Cultural context - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Cultural context

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author: Department of Psychology Last modified by: Daniel Messinger Created Date: 9/22/2006 3:17:38 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: Departme376
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cultural context


1
Childcare effects
  • Cultural context
  • Daniel Messinger, Ph.D.

2
School as a multilevel context
  • Classroom Practices
  • Curriculum Content
  • Instructional Design
  • School
  • Curriculum Policies
  • Demographics
  • Organization
  • Child
  • Classroom Engagement
  • Motivation
  • Self-Esteem
  • Achievement
  • Goals
  • External Relations
  • School, home,
  • community linkages
  • Teacher Characteristics
  • Beliefs
  • Instruction Techniques
  • Relationships with
  • students

3
Hypothesized case Heterogeneous grouping and
complex instruction ? increase educational equity
direct and indirect effects on child
4
At Success Academy Charter Schools, High Scores
Polarizing Tactics.
  • At most schools, if a child is flailing
    academically, it is treated as a private matter.
    But at Success Academy Harlem 4, one boys
    struggles were there for all to see On two
    colored charts in the hallway, where the
    students performance on weekly spelling and math
    quizzes was tracked, his name was at the bottom,
    in a red zone denoting that he was below grade
    level.

KATE TAYLOR. APRIL 6, 2015, NYT
5
Aggression
  • African-Americans had greatest change in
    aggression if no ethnically matched peer

6
Child-care thru 3 peer competencies
  • Positive responsive caregiver behavior most
    consistently associated with positive skilled
    peer interaction
  • More time in child-care ? observed to be more
    positive and skilled in peer play in child care
  • caregivers rated these kids as more negative with
    playmates.
  • but observed peer play not related to the
    quantity of care
  • Nor associated with peer competence as rated by
    mothers.
  • Maternal sensitivity and children's cognitive and
    language competence predicted peer competence
    across all settings and informants.
  • NICHD_Early_Child_Care_Research_Network (2001).
    "Child care and children's peer interaction at 24
    and 36 months The NICHD study of early child
    care." Child Development 72(5) 1478-1500

7

8
No child care effects on observed interaction
9
Child-Care Effect Sizes Early Child Care and
Youth DevelopmentNICHD Early Child Care Research
Network
  • Children (n 1,261) were recruited at birth and
    assessed at 15, 24, 36, and 54 months.
  • Exclusive maternal care did not predict child
    outcomes
  • Higher quality child care related to advanced
    cognitive, language, and preacademic outcomes at
    every age and better socioemotional and peer
    outcomes at some ages.
  • More childcare hours predicted more behavior
    problems and conflict, according to care
    providers.
  • More center-care time was related to higher
    cognitive and language scores and more problem
    and fewer prosocial behaviors, according to care
    providers.

10
54 Month Outcomes
11
Long-Term Effects of Early Child Care?
  • Parenting was a stronger and more consistent
    predictor of childrens development than early
    child-care experience.
  • But higher quality care predicted higher
    vocabulary scores and more exposure to center
    care predicted more teacher-reported
    externalizing problems. Belsky et al., 2007

12
(No Transcript)
13
Background Information
  • Study Aim To extend previous research by
    examining the links between routine early
    child-care experiences and adolescent functioning
    in a large and economically diverse sample
  • Historically early child-care is thought of two
    ways
  • Early child-care is associated with poorer social
    outcomes
  • Early child-care promotes social and academic
    skills before entry to kindergarten
  • Research supports both views
  • More time in center-type settings as a young
    child
  • Negative social and behavioral outcomes
  • Positive academic outcomes

14
Background Information
  • This study wanted to see if the effects of early
    child-care
  • Fade away over time
  • Development builds on prior experience
  • Low income children in high-quality child care
    show
  • Better academic outcomes through high school
  • Higher rates of employment
  • Less criminal activity as adults

15
Research Questions
  1. Are early child-care quality, quantity, and type
    related to adolescent functioning at age 15?
  2. Are pathways from early child care to adolescent
    functioning mediated through prior functioning?
  3. Do child gender or familial risk moderate the
    relationship between early child care and
    adolescent outcomes?

