THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE STOCK MARKET - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE STOCK MARKET

Description:

'The study of financial decision-making with the help of concepts borrowed from psychology. ... (1983) calls this approach 'the Olympic model.' PEOPLE ARE HUMAN ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:316
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: melissam79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE STOCK MARKET


1
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE STOCK MARKET
  • Werner De Bondt
  • April 2003

2
OVERVIEW
  • The challenge
  • What is behavioral finance?
  • Case study
  • The quality of analysts forecasts

3
VALUATION
  • Value is about the future.
  • The future is uncertain.
  •  
  • The quality of judgment is critical.
  •   

4
FORECASTING?
  • Economic fundamentals
  • Cash flows the opportunity cost of capital.
  •  
  • The state of the market
  • The dynamics of crowd behavior.

5
  • "A full understanding of human limitations will
    ultimately benefit the decision-maker more than
    will naïve faith in the infallibility of his
    intellect."
  •  
  • Paul Slovic
  • Journal of Finance
  • 1972

6
  • What was forecasted
  • did not happen.
  • What happened
  • was not forecasted.

7
MYTHS OF THE TECHNOLOGY BOOM
  • Tech companies generate breathtaking gains in
    economic productivity. The exponential growth
    will accelerate over time. Therefore, these firms
    are good investments. There is no price too high
    for a good tech company."
  • Prospects are more important than immediate
    earnings.
  • Monopolies create unbeatable advantages.
  • Tech companies are not subject to the business
    cycle.

8
  • ..It is still fair to say that, on the whole,
    our eco-nometric models are at best very crude
    approxi-mations of the true economy. .. these
    models require large doses of judgment if they
    are to be useful to decision-makers. .. the
    strengths of intuitive forecasting complement the
    weaknesses of model-based prediction.
  • Alan Greenspan
  • 1990

9
WHAT IS BEHAVIORAL FINANCE?
  • "The study of financial decision-making with the
    help of concepts borrowed from psychology."
  •  
  • Modern finance was conceived as a logical,
    normative model of an idealized decision-maker.
    It assumes self-interested utility maximization,
    rational expectations, and optimal information
    processing.
  • Herbert Simon (1983) calls this approach the
    Olympic model.

10
PEOPLE ARE HUMAN
  • The logic of choice is not an adequate foundation
    for a descriptive theory of decision making.
  • The deviations from the normative model are
    widespread, systematic, and fundamental.
  • gt We see many anomalies and we need to develop
    new, better, descriptive theories.

11
XENOPHON, OECONOMICUS, 390 B.C.
  • ISCHOMACHUS
  • ..to a careful man, no business gives quicker
    returns than farming..
  • My father taught me that .. For he never allowed
    me to buy a piece of land that was well farmed
    but pressed me to buy any that was uncultivated
    and unplanted owing to the owner's neglect or
    incapacity. Well farmed land, he would say,
    costs a large sum and can't be improved.
  • .. Nothing improves more than a farm that is
    being transformed from a wilderness into fruitful
    fields. I assure you, Socrates, that we have
    often added a hundredfold to the value of a farm
    ..

12
  • SOCRATES
  • .. Did you father keep all the farms that he
    culti-vated, Ischomachus, or did he sell when he
    could get a good price?
  • ISCHOMACHUS
  • He sold, of course, but, you see, due to his
    indus-trious habits, he would promptly buy
    another that was out of cultivation ..
  • SOCRATES
  • Of course, and I declare, Ischomachus, on my oath
    that I believe you, that all men naturally love
    whatever they think will bring them profit.

13
SINCE 1975
  • David Dreman
  •  Paul Slovic, Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman
  • Robert Shiller
  • Werner De Bondt and Richard Thaler
  • Hersh Shefrin and Meir Statman
  •  Robert Haugen
  • Reinhart Selten
  •  After 1990, gt25 other researchers

14
HOW DO PEOPLE THINK?
  • Bounded rationality.
  •  
  • The sources of knowledge
  • Experience, logic, authority.
  •  
  • 1. Mental frames.
  • (Simple conceptual models)
  •   
  • 2. Heuristics.

15
MENTAL FRAMES
  • Affect choice
  •  
  • Can be managed
  •  
  • Are socially/professionally shared
  •  
  • Differ in sophistication
  •  
  • Do not change easily

16
HEURISTICS
  •  Anchoring and adjustment.
  • (First impressions matter.)
  •  
  • Availability.
  • (Vivid information has greater impact.)
  •  
  • Representativeness.
  • (Intuitive logic is distorted by stereotypes.)

17
LINDA
  • Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken, and
    very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a
    student, she was deeply concerned with issues of
    discri-mination and social justice, and also
    participated in anti-nuclear demonstrations.

18
  • What is most likely? What is least likely?
  • 1. Linda works in a bookstore and takes Yoga
    classes.
  • 2. Linda is a bank teller.
  • 3. Linda is a bank teller and is active in the
    feminist movement.

