A longitudinal panel study on antecedents and outcomes of workhome interference PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 16
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A longitudinal panel study on antecedents and outcomes of workhome interference


1
A longitudinal panel study on antecedents and
outcomes of work-home interference
Holger Steinmetz, Michael Frese, and Peter
Schmidt University of Giessen / Germany
2
Introduction
  • Work-Home Interference (WHI)
  • A form of interrole-conflict in which the role
    pressures from the work and nonwork domain are
    mutually incompatible (Greenhaus Beutell, 1985)
  • Work makes nonwork role performance more
    difficult (Katz Kahn, 1964)
  • Work hinders nonwork role performance (Edwards
    Rothbard, 2000)
  • Forms of WHI / conflict (Greenhaus Beutell,
    1985)
  • Time-based
  • Strain-based
  • Behavior-based

3
Antecedents and outcomes of WHI
  • Complex models of antecedents and outcomes of WHI
    (e.g., Carlson Perrewé, 1999 Frone, et al.,
    1992 Frone, 1997 Kopelman, et al., 1983)

4
Antecedents and outcomes of WHI
  • Frone, M. R., Russel, M., Cooper (1992)

5
Antecedents and outcomes of WHI Meta-analytic
results
  • Proposed antecedents (Byron, 2005)
  • Working time
  • Job stress
  • job involvement
  • Work support
  • Schedule flexibility
  • Family stress
  • Proposed outcomes (Allen et al., 2000)
  • Job attitudes (Job satisfaction, organizational
    commitment)
  • Well-being (Depression, burnout, somatic
    complaints etc.)
  • Turnover motivation
  • Job performance

6
Longitudinal studies on WHI
  • Heterogenous results because of
  • different time lags
  • a variety of constructs
  • Limitations
  • Research focus Mostly WHI ? well-being
  • Comprehensiveness of the causal analysis (cf.
    Zapf, Dorman Frese, 1996) Half of the studies
    tested only one direction
  • Method Mostly multiple Regression (Ordinary
    least squares) or path analysis

7
The study Tested models
8
The study Tested models
Model A
9
The study Tested models
WHI
Working hours
Depression
Turnover motivation
Stressors
Model B
Model A
10
The study Tested models
WHI
Working hours
Depression
Turnover motivation
Stressors
Model B
Model A
Turnover motivation
WHI
Working hours
Working hours
WHI
Turnover motivation
Depression
Depression
Stressors
Stressors
Model D
Model C
11
The study Tested models
WHI
Working hours
Depression
Turnover motivation
Stressors
Model B
Model A
Turnover motivation
WHI
Working hours
Working hours
WHI
Turnover motivation
Depression
Depression
Stressors
Stressors
Model D
Model C
12
Autoregressive (panel) models
13
The studySample
  • Sample
  • Two waves Time lag 1 year
  • Broad German Sample a variety of occupations
    from various industries
  • Demographic variables representative for the
    German working population
  • T1 N 365
  • T2 N 133
  • Mean N 188 across the cells of the covariance
    matrix
  • Drop out analysis
  • Correlation between model variables and T2
    dropout
  • Only signficant r .13 (for age) and r .12
    (for turnover motivation)

14
The studyConstructs and measures
  • Constructs and measures
  • Stressors (Zapf, 1991), 3 items for time
    pressures and 3 items for role ambiguity (e.g.,
    how often do you get unclear assignments?
  • Working time Weekly working hours of the last 2
    weeks
  • WHI (Netemeyer, et al., 1996) 3 items (e.g.,
    Things at home dont get done because of my
    work)
  • Depression (Zung, 1965) adapted by Mohr (1986) 3
    items (e.g., I am looking into the future
    without any hope)
  • Turnover motivation (Schaubroeck, et al., 1996)
    3 items (Turnover cognitions, implementation
    behavior, and intention to quit)

15
The study Results (Synchronous effects models)
16
The study Standardized path coefficients
Working hours
Turnover motivation
.12
.24
WHI
.19
.19
Depression
Stressors
.14
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com