16
Method
  • 1,364 families were randomly selected from the
    National Institute of Child and Human Development
    Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development
    (NICHD SECCYD)
  • Demographics
  • 26 of the mothers had no more than a high school
    education
  • 21 of families had incomes no greater than 200
    of the poverty level
  • 22 were a minority

17
Measures
Construct Measure Time Points
Child-care type (type of child care arrangement home-based care, father care, grandparent care) Telephone and personal interviews with the mother Every 3 months until the child reached 36 months and every 4 months until the child was 54 months
Child-care hours Amount of hours per week child was in non-maternal care 6, 15, 24 ,36, and 54 months
Child-care quality Observational Record of Caregiving Environment (ORCE) 6, 15, 24 ,36, and 54 months
Cognitive-academic achievement Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery Revised 54 months, 1st Grade, 3rd Grade, 5th Grade, Age 15
Risk Taking Audio computer-assisted self-interview Age 15
Impulsivity Questionnaire Age 15
Externalizing Problems Teacher Report or Youth Self-Report 54 months, 1st Grade, 3rd Grade, 5th Grade, Age 15 (YSR)
18
Quality, Quantity and Type as Predictors
19
Problem Behavior as a Mediator
20
Results Quality, Quantity and Type as Predictors
  • Higher quality care is associated with lower
    externalizing scores at age 15
  • Adolescents who experienced more hours of
    nonrelative child care across their first 4.5
    years reported more risk-taking and greater
    impulsivity at age 15
  • More hours in nonrelative care predicted poorer
    social adjustment
  • Child-care quality showed significant
    associations with childrens cognitive-academic
    achievement at age 15
  • Children who experienced higher quality care had
    significantly higher levels of cognitive-academic
    achievement at age 15

21
Problem Behavior as a Mediator
  • Higher hours spent in childcare significantly
    predicted higher risk taking behaviors and
    impulsivity at 15 years of age
  • There were modest levels of mediation when
    examining the association between hours spent in
    childcare and externalizing behavior problems at
    age 15
  • May be due to the informant changing
  • Higher quality non-relative childcare
    significantly predicted less externalizing
    behaviors at age 15

22
Results Familial Risk and Gender as Moderators
  • Do child gender or familial risk moderate the
    relationship between early child care and
    adolescent outcomes?
  • No evidence emerged supporting the hypothesis
    that familial risk or gender moderates this
    relationship for problem behaviors or
    cognitive-academic outcomes

23
Take Home Points
  • Early child care quality predicts
    cognitive-academic achievement
  • Moderate to high quality child-care produces the
    greatest long term effects
  • Quality of early child care experiences have long
    lasting effects on all children despite SES
  • Higher quality nonrelative childcare is related
    to less externalizing behavior at age 15
  • More hours in child care and more center-type
    care are related to higher levels of behavior
    problems in children
  • The link between child care, cognitive-academic
    outcomes, and problem behaviors is consistent
    over a 10 year period

24
(No Transcript)
25
Background Information
  • Higher quality childcare is associated with
    better cognitive and academic outcomes
  • Quality of care has been shown to interact with
    maternal sensitivity
  • Low quality of care, low maternal sensitivity
  • Diathesis-stress highly negative children will
    suffer in low quality environment
  • Differential susceptibility - highly negative
    children will be more reactive to the environment

26
Study Aim
  • Does difficult temperament in infancy continue to
    moderate effects of childcare quality on problem
    behavior in adolescence (15 years)?
  • 842 total participants
  • High-difficulty vs. Low-difficulty subgroup for
    temperament
  • Quality of care observed

27
Measures
28
Results
  • Externalizing behavior problems were greater for
  • females, single parent homes
  • Greater risk-taking
  • Males, non-Caucasian ethnicity, lower family
    income, higher proportion of partner absence
  • Greater Impulsivity
  • Lower family incomes, greater exposure to any
    non-maternal child care in the early childhood
    years

29
Results
  • Consistent with diathesis stress model
  • Externalizing problems only significant when
    child care quality was less than 2.84
  • Higher scores reflect childrens experience with
    caregivers who were more attentive, stimulating,
    positively affectionate, less intrusive and
    negative

30
Discussion
  • Low quality day care may be associated with lack
    of cognitive and language stimulation
  • Stress may mediate adverse effects of low-quality
    childcare
  • Low-quality care is physiologically stressful for
    children and may account for some of the adverse
    effects
  • Future studies should assess the degree to which
    this is true

31
Discussion Questions
  1. If early child-care quality predicts greater
    cognitive-academic outcomes and hours spent in
    child-care predicts more externalizing problems
    at age 15, how do you find the right balance of
    child-care that produce the best outcomes?
  2. Why do you think time spent in child-care and
    quality of child-care were better predictors of
    adolescent outcomes than type of child-care?

