The Relationship between Perceptual Learning Styles and Language Learning Strategies of Tertiary Level Turkish EFL Students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

The Relationship between Perceptual Learning Styles and Language Learning Strategies of Tertiary Level Turkish EFL Students

Description:

S.Ipek KURU-G NEN. Anadolu University, TURKEY. ipekkuru_at_anadolu.edu.tr. Background. Recent years witnessed a tremendous interest in understanding how good learners ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:403
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: mehme5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Relationship between Perceptual Learning Styles and Language Learning Strategies of Tertiary Level Turkish EFL Students


1
The Relationship between Perceptual Learning
Styles and Language Learning Strategies of
Tertiary Level Turkish EFL Students
  • S.Ipek KURU-GÖNEN
  • Anadolu University, TURKEY
  • ipekkuru_at_anadolu.edu.tr

2
Background
  • Recent years witnessed a tremendous
    interest in understanding how good learners learn
    a foreign language achieve success
  • Good language learners share some behaviors
    for learning
  • Attempts at understanding these common points
    might help to facilitate our understanding of
    the learning process of second/foreign language
  • Learning styles and learning strategies
    language learning success in EFL/ESL classroom

3
Background
  • Learning style an individuals natural
    habitual and preferred way(s) of absorbing,
    processing, and retaining new information and
    skills (Reid, 1995, p.34)
  • It involves perception, cognition,
    conceptualization, affect and behavior peculiar
    to ones own individual learning
  • Learning strategy consciously selected
    processes which may result in action
    specific behaviors learners select

4
Background
  • Language learning styles may be indicators
    of specific language learning strategies
    these strategies can give way to success in the
    long term
  • Examining the styles and strategies of our
    learners very important in understanding
    their certain behaviors and helping them become
    aware of themselves as learners
  • Various taxonomies of learning styles and
    language learning strategies perceptual
    learning styles
  • Oxfords taxonomy of language learning strategies

5
The Study
  • Aim
  • Investigating the relationship between perceptual
    learning styles and language learning strategies
    of tertiary level Turkish EFL students by
    applying a mixed method of qualitative and
    quantitative design
  • 1. Is there any relationship between language
    learning strategy use and perceptual learning
    styles of tertiary level Turkish EFL students ?
  • 2. How do high proficiency level and low
    proficiency level learners differ in their use of
    language learning strategies and perceptual
    learning styles ?

6
Methodology
  • Participants
  • 80 second year tertiary level university students
  • 19-21 years old
  • Took similar courses like reading, writing, and
    speaking
  • Instruments
  • Background questionnaire to control some
    variables gender, purpose for learning the
    language and possible visits to countries where
    English is spoken as the native language

7
Methodology
  • Quantitative Part
  • Two instruments Strategy Inventory for
    Language Learning and Perceptual Learning Styles
    Preference Questionnaire
  • A TOEFL Test to determine high and low
    proficiency level learners
  • SILL developed by Oxford (1990)
  • 50 question version for EFL learners
  • Six sub-scales cognitive, metacognitive,
    compensation, memory, social and affective
    strategies.

8
Methodology
  • PLSPQ developed by Reid (1987) to
    identify the preferred perceptual learning styles
  • Six subscales auditory, visual, tactile,
    kinesthetic, individual and group style
  • Qualitative Part
  • Retrospective Interviews to have a better
    understanding about their preferred learning
    styles and language learning strategy use
  • Five high proficiency level and five low
    proficiency level learners

9
Methodology
  • Data Analysis
  • Quantitative Data
  • Descriptive statistics SILL and PLSPQ
  • Total scores for each of the subscales mean
    scores and standard deviations were also
    calculated to show the general learning
    style preferences and language learning strategy
    uses
  • Relationship between the perceptual learning
    style preferences and language learning strategy
    use Pearson product moment correlation
    coefficient

10
Methodology
  • Qualitative Data
  • Interviews audio-taped and then transcribed
    used to support the data gathered through the
    questionnaires
  • Analyzed by two separate raters and inter-rater
    reliability was measured
  • Results
  • Descriptive Statistics Table 1

11
Results
  • Compensation Strategies ease their learning
    and overcome many difficulties they face
  • Memory strategies applying images, sounds,
    and reviewing
  • Group style students preferred to learn best
    when they work with others
  • Kinesthetic style preference to learn by
    getting someones body into action and moving
    around

12
Results
  • Correlation Analysis
  • Both sub-scales and total scores were correlated
    Table 2
  • General findings there is no relationship
    between the language learning strategies and
    perceptual learning styles of the participants
  • There are significant correlations between some
    of the strategies and styles
  • There is relationship between cognitive
    strategies and individual styles
    compensation strategies and individual style
    memory strategies and visual style
    affective strategies and visual style

13
Results
  • When they were compensating a difficulty or
    practicing, receiving and sending messages
    they prefer to work alone
  • When they were reviewing, applying images, sounds
    and when they try to lower their anxiety
    they prefer to learn visually
  • In terms of tertiary level Turkish EFL students
    no association exists between their strategy
    use and learning style preferences

14
Results
  • Qualitative Findings
  • The basic difference between high proficiency and
    low proficiency learners was the awareness of
    strategies and styles
  • High proficiency learners stated that they know
    the importance of using the appropriate
    strategies for being successful
  • I think strategies are very important. I
    understood it this year. Especially for reading,
    if you do not use appropriate strategies you can
    not become an efficient reader. Thats why I try
    to learn new and effective strategies that would
    help me to overcome difficulties

15
Results
  • Low proficiency learners seem not to be aware of
    strategies they acknowledged that they do
    not use them to achieve success
  • I dont think I use many strategies. O.K I
    learned some of them in different lessons...but
    they are like something to memorize. If you ask
    me their names I can tell, but the problem is...I
    cant use them. I know some friends use effective
    strategies, but I think I have a long way to go
    to be successful

16
Results
  • Transfer of different strategies into various
    contexts
  • High proficiency learners stated that they
    were able to transfer a good strategy into
    another area, but low proficiency learners were
    not able transfer any strategies into other
    contexts
  • Learning styles there are also differences
    between high and low proficiency level students
    High proficiency learners know how they
    learn best, are aware of their learning styles
    and design their studies accordingly

17
Results
  • Low proficiency group were not aware of
    their styles and even when some of them were
    aware they ignore their learning styles when they
    study language
  • Students ideas on the relationship between
    learning styles and success High proficiency
    learners asserted a direct relationship between
    styles and success as they think ones knowing
    his/her own styles determine how s/he would study
    to achieve success

18
Results
  • Low proficiency level students did not see
    any relationship between learning styles and
    success They acknowledged that they know the
    meaning of style, but they never organized
    themselves accordingly
  • Relationship between language learning strategies
    and styles most of the students stated that
    they did not think about something like that
    even the high proficient students
  • Supports the quantitative findings

19
Conclusion
  • Being aware of styles and strategies, and using
    them appropriately may bring success while
    learning a foreign language
  • Turkish students no correlation between the
    overall strategy use and style preferences
  • Good language learners use strategies more
    frequently
  • High proficient learners were aware of the
    importance of using strategies and transferring
    them into other contexts.

20
Conclusion
  • Learning styles are emphasized for achieving
    success especially by the high proficient
    students showed the way to study in a more
    organized and conscious way
  • Quality of strategy use other than the quantity
    high proficient learners acknowledged the
    importance of using strategies appropriate for
    specific actions in their studies
  • Although students may be aware of the strategies
    and styles, they may not know how to use them
    effectively

21
THANK YOU
  • ?

22
Descriptive Statistics
23
Correlation Analysis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com