Governance strategy for the Washington City Group Comments on draft proposal by Howard Meltzer (UK) February 19-20 Brussels - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Governance strategy for the Washington City Group Comments on draft proposal by Howard Meltzer (UK) February 19-20 Brussels

Description:

Governance strategy for the Washington City Group Comments on draft proposal by Howard Meltzer (UK) February 19-20 Brussels What is governance? What should it cover? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: PSB13
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Governance strategy for the Washington City Group Comments on draft proposal by Howard Meltzer (UK) February 19-20 Brussels


1
Governance strategy for the Washington City
GroupComments on draft proposal byHoward
Meltzer (UK)February 19-20Brussels
2
What is governance? What should it cover?
  • System of decision making processes
  • Roles - contribution made to the group
  • Responsibilities - areas which show leadership
    and manage resources
  • Accountabilities - the outcomes for which they
    are answerable.
  • Roles, responsibilities and accountabilities are
    only meaningful in the context of the purpose of
    the group.

3
Relationship between governance and purpose
  • The preamble to the draft proposal should be
    renamed Terms of reference and include a
    general statement of the main purpose of the
    group.
  • The main purpose of the WCG is the promotion and
    co-ordination of international co-operation in
    the area of heath statistics by focusing on
    disability measures suitable for censuses and
    national surveys for the purpose of policy
    formulation and analysis.
  • Expand purpose of policy to include conclusion
    of position paper.

4
From general purpose to specific aims
  • The Terms of reference should include
    statements of the specific aims of the group.
  • These specific aims should describe outputs (type
    of disability measures) with a prioritisation
    rating.
  • Methodological issues represent operational
    qualifications of the implementation of the
    disability measures and as such are part of the
    WCG discussions but not a specific aim.

5
Evaluation of disability measures
  • For high priority measures the WCG should assess
  • the suitability of the indicator for policy
    purposes
  • the technical properties of each measure
  • general availability in a wide range of
    countries
  • use for national policies and priorities (where
    known)
  • frequency with which comparisons should be made.

6
Operating principles and structure
  • Who are the stakeholders and what is their
    relative influence and accountability?
  • What are the arrangements for reviewing and
    ensuring compliance with governance principles
    especially for a group where participation is
    voluntary?
  • If meetings are held each year, what reports are
    expected and when?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com