Richard Woodward President Sierra Environmental Services, Houston, TX Richard Sloan Remediation Mana - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Richard Woodward President Sierra Environmental Services, Houston, TX Richard Sloan Remediation Mana

Description:

Consideration of Stakeholder Concerns in the Development of Site Characterization Plans ... The Site Characterization and Analysis Penetrometer System (SCAPS) 23 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:142
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: EndU71
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Richard Woodward President Sierra Environmental Services, Houston, TX Richard Sloan Remediation Mana


1
Richard Woodward PresidentSierra
Environmental Services, Houston, TX Richard
SloanRemediation Manager Lyondell Chemical
Company, Channelview, TX NICOLE Network
Meeting18-19 April 2002National Research
Council of Italy, Pisa Italy
Consideration of Stakeholder Concerns in the
Development of Site Characterization Plans and
Deployment of Resources
2
Objective
  • Identification of Stakeholders and
    acknowledgement of their concerns during
  • Characterization plan development
  • Plan execution and
  • Resource deployment
  • Creates the foundation of confidence, comfort
    and trust needed for flexible interpretation of
    appropriate regulatory standards and legislative
    constraints.

3
(No Transcript)
4
Stakeholders
  • Authorities, agencies, regulators
  • Industry, the regulated community
  • Academia/researchers
  • Special interest groups, environmental advocates
  • Contractors, consultants and other service
    providers
  • Community leaders, potential receptors

5
Warrington
E - ETBE
B - Benzene
M - MTBE
I - Isooctane
T - Ethanol
I
E
E
I
T
I
T
E
T
E
I
I
T
E
I
E
T
T
6
Acknowledge Stakeholder Concerns
  • Equal Partners Agencies, Contractors,
    Industries sensitivity to needs and concerns
  • Cost effective management of the issues
  • Open information sharing Independent Quality
    Assurace Team (IQAT) to promote credibility,
    trust and comfort
  • Acknowledged convergence of interests
  • Common objectives

7
W. Massachusetts Gas Station - Site
  • 15-20 of sand and gravel over 70-80 of
    interbedded fine sand and silt also cobble layer
  • Bedrock at 90-150 bgs across the study area
  • Depth to GW 15-25 (seasonal), perched water
    table in study area
  • Complex geologic conditions
  • Commercial/industrial area with other releases
  • Public water supply wells 1,500 downgradient
    from gasoline release area

8
W. Massachusetts Gas Station - Release
  • 1989
  • UST failed soon after installation
  • Weld failure
  • 12,000 gallons of gasoline released 2 releases
    of premium gasoline
  • Owner failed to notify DEP and no remedial action
    for 2 months
  • Installed three recovery wells at the release
    site to capture plume and remove floating product
  • Installed monitoring wells to evaluate plume
    migration

9
SVE and MPE Treatment Shed
TigheBond
10
W. Massachusetts Gas Station - Release
  • Indoor air sampling at station indicated minimal
    impacts
  • Consultant opinion plume is contained on
    station property
  • DEP required downgradient investigation
  • 1993 - Elevated MTBE detected in a deep MW
    approximately 550 downgradient of the site
  • Elevated benzene arrived 2 years later
  • Installed 4th recovery well at downgradient
    property 90-100 feet bgs to sanitary sewer

11
Total VOCs Under Pumping Conditions (1999)
12
Perched Water Between Source Well Field
TigheBond
13
Flexibility in Appropriate Regulatory Standards
and Legislative Constraints
  • Risk Based Corrective Action
  • Expedited remedial action
  • Voluntary corrective action
  • Brownfield Development Incentives

14
Site Assessment
  • Basic Objectives
  • Define the nature and extent of the affected soil
    and groundwater and the risk to the public health
    and the environment
  • Determine the site-specific critical issues that
    drive the overall response action
  • Develop the technical basis for a timely,
    cost-effective, and environmentally sound
    response plan

15
Site Assessment
  • Principles
  • Driven by need to effectively manage the site and
    to protect the public health and the environment
  • Evaluate local media soil, surface water,
    groundwater, and air
  • Identify at-risk receptors and likely exposure
    pathways. Focus on these first
  • Determine all chemicals of concern
  • Focus on source definition and control second
  • Focus on dissolved plumes third
  • Develop sufficient data to manage all site issues

16
Subsurface Definition
  • Series of vertical transects
  • Cx,y,z fKx,y,z, where
  • C contaminant distribution
  • K hydraulic conductivity distribution
  • Effects of heterogeneity on migration
  • Three dimensional perspectives
  • Coring (continuous, split-spoon, etc.)
  • Geophysics (borehole surface)
  • CPT (3-channel and piezocone)

17
Direct Push Rig
  • Quick (samples/day)
  • Cost-effective
  • Access tight spaces
  • Delineate stratigraphy
  • Identify high/low K zones
  • May reduce number of core samples required
  • Depth limited

18
20 Ton CPT Truck
19
Example CPT Profiles
20
Traditional Site Assessment1,2-DCA SiteShallow
Zone
1,2-DCA SiteDeeper Zone
21
Membrane Interface Probe System (MIPS)
22
Laser Induced Fluorescence (LIF)CPT Rod With
Sapphire Window
Rapid Optical Screening Tool (ROST) systems.
The Site Characterization and Analysis
Penetrometer System (SCAPS)
23
3D Contaminant Characterization
24
Discrete Multi-Layer Samples (DMLS)
  • Vertical contamination distribution within
    sampled intervals
  • Tracer dilution used to estimate K distribution

25
Results from Different Sampling Methods
26
Wilson Cost Study on 311 Site Assessments((B.H.Wi
lson Battelle Hydrocarbons Conference, Monterey,
CA 2002)
  • 183 SC, 53 KS, 32 NY, 43 ME, TX, CA, IL
  • 276 service station/petroleum
  • 275 service station
  • 32 impacted drinking water wells or
    supplies
  • 3 hazardous waste sites

27
Estimate of Site Assessment Cost
  • Mean cost - 146,143 (SC)
  • Mean cost - 279,022 (128 sites non-SC)
  • Mean cost - 231,270 (93 sites non-SC, service
    station/petroleum)
  • Site assessment estimate -85,000 to 130,000

28
(No Transcript)
29
French Limited Site
  • Isolated DNAPL pockets
  • Rebound when natural gradient was reestablished
  • Detailed analysis of active remediation effects
  • Focused site assessment

30

31
Conclusion
  • Identification of Stakeholders and
    acknowledgement of their concerns during
  • Characterization plan development
  • Plan execution and
  • Resource deployment
  • Creates the foundation of confidence, comfort
    and trust needed for flexible interpretation of
    appropriate regulatory standards and legislative
    constraints.

32
Resources
  • Field analytics Dynamic workplanning
    http//cluin.org/tiopersp/issue.cfm
  • Applying the Concept of Effective Data to
    Environmental Analyses for Contaminated Sites
    (EPA 542-R-01-013)
  • Using the Triad Approach to Improve the
    Cost-effectiveness of Hazardous Waste Site
    Cleanups (EPA 542-R-01-016)
  • TechDirect Clean-up Information
    http//clu-in.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com