Fine Tuning the POST System: The Case of an Invalid, Contradictory POST Form - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Fine Tuning the POST System: The Case of an Invalid, Contradictory POST Form

Description:

She had a past history of coronary artery ... it was very likely that she would end up being on a breathing machine ... Contradictory POST Form cont d Learning ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: pols153
Learn more at: https://www.polst.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fine Tuning the POST System: The Case of an Invalid, Contradictory POST Form


1
Fine Tuning the POST SystemThe Case of an
Invalid, Contradictory POST Form
Alvin H. Moss, MD, FACP, FAAHPM Center for Health
Ethics and Law
2
Objectives
At the conclusion of this conference,
participants should be able to
  • Analyze a case which highlights the importance of
    POST form completion
  • Describe the most recent evidence on the impact
    of advance directives in the country
  • Identify the advantages of the POST system over
    advance directives to honor patients end-of-life
    care wishes
  • Explain how the WV e-Directive Registry will
    enable patients end-of-life care wishes to be
    respected
  • Discuss common errors on forms submitted to the
    Registry

3
Fine Tuning the POST System The Case of an
Invalid, Contradictory POST Form
  • A 78 year-old woman was admitted from a
    nursing home with chest pain. She had a past
    history of coronary artery disease status post
    stent placement, congestive heart failure,
    hypertension, lipid disorder, and mild dementia.
    A POST form accompanied the patient and indicated
    CPR in Section A and Limited Additional
    Interventions in Section B. The EMTs and later
    the attending physician wondered what he should
    do with the POST form because Section A and
    Section B seemed to be contradictory. The POST
    form had been prepared by a social worker who had
    signed it, but there was no physician signature
    on it.
  • In transporting the patient, EMS worried,
    What do I do if she codes and I do CPR and get
    her back, but she is not breathing normally? Do I
    intubate her? The emergency department physician
    wondered the same thing, but fortunately she did
    not suffer a cardiac arrest during transport
  • The attending physician saw the patient
    in the emergency department and reviewed the POST
    form without any additional notes or
    documentation.

4
Fine Tuning the POST System The Case of an
Invalid, Contradictory POST Form contd
  • When interviewed by the palliative care
    team who was consulted to address the POST form
    inconsistency, the patient indicated that she
    would not want to be kept alive on machines and
    when it was explained to her that if she had CPR
    and lived through it, it was very likely that she
    would end up being on a breathing machine. She
    said, Well then, I dont want CPR. A revised
    POST form was created and signed by the patient
    and the palliative care physician. The patient
    was discharged back to the nursing home.
  • The daughter who lived out of state and who was
    the patients Medical Power of Attorney
    representative reviewed the POST form and stated
    she wanted her mother to have CPR.
  • What should be done with regard to the
    contradictory POST form and the daughters
    request? How could these situations be prevented
    in the future?

5
Learning Issues
  • Who should be making the decisions for this
    patient and on what basis?
  • How should that person legally be designated?
  • How should the POST form be completed and what
    should be indicated in each section?
  • What should be done with the POST form after it
    is completed?
  • How could the conflict in this case have been
    prevented?

6
The Outcomes of Advance Care Planning (ACP)
Latest Studies
  • The vast majority (? to over ¾) of older adults
    are willing to participate in ACP
  • ACP results in statistically significantly
    different and improved EOLC for patients

Silveira MJ et al. Advance directives and
outcomes of surrogate decision making before
death. N Engl J Med 20103621211-1218. Detering
KM et al. The impact of advance care planning on
end-of-life care in elderly patients randomised
controlled trial. BMJ 2010340c1345.
doi10.1136/bmj.c1345
7
Outcomes of Advance Directives
  • Of 3746 older adults (gt60 yo), 42.5 required EOL
    decision making
  • Of these 1,536 older patients who required EOLC
    decisions, 70.3 lacked capacity
  • In short, 29.8 of older adults required EOL
    decisions but lacked capacity
  • Of these 999 patients, 67.5 had advance
    directives
  • Patients with an advance directive were
    significantly more likely to want limited or
    comfort care and receive it