19
CENTRAL INSIGHTSOF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE
  • 1. Intuition is fragile. Basic investment and
    statistical principles are not learned from
    everyday experience.
  •   
  • 2. Some decision errors may be avoided by
    education and by changing the decision process.
    Valuation is most successful if it is based on a
    structured, disciplined framework.
  •  
  • 3. Other people's errors may be our opportunity
    for profit, even if they create risk.

20
ISSUES
  • Error vs. bias.
  •   
  • Experts vs. amateurs.
  •  
  •  Decision anomalies in the lab
  • vs. financial anomalies in the real world
  • vs. price anomalies in markets

21
ANALYST BIAS
  • 1. Excessive optimism
  •  2. Excessive use of stereotypes
  • (Naive extrapolation. Overreaction)
  • 3. Excessive confidence
  • (Large errors)

22
  • 4. Excessive rationalization
  • (Missed turning points. Underreaction)
  • 5. Excessive agreement
  • (Conformism. Groupthink)

23
DO ANALYSTS OVERREACT?
  • U.S. companies with December fiscal years, with
    EPS-data on Compustat, with returns on CRSP, with
    IBES consensus forecasts of EPS.
  • 1- and 2-year forecasts, 1976-1984 (April)
    5-year forecasts of EPS-growth, 1982-1984
    (April).
  • No survivorship bias of any kind.
  • Source  De Bondt and Thaler (1990), De Bondt
    (1992).

24
DO ANALYSTS OVERREACT?
  • 1. The forecast errors are large.
  •  
  • 2. The forecasts are too optimistic.
  •  
  • 3. The forecasts are too extreme. This problem is
    worse for long-term forecasts.
  •  
  • 4. Betting against the forecasts (especially,
    against long-term forecasts) is profitable.

25
INTERPRETATION
  • The results are consistent with cognitive bias
    caused by representativeness.
  •  
  • The profitability of the investment strategy
    agrees with prior work on market overreaction.
    Here, the overreaction is to earnings
    information.

26
HERDING IN ANALYST FORECASTS
  • U.K. companies, 1986-1997.
  •  
  • gt400,000 forecasts made by individual analysts, 0
    to 26 months before the month of the earnings
    announcement, provided by IBES.
  •  
  • Matching actual EPS data.
  •  
  • Source De Bondt and Forbes (1999).

27
HERDING IN ANALYST FORECASTS
  • 1. The consensus forecast errors are large. On
    average, the forecasts are too extreme and too
    optimistic. Indeed, the "low" forecasts are more
    accurate than the consensus forecasts.
  • 2. The range of forecasts is surprisingly narrow.
    Most actual EPS-numbers fall outside the range.

28
  • 3. Disagreement among analysts does not increase
    a great deal as we get further away from the
    date of the earnings announcement.
  • 4. Disagreement does not increase with the number
    of analysts (A), once A exceeds 7 or 8.

29
INTERPRETATION
  • Herding depends on anticipated regret, i.e.,
    error potential. This potential increases with
    task difficulty (forecast horizon) and with the
    number of analysts following the stock.

30
THE GENIUS OF BENJAMIN GRAHAM(The Intelligent
Investor, 1959)
  • "The market is always making mountains out of
    molehills and exaggerating ordinary vicissitudes
    into major setbacks." (p. 110)
  •  
  • "Our own records indicate that the interval
    re-quired for a substantial undervaluation to
    correct itself averages 1.5 to 2.5 years." (p.
    37)
  •  
  • "No one really knows anything about what will
    happen in the distant future but analysts and
    investors have strong views on the subject just
    the same." (p. 133)
  •  

31
GOOD STORIES
  • What are plausible stories that inspire
    confidence?
  • Certainty of information
  • Certainty of inference patterns
  •  
  • Do different patterns lead to the same or
    opposite conclusions?
  •  
  • There are no long chains in people's plausible
    reasoning. Knowledge about the world usually
    prevents absurd inferences.

32
  • BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS
  •  
  • 1. Shortcuts. Analogies. Categorization errors.
    Extrapolation.
  • Value an ideamonopology renta business plan?
  •  
  • 2. Confirmation bias. Troubling facts are easily
    absorbed into existing mental frames.

33
LESSONS
  • 1. The main value of an analyst's report lies in
    the point of view that it develops.
  •  
  • 2. Beware of story-stocks. If large changes in
    earnings are predicted, the actual changes will
    probably be less.
  •  
  • 3. "Low" forecasts of earnings tend to be more
    accurate than the consensus forecast.

34
  • 4. Sell recommendations precede weak return
    performance. Buy recommendations are almost
    meaningless.
  •  
  • 5. The range of analyst EPS forecasts is too
    narrow relative to the range of outcomes.
  •  
  • 6. Invest contrary to analyst forecasts of
    long-run EPS growth.

35
  • As a general rule, it is foolish to do just what
    other people are doing, because there are almost
    sure to be too many people doing the same thing.
  •  
  • William Stanley Jevons,
  • Primer on Political Economy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com