32
Effects of child and classroom characteristics on
peer play (Howes et al., 2008)
  • Preschoolers particularly sensitive to contextual
    influences on social interaction skills
  • Adaptive outcomes depend on goodness-of-fit
    between child characteristics and context

The classroom context (nesting of children within
classroom, diversity, and entry policy) accounted
for more of the variance in both complex play and
peer anxiousness ratings than did child
characteristics.
33
Context
  • The classroom context (nesting of children within
    classroom, diversity, and entry policy) accounted
    for more of the variance in both complex play and
    peer anxiousness ratings than did child
    characteristics.

Classroom variations accounted for up to 72
percent of the variance in complex play and at
least 50 percent of the variance in peer ratings
(anxiousness ratings).
34
Kids in more diverse classes ? more Complex Play
increase, particularly if ethnically matched peer
present
35
Child-care History, Classroom Composition, and
Childrens Functioning in Kindergarten. Julia
Dmitrieva, Laurence Steinberg, and Jay Belsky.
2007. http//pss.sagepub.com/content/18/12/1032.ab
stract
Classroom-composition effects
  • A childs externalizing behavior is explained by
    the child-care histories of children in their
    classrooms above and beyond their own

36
Child-care History, Classroom Composition, and
Childrens Functioning in KindergartenJulia
Dmitrieva, Laurence Steinberg, and Jay Belsky
  • Non-parental child care associated with
  • Elevated levels of externalizing behavior
  • Enhanced linguistic, cognitive, and academic
    functioning
  • Classroom-composition effects
  • Is a childs externalizing behavior explained by
    the child-care histories of children in their
    classrooms?
  • Peer contagion

37
Effects of care
  • Predictors of poorer achievement
  • gt30 hrs/week
  • initiation at center
  • before 2 years of age
  • Used as classroom level predictors
  • proportion of children in classroom
  • Center care versus any child care

38
Classroom-level effects gt individual effects
  • Variance in class-level characteristics
  • externalizing behavior
  • 15 (T1) and 19 (T2) of variance
  • achievement
  • 35 (T1) and 31(T2) of variance
  • Significant classroom level effects

39
Conclusions and Discussion
  • Effects of early or extensive non-parental care
    affect not only the child, but their classmates
    as well
  • Being in a class with high proportion of students
    with child-care histories affects all children,
    independent of personal experience
  • Are effects amplified or attenuated over years of
    schooling?

40
WHAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE EARLY HEAD START
EVALUATION FINDINGS IN A DEVELOPMENTAL CONTEXT
JOHN M. LOVE, RACHEL CHAZAN-COHEN, HELEN RAIKES,
AND JEANNE BROOKS-GUNN (2013)
  • Randomized efficacy trial of 17 EHS programs
  • Federal Early Head Start (EHS) began in 1995
  • 3,001 low-income families
  • 35 African American, 24 Hispanic, and 37 White
  • pregnant women or an infant under the age of 12
    months
  • Randomly assigned to treatment or control
  • 91 of treatment group receiving some services
  • (1) impacts of EHS at ages 2 and 3 (when services
    were being offered) and at age 5, and (2)
    contributions of early education experiences
    across first 5 years

DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2012.00699.x
41
Developmental effects
  • At 2 and 3 years, EHS benefited children and
    families impacts were seen in all domains,
    effect sizes .10 -.20
  • At 5, EHS children had better attention,
    approaches toward learning, fewer behavior
    problems
  • But no effect on early school achievement
  • A higher percentage of EHS than control children
    were enrolled center-based preschool.
  • At 5, children and families who experienced EHS
    followed by formal programs fared best overall.

42
  • Although fewer than half the children enrolled in
    center-based preschool programs between ages 3
    and 4, almost 90 participated in the year
    preceding kindergarten. A higher percentage of
    EHS than control children were enrolled.
  • Nonexperimental analyses suggested that formal
    program participation enhanced children's
    readiness for school while also increasing
    parent-reported aggression.
  • At 5, children and families who experienced EHS
    followed by formal programs fared best overall.
  • Benefits in language, behavior, and parenting
    were associated primarily with EHS benefits in
    early school achievement were associated
    primarily with preschool attendance.