Silveira MJ et al. Advance directives and
outcomes of surrogate decision making before
death. N Engl J Med 20103621211-1218.
8
Elements of the Advance Care Planning Process
  • Begins by clarifying the patients current health
    status
  • Moves to elicitation of the patients goals of
    care
  • Identifies the patients preferred decision-maker
    if the patient loses decision-making capacity
  • Completes a Physician Orders for Scope of
    Treatment (POST) form to ensure patients wishes
    are respected

Gillick MR. Reversing the code status of advance
directives? N Engl J Med 20103621239-1240.
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Hickman, SE, et al. A Comparison of Methods to
Communicate Treatment Preferences in Nursing
Facilities Traditional Practices Versus the
Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment
Program. JAGS. 2010 58 1241-1248.
14
(No Transcript)
15
Hickman, SE et al. The Consistency Between
Treatments Provided to Nursing Facility Residents
and Orders on the Physician Orders for
Life-Sustaining Treatment Form. JAGS. Published
online 22 Oct 2011
16
Elements essential to reliable, high-quality care
for patients with fatal chronic illnessa
systems approach
Lynn, J. et. al. Ann Intern Med 2003138812-818
17
Communication across Settings
  • the health care facility initiating the
    transfer shall communicate the existence of the
    POST form to the receiving facility prior to the
    transfer. The POST form shall accompany the
    person to the receiving facility and shall remain
    in effect.
  • Code of West Virginia, 16-30-1 et seq.

18
Components of the System
  • Standardized practices and policies
  • Trained advance care planning facilitators
  • Timely discussions prompted by prognosis
  • Clear, specific language on an actionable form
  • Bright form easily found among paperwork
  • Orders honored throughout the system
  • QI activities for continual refinement
  • Statewide registry so that forms are available

19
Legal Protection with POST Use
  • Standardized form according to state law
  • Legally recognized DNR identification
  • Protection from civil or criminal liability for
    good faith compliance with and reliance upon POST
  • Protocol for use in interinstitutional transfers
  • Law covers compliance with POST when completed by
    MD not credentialed in facility

20
Transfer of POST Form
  • Copier to the Photo/Picture setting
  • Contrast to the lowest setting
  • Double-sided copies on 8 ½ x 11 Astrobrights
    Pulsar Pink 24 lb. paper
  • Adjust the contrast setting on your copier to
    achieve the clearest possible copy
  • Can copy white FAX onto pink paper

Office Depot, Office Max, Staples
21
Form Shall Always Accompany Patient/Resident When
Transferred or Discharged!

On the top of the transfer packet!
22
for Palliative Care Evaluation and Advance
Care Planning
The surprise Question A Trigger
  • Would I be surprised if this
  • patient died in the next year?

Moss et al. Utility of the surprise question to
identify dialysis patients with high mortality.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 200831379-1384. Moss et
al. Prognostic significance of the surprise
question in cancer patients. J Palliat Med
201013837-840
23
  • Accurate, relevant information available in a
    medical crisis
  • 24/7 online access by health care providers
    through WVHIN
  • Consumer able to confirm online accuracy of their
    advance directives and medical orders (DNR and
    POST forms) in the Registry
  • Patients wishes will be respected throughout the
    continuum of health care settings
  • Password-protected HIPAA compliant

Registry FAX 304-293-7442
24
Total Registry Forms Received by Type
25
Problems with POST Completion
Form Type Error Rate
POST Forms 29
Surrogate Selection 27
Living Will 23
DNR Cards 22
Medical Power of Attorney 15
Combined Living Will and Medical Power of Attorney 14
  • Just 4 errors make up 72 of all the not
    Registry ready POST forms.

26
The Most Common POST Form Errors
  1. The Opt-In Box was not initialed
  2. The form is missing pages
  3. Conflicting elections in sections A and B
  4. Physicians signature is missing

27
Take-home Messages
  • Be sure to initiate advance care planning
    discussions with patients for whom you would not
    be surprised if they died in the next year
  • Complete POST forms as part of advance care
    planning
  • Submit forms to e-Directive Registry so that
    patients medical orders will be available in a
    crisis

28
  • Contact the Center for
  • ? DNR Cards ? POST Forms ?Brochures
  • Advance Directives ? Health Care Surrogate Forms

www.wvendoflife.org 877.209.8086 FAX 304.293.7442
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com