  • Intermediate routers provide ingress information
    regarding start of a new tunnel.
  • FEC details can be hidden by sending a NIL FEC in
    response (ltNIL, LDPgt instead of ltRSVP, LDPgt)
  • Main logic at ingress application to correctly
    traverse the tunnels

7
TLV changes proposed by draft
  • Builds on RFC 4379 (LSP-Ping)
  • Intermediate routers that are ingress of a new
    tunnel/LSP-segment modify the echo response as
    follows
  • Add a bit in DSMAP to indicate more data is
    associated with DSMAP
  • A new Downstream FEC stack TLV is added
  • Contains information to associate with particular
    DSMAP
  • Contains FEC stack (similar to that in echo
    request) for tracing downstream

8
Next Steps
  • WG feedback on problem/solution
  • Adopt as WG doc ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com