43
  • Reviews positive influence of peer play on
    academic and social outcomes for African American
    preschool children
  • Previous research mostly on white middle-income
    children
  • Strengths-based resiliency framework
  • Developmental ecological theory
  • Within-group variability
  • Transactional and bidirectional effects

44
Interactive peer play
  • Play dimensions Play interaction
  • Play disruption
  • Play disconnection
  • Positive peer interactions mediated relation
    between ext. int. problems and math outcomes
    (Tracy friends)

Play buddies play partners and other
RCTs Other ethnic groups Educational practice
45

46
Adjustment Scales for Preschool Intervention
(ASPI)--Context
  • Existing scales consider behaviors to be stable
    deficits within children
  • Do not consider whether behaviors vary over
    different settings
  • Or when, where and how to intervene
  • Development of the (ASPI)
  • Specifically developed for low income preschool
    children
  • Language of preschool teachers, rather than
    psychiatric terms
  • 22 developmentally appropriate preschool
    classroom situations 2 non-situation specific
    unusual behavior problems
  • 22 maladaptive behaviors 22 adaptive behaviors
  • 5 behavioral dimensions Phenos
  • Externalizing aggressive, oppositional
    hyperactive/inattentive
  • Internalizing withdrawn/low-energy socially
    reticent
  • Limitations
  • Didnt measure impact of multiple contexts in
    classroom on outcomes

47
  • Theoretical Model
  • developmental-ecological approach ?
    (bioecological systems theory)
  • Goal To examine the individual and interactional
    influence of the types of behavioral problems
    (what) and the situational context(s) in which
    they occur (where) on childrens developmental
    outcomes
  • Identified 3 reliable and unique situational
    dimensions Situs
  • Structured learning
  • Peer Interactions
  • Teacher Interactions
  • N3,799 Head Start children
  • 4 gt 5 year olds
  • Boys gt Girls

48
EMOTIONAL BEHAVIORAL ADJUSTMENTWithin Routine
Classroom Situations(Situational Needs)
Problems in Teacher Interactions
Problems in Peer Interactions
  • Talking to teacher
  • General manner with teacher
  • Answering teacher questions
  • Greeting teacher
  • Seeking teacher help
  • Helping teacher with jobs
  • Getting along with peers
  • Behaving in classroom
  • Respect for others
  • belongings
  • Reaction to correction
  • Telling the truth
  • Standing in line

49
  • Unique relationship between situtypes and school
    readiness outcomes
  • Hypotheses
  • Situational dimensions would contribute unique
    variance to the prediction of social and learning
    outcomes
  • The combined contribution of both situational and
    behavioral influences would be greater than
    either set alone
  • Findings
  • Peer Social Competencies
  • Play Disconnection, Disruption Interaction
  • Classroom Learning Competencies
  • Most Importantly
  • Contribution of structured learning to peer
    social competency learning outcomes
  • Phenos moderate the influence of Situs in the
    prediction of multiple social and learning
    competencies
  • N747

50
  • Implications for Policy Practice
  • ASPI guides intervention, rather than creating
    diagnostic labels
  • children are assessed within a naturalistic
    context
  • Developmental-ecological perspective
  • Multiple levels of influence (dynamic
    transaction)
  • child behavior (ontogenetic)
  • classroom situation (microsystem)
  • Interventions
  • Goal shiftfixing the child ? broader systemic
    approach
  • Identification of high-frequency challenging
    situations and behavior problems (Classroom
    Management Intervention Strategies)
  • Professional Development
  • Curriculum

51
Fall Head Start Situational Needs Predicting
Spring Head Start and Spring Kindergarten Social
Competence
  • Problems in peer interactions directly and
    indirectly affected play disruption at the end of
    kindergarten through its effect on play
    disruption at the end of Head Start
  • Problems in structured learning situations
    indirectly predicted play disconnection at the
    end of kindergarten through effect on play
    disconnection at the end of Head Start.

Bulotsky-Shearer, Dominguez, Bell, Rouse,
Fantuzzo, 2010
52
Teachers Beliefs, Instructional Practices, and
Relationships with Students
  • Instructional Practices
  • Classroom climate optimal when teacher is high in
  • Supportiveness
  • Control
  • Balance of Control and Autonomy Granting
  • Promotes intrinsic motivation styles vs. learned
    helplessness
  • Why?
  • Middle and high school teachers use of more
    control-oriented strategies
  • Counter to the developmental quest for autonomy
  • why?
  • Goodness-of-fit between student and instructional
    environment
  • E.g., boys ? reading girls ? science/math

