Title: atmospheric phase correction at the Plateau de Bure interferometer
1atmospheric phase correction at the Plateau de
Bure interferometer
- IRAM interferometry school 2006
- Aris Karastergiou
2No atmosphere
- Interferometers can image astronomical sources by
measuring delays in arrival times of incoming
wavefronts between pairs of antennas
3Effects of the atmosphere
- Variations in the refractive index of the
atmosphere above each antenna distort the
wavefront and result in delays different to those
predicted.
4Water vapour
- At radio frequencies, the variations of the
refractive index are almost entirely due to
parcels of water vapour, which are poorly mixed
with the atmosphere. - Luckily, water vapour not only causes delays in
propagation, it also emits radiation. Both
effects are proportional to the water vapour
present along the line of sight.
5- therefore
- by monitoring the emission of water vapour in
the line of sight of each antenna, we could
compute the extra delay induced by the
atmosphere, and correct the phase
Problem solved!
6But how do we do it?
7The atmosphere
Atmospheric transmission in the zenith direction
from the Plateau de Bure site. The six curves
correspond to different amounts of water vapour,
starting from 0 (light blue) to 10 mm (black).
Two blue arrows denote two water lines used for
atmospheric phase correction, at 22 and 183 GHz.
8IRAM against atmospheric phase noise
- Until August 2004
- The amount of water was derived from the total
power measurements of the astronomical receivers
in the 1mm band. Good overall performance but
some significant drawbacks. Clouds (high
temperature, small path length effect) are not
accounted for. - After August 2004
- Dedicated receivers placed in each of the six
antennas, monitor the 22 GHz emission line. New
system is separate from the astronomical
receivers.
9The receivers
Uncooled, broadband (7 GHz). Extremely
stable Gain fluctuations of order 10-4
10- Filters extract three 1 GHz bands from the total
bandwidth.
Cloud contribution to Tsky has different
frequency dependence ( v2) to water vapour, so
three channel system allows to remove this
baseline, leaving only the water vapour
emission.
11- Effect of clouds can be removed
-
- Tsky,H2O Tvapor Tcloud
- TAtm (1 - e-tv) TCloud (1 - e-tc) , tC n2
- linearize cloud exponential term, measure at two
frequencies, build weighted mean - DTdouble Tsky ,1 Tsky,2 (n1/n2)2 Tvapor,1
Tvapor,2 (n1/n2)2 - Same for the other frequency pair, and then a
subtraction of one double value from the other,
to form DTtriple
12An unexpected advantage of the triple channel
system
- A geostationary satellite, HOTBIRD 6 is emitting
inside the first 22 GHz channel. Channels 2 and 3
can still provide the information for correcting
the phase.
13The data
Channel 1
Channel 2
Channel 3
combination removes continuum baseline
14The data
Antenna 1 Antenna 2
15The data
Between 2 antennas, the difference in the
measured water vapour emission is clearly
correlated with the astronomical phase.
16Converting water vapour emission to phase
- Atmospheric model
- Based on the total amount of water in the line of
sight, parameters such as the ambient temperature
and pressure, and a general description of the
atmosphere at that moment. - Empirical approach
- From observations of strong sources, where the
phase is well determined, a conversion
coefficient can be calculated. Not constant with
time.
17(No Transcript)
1822 GHz calibration
- Each channel of each radiometer needs to be
calibrated separately, although triple
combination is useful in removing various harmful
effects. - The process involves observing a table at
ambient temperature, to estimate the conversion
factor between counts and Kelvin.
- Ambient temperature 300 K is far from sky
temperature 25 K, so conversion factor is assumed
linear over this large range. - For absolute phase correction, the calibration
must be extremely precise.
19Relative Vs Absolute
- When moving between sources, the radiometers are
pointing through different parts of the
atmosphere. The phase may change by many full
cycles! To track it, calibration of the 22 GHz
receivers needs to be excellent!
20- Relative phase correction
- Aim is to remove phase fluctuations within each
on-source period. - Reduced phase rms means higher amplitude of the
visibilities. - Required for longer baselines / higher
frequencies. - Phase is not tracked when the telescope is moving
from one source to another. Less sensitive to
calibration problems.
21- Phase noise is larger at longer baselines. Power
law dependence on baseline length (see talks by
R. Lucas and J. M. Winters from yesterday).
Corrected phase does NOT depend on baseline
length.
22(No Transcript)
23- Absolute calibration
- Phase is constantly tracked, even when changing
source. - Calibration requirements much more stringent.
- Astronomical phase of point-like strong sources
should be used in the 22 GHz calibration process. - Has not been achieved yet.
24Points to remember
- Water vapour in the atmosphere results in noisy
phases. Effect is worst for longer baselines,
higher frequencies. - To attack the problem, the emission of a water
line is monitored, in the line of sight of each
antenna of the interferometer. - 22 GHz line is better for conditions with high
(gt4mm) water vapour. 183 GHz is more useful for
dryer sites.
25Points to remember
- The water vapour radiometers can be used for
relative phase correction, which means the phase
cannot be maintained after a source change. - Calibration of the 22 GHz receivers is crucial,
given the required precision. - Conversion of calibrated signal into phase can be
done either by atmospheric model, or empirically.
26- The relative phase correction works well in
reducing the phase noise and increasing the
visibility amplitudes. - No working absolute phase correction system
exists today. - Plans for arrays with extremely long baselines,
observing at extremely high frequencies are well
under way.
Problem should be solved soon...