No%20Cop%20on%20the%20Beat:%20Underenforcement%20in%20E-Commerce%20and%20Cybercrime - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

No%20Cop%20on%20the%20Beat:%20Underenforcement%20in%20E-Commerce%20and%20Cybercrime

Description:

No Cop on the Beat: Underenforcement in E-Commerce and Cybercrime Peter P. Swire Ohio State University & Center for American Progress Fordham CLIP Information Society ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: PeterS315
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: No%20Cop%20on%20the%20Beat:%20Underenforcement%20in%20E-Commerce%20and%20Cybercrime


1
No Cop on the BeatUnderenforcement in
E-Commerce and Cybercrime
  • Peter P. Swire
  • Ohio State University
  • Center for American Progress
  • Fordham CLIP Information Society Symposium
  • May 30, 2008

2
Coming This Monday
  • A new report The ID Divide Addressing the
    Challenges of Identification and Authentication
    in American Society
  • Available on Monday at www.americanprogress.org
  • How to handle these issues across
    national/homeland security immigration voting
    e-health computer security privacy civil
    liberties.

3
Todays Discussion
  • Data breaches, but also broader issues of
    enforcement across geographic jurisdictions --
    law review article in materials
  • E.g., consumer protection crime online
  • Old paradigm of mostly local enforcement
  • Local enforcement, county state a cop on the
    beat
  • Information is local
  • Punishment deterrent effects are local
  • Evidence is local

4
What Changes on the Internet?
  • Information problem
  • Commons problem
  • Forensic problem
  • Basic answer non-local answers needed for
    non-local problems
  • More federal FTC
  • More federated networks of state AGs

5
The Information Problem
  • Physical world a cop on the beat
  • A consumer complaint comes in
  • Honest Amys Used Cars Shady Sams Used Cars
  • Local enforcers have insight/expertise from
    previous complaints use discretion

6
The Information Problem
  • For online commerce or data breach, a complaint
    comes in to the county consumer protection office
    or state AG office
  • Web site typically far away
  • The county/state has a tiny fraction of all
    consumer problems with the site
  • The county/state has weak information for
    exercising discretion
  • Likely result is underenforcement
  • Underenforcement means less enforcement than we
    would expect/prefer if purely local

7
The Commons Problem
  • No commons problem where bad action and victim
    are local
  • Enforcers get credit for stopping local bad guys
  • Local victims are protected
  • Deterrent effects are local

8
The Commons Problem
  • Online, enforcement incentives change
  • Why should I spend my scarce prosecutorial
    resources when most of the protection goes to
    victims outside of my jurisdiction?
  • Deterrence Id rather prosecute where strong
    deterrence locally
  • Public choice Id rather prosecute where mostly
    local people are protected
  • Let someone else go after them a classic
    commons problem -- underenforcement

9
Forensics Problem
  • This problem has been recognized in the
    literature
  • Its harder to enforce where the evidence is
    outside of the locality
  • Harder to get cooperation from distant officials
  • Harder to trace where you dont have compulsory
    process or other sources
  • Result is underenforcement

10
Responses to Underenforcement
  • Information problem
  • Information sharing Consumer Sentinel
  • Commons problem
  • Cross-border task forces
  • Organize around subject matter data breach, ID
    theft, spam, etc.
  • Forensic problem
  • COE Cybercrime Convention for criminal
  • US SAFE WEB Act for FTC

11
Responses to the Problem
  • More generally, recognize the need to match
    solutions to the scale of the problems
  • National (and international), so have national
    solutions
  • FTC role for data breach (Choicepoint), spam,
    spyware, and other consumer protection
  • FTC staffing still far below 1980 levels
  • Federated NAAG and other efforts to match
    geography with the problems

12
Some Objections
  • Law review article addresses these
  • The Internet hasnt really changed anything
  • Enforcement works better on the Internet
  • We dont really want to enforce the law
  • States need to be laboratories of
    experimentation
  • The Feds dont do small potatoes

13
Conclusion
  • The paper highlights the information and commons
    problems that exist for local enforcement and
    non-local fraud crime
  • Likely need to shift to federal or federated
    enforcement
  • For whatever level of enforcement we want for
    each type of law, the next Administration should
    design strategies that address these problems
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com