53
Relationships with Students
  • Trusting, caring, respectful teachers associated
    with optimal learning
  • Why?
  • ? Feelings of security
  • allow children to approach, take initiative,
    engage, persist and take risk to develop positive
    achievement related self-perceptions
  • Parallels to attachment security

54
Challenges of School Transitions
  • Negative effects upon entry into middle school
  • Declines in academic motivation,
  • interest in school achievement across early
    adolescent years (11-14)
  • Increases in test anxiety
  • focus on self-evaluation rather than task mastery
  • Increased school truancy and dropout
  • Middle school misfit developmental stage
  • levels of teacher control and reduced student
    autonomy
  • affective relationships between students and
    teachers
  • organization of instruction
  • whole class instruction between class ability
    groupings
  • grading practices (stricter grades)
  • motivational goals (emphasis on performance
    rather than mastery goals

55
Gender-stereotypes during adolescenceIs age the
key variable?
T children who just transitioned from junior
high school
Alfieri et al., 1996
56
A Longitudinal Study of School Belonging and
Academic Motivation Across High School
  • Cari Gillen-ONeel and Andrew Fuligni

Hoffman
57
Results for School Belonging
  • Females higher School Belonging than males in 9th
    grade
  • Decline over time (6.92)
  • No changes for males in School Belonging over
    time
  • No ethnic differences in baseline or slope
  • Interaction effect for Latin females
  • Greater slope compared to males than in other
    groups

Hoffman
58
Methodology
  • Tracked kids for 4 years, N 572
  • 3 HS in Los Angeles, with focus on Latin, Asian,
    and European children who come from low, middle
    and high SES groups
  • Schools differed on achievement
  • Data from kids who completed 2 assessment points
    (88 of those enrolled completed 12th grade
    assessment)

Hoffman
59
Methodology
  • School Belonging measure - Revised institutional
    engagement measure from Tyler Degoey, 1995
  • Averaged scores on 5 point Likert scale of 7
    questions, e.g., I feel like I am a part of my
    school
  • Academic Achievement GPA measured across
    classes for the year
  • Value intrinsic value measured using 2 items
    utility value measured using 3

Hoffman
60
Results for School Belonging
  • Females higher School Belonging than males in 9th
    grade
  • Decline over time (6.92)
  • No changes for males in School Belonging over
    time
  • No ethnic differences in baseline or slope
  • Interaction effect for Latin females
  • Greater slope compared to males than in other
    groups

Hoffman
61
Emotional Development in Adolescence in a High
School Theater Program
  • Limited knowledge about emotion in adolescence
  • What they actually learn and how they learn it
  • Emotional learning in High School Theater Program
  • Why??
  • Arc of work
  • Create demands for understanding group emotional
    dynamics
  • Organizational culture
  • Theory-generating analysis to develop
    propositions
  • Reed W. Larson and Jane R. Brown (2007)

62
Key Players and Data Collection
  • Key players in the production of Les Misérables
  • Cast included 110 of 840 HS students
  • Director ANN
  • Head of School Theater Program Ruth
  • Data Collection
  • 10 students selected for interviews
  • Interviews conducted over production period
  • The 2 leaders and 10 parents were also
    interviewed
  • Follow-up interview conducted 2 years after
  • Weekly observational analyses
  • All data were recorded and transcribed

63
Qualitative Analyses
  • Reconnaissance Lay the land
  • Separating setting and developmental processes
  • Conceptualizing Layers
  • Community surround
  • Program culture
  • Emotional experiences
  • From empirical analyses to theoretical
    postulation

64
The Experiential Setting of Les Misérables
  • The community surround
  • Theater productions were a big deal in this
    town!
  • The program culture
  • Internal culture with its distinctive tools
    cultivated by Ann and Ruth
  • Commitment to high standards
  • Openness to strong emotional experiences
  • Provision of emotional support
  • Emotional experiences
  • Disappointment with casting
  • Satisfaction and elation about doing well
  • Anger and stress with interpersonal obstacles
  • Anxiety and stage fright

Apparent goal consensus
65
What Youth Learned and How
  • Emotional knowledge
  • Individual differences in peoples emotional
    patterns (differ across context)
  • Influence of past experiences
  • Contingencies
  • How emotions influence the group
  • Managing anger and interpersonal stress
  • Managing elation and positive emotion
  • 2 salient themes emerged in the data
  • Youths as agents of change
  • Adults credited with facilitating a special type
    of setting
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com