The Foreign Accent Syndrome a Norwegian case study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The Foreign Accent Syndrome a Norwegian case study

Description:

Examples of deviant prosody and syllable structure. Vowel lengthening ... Abnormal prosody as a result of prolongation of articulation and pausal durations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:489
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: inger
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Foreign Accent Syndrome a Norwegian case study


1
The Foreign Accent Syndrome - a Norwegian case
study
  • Inger Moen
  • Hanne Gram Simonsen
  • Signhild Skogdal

2
A Norwegian FAS patient with a Russian accent
  • The patient, BH, is a lady, about 35 years of
    age, living in Kirkenes.
  • She has an early form of Multiple Sclerosis.
  • No dysarthria (Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment)
  • No indication of aphasia

3
Speech characteristics of BH
  • Deviant vowel and consonant articulations
  • Deviant rhythmical patterns
  • Deviant pitch patterns

4
Examples of deviant segmental articulations
  • Palatalisation
  • Lowering of vowels
  • Deviant liprounding
  • Inappropriate voicing of plosives
  • Fricative articulation of glides

5
Examples of deviant prosody and syllable structure
  • Vowel lengthening
  • Vowel insertion
  • Syllable simplification (dropping of final
    consonants)
  • Deviant fundamental frequency

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
The observers impression
  • Why a foreign accent?
  • Why a Russian accent?

9
FAS a motor speech disorder?
  • Five articulatory sub-systems
  • Glottis
  • Velum
  • Tongue body
  • Tongue tip
  • Lips

10
The articulation process
  • Planning the sequence of movements required to
    achieve motor goals for each phoneme
  • Synchronising articulators
  • Adapting the plans according to phonetic and
    other contextual factors

11
FAS reduced articulation process
  • Reduced ability to plan the sequence of
    articulatory movements
  • Vowel insertion
  • Dropping of consonants
  • Reduced ability to synchronise articulators
  • Inappropriate voicing
  • Lowering of vowels
  • Palatalasation
  • Inappropriate liprounding

12
Gestural phonologyVocal tract variables
  • GLOTTAL (glottal aperture)
  • VELIC (velic aperture)
  • SKELETAL
  • Lips (lip
    protrusion) (lip aperture)
  • ORAL Tongue tip (tongue tip
    constriction location)

  • (tongue tip constriction degree)
  • Tongue body (tongue body
    constriction
  • location)

  • (tongue body constriction
    degree)
  • Gestural scores (simplified) Anita

13
Gestural scores (simplified) Anita
14
Overscaling and underscaling of vocal tract
variables
  • Overscaling of lip protrusion too much
    liprounding
  • Overscaling of tongue tip and tongue body glides
    becoming fricatives
  • Underscaling of tongue tip and tongue body
    constriction lowering of vowels

15
Incorrect phasing of gestures
  • Incorrect phasing of glottal and oral gestures
    voicing of voiceless consonants
  • Incorrect phasing of gestures relative to the
    gestural score prolongation of vowels

16
Dysarthria or apraxia?
  • Dysarthria Dysarthria is caused by damage to the
    nerve impulses to the speech organs preventing
    normal movement of these in all conditions.
  • Apraxia In apraxia there is no damage to the
    speech organs as such. What has been disturbed,
    is the capacity to program the articulatory
    organs for the conscious production of speech.

17
Apraxia of speech (AOS)?
  • Typology of errors in the speech of patients with
    AOS
  • Segmental errors that may be classified either as
    phonetic distortions or phonemic substitutions,
    depending on whether they lie within the phonemic
    boundaries of the particular language or not
  • Prolongation of segmental durations and
    intersyllabic pauses
  • Variable articulatory errors
  • Reduced coarticulation
  • Abnormal prosody as a result of prolongation of
    articulation and pausal durations
  • Difficulties with initiating speech, indicated by
    articulatory groping and struggle

18
Evidence from therapy
  • Traditional speech therapy for motor speech
    disorders has not been particularly successful in
    the case of BH. But a more cognitive approach,
    focusing on the patient's awareness of her own
    speech output compared to normal speech, has had
    a positive effect. This is also an indication
    that the problem may be of an apraxic nature.

19
Summing up
  • FAS is a motor speech disorder as a result of
    neurological damage
  • An apraxic disorder(?)
  • Exhibits features which to the observer resemble
    a foreign accent
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com