Title: Treatment of Simulated Petrochemical Wastewater by Continuous Electrocoagulation/Ultrafiltration Process
1Treatment of Simulated Petrochemical Wastewater
by Continuous Electrocoagulation/Ultrafiltration
Process
Presenter Mahmood Siddiqui
2Presentation Outline
- Introduction to the process
- Objectives of research
- Methodology
- Conclusion
3Petrochemical Wastewater
- Petrochemical wastewater is considered to be
complex and hard to treat. - Characteristics highly industry specific.
- Typical refinery wastewater characteristics used
in the study.
4Three Phases of Pollutants
- Suspended solids and colloids.
- Immiscible
- Dissolved (organic and inorganic).
5Electrocoagulation
- Involves the generation of in-situ coagulants by
electrically dissolving either aluminum or iron
ions.
6Benefits of Electrocoagulation
- EC requires simple equipment and is easy to
operate. - Sludge formed by EC tends to be readily settable
and easy to de-water, because it is composed of
mainly metallic oxides/hydroxides. - It removes the smallest colloidal particles,
because the applied electric field sets them in
faster motion, thereby facilitating the
coagulation. - EC produces effluent with less total dissolved
solids (TDS) content as compared with chemical
treatments.
7Membrane Processes
- Reverse Osmosis
- Nanofiltration
- Ultrafiltration
- Microfiltration
-
8Ultrafiltration
- A membrane separation process, driven by a
pressure gradient, in which the membrane
separates components of a liquid larger than a
specific molecule size.
9Advantages of Ultrafiltration
- Consistent water quality.
- Low lifecycle cost through optimized energy use
and minimum chemical requirements. - Compact design resulting in small system
footprint
10Objectives
- Combined use of electrocoagulation and
ultrafiltration processes has not yet been tested
for petrochemical wastewater. - Continuous flow has also not been tested for
Electrocoagulation process.
11Experimental Setup
12Experimental Setup
13Experimental Setup
14Experiments (1-16)
Experimental Parameters Current Density 5, 15,
30, 50 mA/cm2 Contact Time 5, 10, 20, 30 minutes
No Electrolyte
Phenol 75 ppm Oil 10 ppm SS 100 ppm
15Experiments 17 18
Experimental Parameters Optimum combination of
Current Density and Contact Time from first 16
experiments.
Electrolyte 1 and 3 gm
Phenol 75 ppm Oil 10 ppm SS 100 ppm
16Experiments 19 24
Experimental Parameters Optimum combination of
Current Density, Contact Time and Electrolyte
from first 18 experiments.
Increased Pollutant Concentration Phenol 150
and 300 ppm Oil 20 and 30 ppm SS 200 and 300 ppm
17Sample Testing
- Oil EPA Method 1664
- Phenol Spectrophotometer Analysis at 270 nm.
- COD Method 5220 C, Closed Reflux Titrimetric
Method - Suspended Solids Turbidimeter.
18Conclusion
- A new method involving combined use of
Electrocoagulation and Ultrafiltration will be
tested for simulated Petrochemical industry
wastewater under continuous flow. - Different levels of current density, contact
time, electrolyte concentration and pollutant
level will be tested. - Standard tests will be used to analyze the
treated samples collected at various time
intervals.
19Thank you