LANDSCAPE LEVEL BIODIVERSITY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

LANDSCAPE LEVEL BIODIVERSITY

Description:

Is there a sufficient degree of connectivity among ecosystems? ... Seral stage distribution. 9. yes. x. Structural complexity. 8. yes. x ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:123
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: BCGov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LANDSCAPE LEVEL BIODIVERSITY


1
LANDSCAPE LEVEL BIODIVERSITY
2
Relevant FREP questions
  • Are ecosystems represented across the landscape
    in time and space?
  • Is there a sufficient degree of connectivity
    among ecosystems?
  • Are stand-level management objectives for
    maintaining biological diversity (e.g., retention
    of wildlife trees and coarse woody debris)
    adequately contributing to the maintenance of
    diverse ecosystems over the landscape?

3
Milestones
  • Initial scoping papers completed (L.Kremsater)
  • (May-July 2006)
  • Working group established (Sept 2006)
  • Review, revision and prioritization of DART
    tool and indicators (Dec 2006)
  • Project Charter developed (draft) (Jan 2007)

4
Draft Project Objectives
  • TWO Inter-related projects
  • To provide quantitative data on a range of
    indicators which are generally accepted as
    important elements of patterns of natural
    disturbance.
  • To provide landscape-level context to stand-level
    biodiversity RSM data through pilot effectiveness
    evaluations.
  • HowProposed Pilots which will
  • Critically assess the pilot approach, and apply
    this knowledge to developing standardized
    procedures for future effectiveness evaluations.

5
Goal 1 Evaluating biodiversity attributes using
current DART indicators
6
Goal 2 Putting FREP stand-level data into a
landscape context
  • directed by the goals of stand-level retention
    and what is being monitored at the stand-level
  • need to know the distribution of important stand
    level elements across the landscape (i.e., snags,
    big trees, and large CWD)
  • Need to develop predictive attribute
    trajectories for different stand ages and forest
    types for these elements
  • Data from literature values, cruise data,
    stand-level FREP data
  • Compare predicted natural abundance of these
    structures to actual FREP field data how well
    are we doing?

7
(No Transcript)
8
Next steps
  • Update DART code to meet current software
    standards
  • Modify DART logic model to incorporate
    new/revised indicators and FREP objectives
  • Develop trajectories for each of the stand level
    elements
  • Pilot implementation in Prince George TSA and
    Sunshine Coast TSA
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com