Gender differences in earnings over the lifecourse - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Gender differences in earnings over the lifecourse

Description:

British Household Panel Study: Davies et al. (1997) Appendix 1 of Rake ed2000) ... Rake (ed) Cabinet Office, 2000, Section 3.4, Appendix1 and Appendix 5 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: min4151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gender differences in earnings over the lifecourse


1
Gender differences in earnings over the lifecourse
  • Heather Joshi,
  • Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of
    Education, University of London
  • GeNet seminar on Gender and Ageing
  • Cambridge October 4 2005

2
Individual Incomes of men and women, by age 2003-4

Family Resources Survey
3
Differences between mens and womens incomes to
be unpacked
  • Vary by source
  • Earnings, benefits, savings
  • Differ by age
  • Cohort and Lifecourse
  • Differ by level of initial human capital
  • Education ( here)
  • This talk focuses on earnings, likely to affect
    pension and savings
  • and particularly hourly pay as the driver of
    other differences, though itself affected by
    previous experience

4
Overview across cohorts
  • Simulations of lifetime incomes, partly
    projected, up to retirement age cohorts entering
    the labour market in post-war Britain
  • Averaged over 3 levels of education and three
    family sizes
  • Men assumed to work continuous full-time
  • Women to have interruptions and part-time work
    for children, and to be paid less on that
    account, and for a pure gender penalty

5
Cohort difference in relative earnings
6
VERY STYLIZED FACTS
  • Women of the generation newly retired have only
    about one fifth the earnings record behind them
    of their male contemporaries
  • Increased employment participation and higher
    relative wages projected to raise this
    proportion, but only to 62 by the time the 1970
    cohort retires in 2035
  • Current and future women pensioners cannot rely
    on equal pay to produce equal pensions

7
Cohort differences in family and education women
now aged 35-85
8
Cohort effects participation
9
Simulated relative lifetime earnings by cohort,
children and education
10
Differentials with Cohort
  • The higher labour labour force participation of
    the higher educated amplifies their higher pay to
    generate much higher lifetime income than less
    educated women, but still not as much as educated
    men
  • Low educated women with large families
    particularly likely to face dependence on men
    and/or state

11
Within lifecourse developments
  • How and when are these differences in earnings
    generated?
  • Focus on hourly pay, though hours of work also
    then to fall over some parts of the lifecourse

12
Age profile in pay per hour
  • Pay gaps between men and women increase as age
    increases.
  • Cohort effect?
  • Is this just because the older people missed out
    on Equal pay opportunities,
  • or Lifecourse effect?
  • Is there a widening pay gap over the lifecourse
    of a given cohort?

13
Age Profile of Relative Pay
14
Age and Cohort New Earnings Survey
15
The Evolution of the Gender Pay Gap for Different
Birth Cohorts
Source Manning and Swaffield (2005), from New
Earnings Survey, includes part-timers
16
Gender Differences in Wage Growth
Source Manning and Swaffield-MS(2005) New
Earnings Survey
17
Widening gender wage gap
  • Faster growth for men at least early on
  • Does it merely reflect divergence in experience
    on the labour market
  • Or does the underlying degree of unequal
    treatment of also increase with age?
  • MS find that most of the growth in mens
    relative pay over 1st 10 years reflects unequal
    treatment. How does this tally with our findings?

18
Potential components of the pay gap
19
Some analyses of wage gaps, in terms of human
capital
20
Sources for previous slide
21
Findings on cohort members employed full-time,
1991-2000
  • Unequal treatment varies across individuals not
    necessarily systematically with the level of
    wages,
  • Average unequal treatment fell from 16 to 12
    during the 90s for women around the age of 30.
  • But 32 of women aged 30 in 2000 were treated no
    better than if they had been paid at the rates
    received by the previous cohort.
  • The position of women born in 1958 deteriorated
    between age 33 and 42. The index of unequal
    treatment increased from 12 to 21.- more or
    less across the board.
  • Makepeace et al (2004)

22
Relative hourly pay of women fulltimers over time
for full-timers in the 1958 cohort , adjusted for
human capital by quintile of original wage
Source Makepeace et al 2004 using NCDS
23
Analysis of fulltimers in BCS70 and NCDS
Source Makepeace et al 2004 using NCDS and BCS70
24
Wage ratios fitted for fulltime continuous worker
in WOMU model
Rake (ed) 2000
25
Validation?
  • Rising profile for graduates not supported by
    MS work on 11 years observations of BHPS
  • Or the NCDS estimates for 33-42
  • Small nos of graduates in the 1994 BHPS
  • Otherwise simulated pattern fits cohort estimates
    reasonably well
  • Lifetime equality for highly educated likely to
    have been overestimated.
  • More support for age than education differnences
    in gender premium

26
Estimated gender premia by age and education
BHPS 1994 and cohort studies
27
Conclusions
  • Gender penalites increase over the lifecourse
    even without taking into account interuptions,
    part-time hours and part-time pay
  • For those who are already old this means a
    substantial legacy of unequal earnings
  • For those who are young do not assume wage parity
    will be sustained even for women pursuing an
    uninterrupted career

28
Further Research
  • Our project will use longitudinal data on pay and
    occupations to investigate the role of
    occupational mobility in the evolution of the
    relative fortunes of men and women as they get
    older.
  • Our main evidence will come from the 1946, 1958
    and 1970 birth cohorts
  • Team members Shirley Dex, Diana Kuh, Peter
    Dolton, Kelly Ward,Jenny Neuburger,

29
References
  • Unequal Pay for Women and Men Evidence from the
    British Birth Cohort Studies. Joshi and Paci
  • MIT Press 1998
  • Gender earnings differentials over time, across
    and within cohorts unequal pay among individuals
    in British Cohort Studies,1991 and 2000,
    Makepeace, Dolton and Joshi, International
    Journal of Manpower Aug 2004
  • Womens Lifetime Earnings . Rake (ed) Cabinet
    Office, 2000, Section 3.4, Appendix1 and Appendix
    5
  • Gender and Pay some more equal than others H.
    Joshi in A Heath, J Ermisch and D Gallie
    (eds.) Understanding social Change. OUp for
    British Academy 2005
  • The Gender Gap in Early Career Wage Growth, Alan
    Manning and Joanna Swaffield, LSE , May 2005
  • Evidence to House of Lords Select Committee on
    Economic Affairs Economics of Ageing, Heather
    Joshi 2004
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com