Regulatory Structure for GE Crops - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Regulatory Structure for GE Crops

Description:

GE breaks the 'species barrier'; Nature never allows genes from one species to move to another ... Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: alanmc8
Learn more at: http://ucbiotech.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regulatory Structure for GE Crops


1
Regulatory Structure for GE Crops
  • Alan McHughen, D.Phil.,
  • University of California
  • Riverside, Ca USA
  • alanmc_at_ucr.edu

2
Arguments to ban GMOs
  • GMOs are hazardous because
  • GE breaks the species barrier Nature never
    allows genes from one species to move to another
  • GE involves random insertions into genome
  • GE crops and foods are untested and unregulated
  • Once released, GMOs can never be recalled
  • or other claims of danger?

3
USA Theory of risk assessment
  • Science based risk analyses
  • Other factors applied later
  • Product vs process
  • rDNA processes are not inherently risky
  • Any breeding process may result in risky products
  • Labelling
  • Product composition, not process

4
Foreign Genes in Wheat
Friebe et al., Crop Science 391692-1696 (1999)
5
Variety release requirements genetically
engineered crops
  • USDA (APHIS) - environmental issues
  • HHS (FDA)- food and feed safety
  • EPA- pesticide usage issues

6
Variety release requirements genetically
engineered crops
  • USDA- environmental issues
  • Plant Protection Act (PPA, 2000) also
    administers
  • Plant Patent Act (for asexually propagated
    plants)
  • Plant Variety Protection Act (PVPA)

7
USDA/APHIS procedures
  • Notification
  • Simplest means for least hazardous GE plants
  • Must meet six criteria (non-weedy stable known
    function non-infectious/toxic/pharmaceutical/indu
    strial non-virulent non-human or animal
    pathogenic source)
  • Permit (for field testing release)
  • More complex GE plants, requires greater scrutiny
  • Petition for nonregulated status
    (commercialization)
  • Complete risk analysis

8
US field trials, 1986-present
  • 12,000
  • http//nbiap.biochem.vt.edu/cfdocs/fieldtests1.cfm
  • 47,000
  • Environment Maine (PR 8/18/2005)
  • once released, can never be recalled.

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Variety release requirements genetically
engineered crops
  • FDA- food and feed safety
  • Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
  • GRAS (substantially equivalent)
  • Food Additive

12
Variety release requirements genetically
engineered crops
  • EPA- pesticide usage, food safety issues
  • Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
    Act (FIFRA)
  • Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) and
  • Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)

13
Arguments to ban GMOs
  • GMOs are hazardous because
  • GE breaks the species barrier Nature never
    allows genes from one species in another
  • GE involves random insertions into genome
  • GE crops and foods are untested and unregulated
  • Once released, GMOs can never be recalled
  • The same hazards as other breeding methods.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com