The regulation of p53 dynamics in response to DNA damage - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

The regulation of p53 dynamics in response to DNA damage

Description:

The regulation of p53 dynamics in response to DNA damage ... Wip1 identified as the putative inhibtor. Inhibitor should initially be at relatively low levels ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:448
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: eb77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The regulation of p53 dynamics in response to DNA damage


1
The regulation of p53 dynamics in response to DNA
damage
  • Eric Batchelor
  • Lahav Lab
  • Department of Systems Biology
  • Harvard Medical School

2
(No Transcript)
3
How does the structure of the signaling
network shape the dynamic response?
What is the role of temporal dynamics of
signaling events in cellular decisions?
4
The p53 Network Bow-tie Signaling Architecture
p53
5
Previous studies reported damped p53
oscillations in response to IR
Lev Bar-Or et al, PNAS, 2000
6
Fluorescent protein fusions to monitor the
network dynamics in individual cells
pMT-I
p53
CFP
hygroR
pMdm2
Mdm2
YFP
NeoR
3.5 kb
P53-CFP
Mdm2-YFP
7
(No Transcript)
8
p53 dynamics after DNA damage (DSBs)
  • Cells show undamped p53 pulses
  • The mean amplitude and duration of the pulses do
    not depend of the amount of DNA damage
  • The number cells in the population that pulse
    increases with DNA damage

9
Cancer Research, 2006
10
What is the mechanism regulating undamped p53
pulses in response to IR?
11
p53 oscillations are intrinsic to the p53/Mdm2
loop
p53 oscillations are triggered by pulses of the
signal
DSBs
Double Strand Breaks
ATM-P
Chk2-P
p53
Mdm2
Geva-Zatorsky et al., Mol Sys Bio 2006
12
Phosphorylated ATM shows pulses in Western blots
following DNA damage
Double Strand Breaks
Time (hrs)
0
1
2
3
5
4
7
6
9
8
10
ATM-P(S1981)
ATM-P
Tubulin
Chk2-P
p53
ATM-P
Mdm2
Time (hr)
13
Phosphorylated Chk2 shows pulses in Western
blots following DNA damage
Double Strand Breaks
Time (hrs)
0
1
2
3
5
4
7
6
9
10
8
Chk2-P(T68)
ATM-P
Chk2
Tubulin
Chk2-P
p53
Chk2-P
Mdm2
Time (hr)
14
The mechanism regulating p53 pulses
What represses ATM-P and Chk2-P levels between
pulses?
Double strand Breaks
ATM-P
Chk2-P
?
p53
Mdm2
15
Chk2-P pulses depend on p53
Chk2-P
Time (hrs)
0
1
2
3
5
4
7
6
9
10
8
Chk2-P
Chk2
tubulin
16
p53 over-expression inhibits Chk2 activation
Chk2-P
p53
Nutlin3
Vassilev et al. Science 2004
Mdm2
17
The mechanism of p53 pulses
Are repeated ATM-P/Chk2-P pulses required for
series of p53 pulses?
Double strand Breaks
ATM-P
Chk2-P
p53
?
Mdm2
18
Are repeated ATM-P/Chk2-P pulses required for
the series of p53 pulses?
Wortmannin
Chk2-P
Time (hrs)
0
1
2
5
4
3
6
8
7
4
9
5
6
7
8
9
Chk2-P
Chk2
p53
Wortmannin
Time (hrs)
0
1
2
5
4
3
6
8
7
4
9
5
6
7
8
9
p53
Initial transient activation of p53 by ATM and
Chk2 is insufficient to drive multiple,
autonomous p53 pulses by the p53-Mdm2 module
19
Model of recurrent initiation
Signal
Inhibitor
p53
Mdm2
Expansion of Geva-Zatorsky, Nitzan Rosenfeld et
al. Mol Sys Bio 2006
20
Wip1 identified as the putative inhibtor
  • Inhibitor should initially be at relatively low
    levels
  • Inhibitor levels will undergo pulses, with pulse
    valleys at levels elevated with respect to
    basal level.

1.2
Time (h)
0
1
2
3
5
4
7
6
9
8
0.5
10
6.5
1
p53
0.8
Wip1
0.6
Wip1
0.4
0.2
tubulin
0
0
2
3
5
4
7
6
9
8
10
1
Time (h)
21
Predicted Wip1 RNAi Effect
Depletion of Wip1 predicted to increase p53
pulse duration
22
Effect of Wip1 RNAi on p53 in Single Cells
control RNAi
Wip1 RNAi
Wip1 important for maintaining constant pulse
amplitude and duration as a function of
g-irradiation dose
23
Varied p53 Dynamic Responses to DNA Damage
p53
Mdm2
24
p53 Shows Graded Pulses in Response to UV
Radiation
2 J/m2 UV
8 J/m2 UV
100
100
80
80
60
60
p53-CFP Fluorescence
40
40
20
20
0
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
20
30
50
10
40
Time (hrs)
Time (hrs)
p53 shows pulses that change in amplitude and
duration as a function of UV-irradiation dose
25
Future directions
  • How does Wip1 contribute to constant p53 pulse
    amplitude independently of irradiation dose?
  • What is the p53 dynamic response to other DNA
    damaging stimuli? Non-DNA damaging stimuli?
  • Can we synthetically perturb the system to
    switch between dynamic responses?
  • Can we use this system as a model for
    bioengineered oscillators / pulse generators?
  • How do the responses relate to p53 activity?

26
Acknowledgements
Galit Lahav and the other Lahavians Irun
Bhan Madhulika Jain Ran Kafri Alex Löwer
Caroline Mock Dave Nelson Sara
Thiebaud Jared Toettcher Ketki Verkhedkar
Jeremy Gunawardena Roy Kishony
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com