Title: An interdisciplinary study of land-sea carbon coupling between the Penobscot River and Gulf of Maine
1An interdisciplinary study of land-sea carbon
coupling between thePenobscot River and Gulf of
Maine
William M. Balch Collin Roesler- Bigelow
Laboratory Andrew Barnard, WET Labs Thomas G.
Huntington, USGS, Augusta, ME Huijie Xue,
University of Maine Orono George R. Aiken, USGS
Boulder, CO
2Acknowledgements
- Respective lab groups
- Dave Drapeau, Bruce Bowler, Emily Booth, Laura
Windecker, Heidi Franklin, Rois Langner, Dan
Abraham, Kenna Butler, Yi Du - NASA IDS
3Overview
- Introduce the study area
- Follow DOC from watershed to coastal sea
- Discuss quantity and quality of DOC
- Optical proxies for using remote sensing to
estimate DOC concentrations - 3-D circulation modeling results
- Summarize
4In a recent paper on the Gulf of Maines optical
properties, we showed that the Gulf is
CaseII-dissolved all the time and Case II
particulate about half the time
5The DOC Tea Bag Analogy
- Soil build-up of particulate organic carbon/leaf
litter during growing season- the tea leaves - Precipitation soaks POC- the steep
- DOC is extracted- the brew
- Transformations enroute- binds to other POC,
mineral surfaces (i.e. stains your teeth), is
metabolized (digested) - Remaining DOC is carried downstream to the
oceansome of which is visible, some not, but it
is a large pool!
6But the plot thickens
- There are different ways to brew your tea
- The downstream ocean has its own source of DOC
(some of which is colored) - Which DOC dominates in river-impacted coastal
waters? - What is the fate of the terrestrial vs marine
DOC? (fundamental to the Case II vs Case I
distinction)
7The birth of terrestrially impacted, Case
II-dissolved waterWe start way upstream in the
Penobscot River
D
D
D
West Enfield
8Penobscot River empties into Penobscot Bay
9Penobscot Bay then empties into the Gulf of Maine
10Are the tributaries of the Penobscot equal in
their DOC concentration?
11When you brew your tea is everything
Summer tea
Iced tea
12Timing is everything
- Jan-May
- Frozen ground
- Fast runoff does not penetrate frozen
sedimentspoor steep - Temperature does affect the leaching cold water
bad brew
- June-December
- End of growing season with lots of accumulated
carbon - Runoff percolates in earthgood steep
- Warm temperatures enhance microbial breakdown of
leaf litter, good steep, good brew
13Put daily discharge, measured DOC concentration
as function of flow rate time of year, one can
model the daily DOC flux
14Optical proxies for DOC in the riverfluorescence
of DOC
15Penobscot River-seasonally variable relationship
between discharge and CDOM fluorescence
Eddington CDOM fluor Discharge W. Enfield
CDOM Fluor (ppb QS)
Discharge (cfs)
16CDOM Excitation/Emission fluorescence spectra
vary with land use
lEx(nm)
lEx(nm)
lEm(nm)
lEm(nm)
Passadumkeag Wetland
Pleasant River Agricultural watershed
17Ex/Em properties vary with the watershed
EX200EM300
F (QS eq)
peak ratio (Ex/Em 265/475 225/430)
Different Penobscot Watersheds
Aerial Coverage Wetland
18In line ferry data from Penobscot Baystrong
inverse relation between apg425 and salinity
S a 30 9 15 4.5 0 1
Salinity
apg425
19How much of the DOC that makes it down the river,
through the bay and into the Gulf of Maine?
- First two years of our IDS study we were very
lucky - 2004- Dry year
- 2005 THE wettest year on record
- Allowed a good contrast in the quantity and
quality of the DOC that came out into the Gulf of
Maine
20How much does the DOC change from Penobscot Bay
to the Gulf of Maine?
21How does the quality of the DOC change from Bay
to Gulf?
SUVA (10-3 m2 mgDOC-1 254nm)
22Space time plot for DOCin the Gulf of Maine
23SUVA (DOC specific absorption cross section)
x10-3 m2 (mg DOC)-1
Strong EW gradient
Sargasso Value0.8
24Going back 8 years with agp412 2004 and 2005
indeed were extraordinary years
05 04 03 02 01 00 99 98
Wettest
Dry
25They were extraordinary years for optical
scattering, too
05 04 03 02 01 00 99 98
Wettest
Dry
26Aqua estimates at the mouth of Penobscot Bay
Plt0.001
X
X
X
X
27We have combined the DOC Export along with 3d
circulation model of H. Xue to model the DOC
distribution
28It is clear that in the Gulf of Maine,
transformations are occurring in CDOM plotted
against salinity
29Summary
- The relation between discharge rate and DOC
concentration shows two different relationships,
a winter-spring and summer-fall pattern - The fluorescence properties of CDOM provide
information on watershed type - DOC quantity drops gradually from the upper
watershed through Penobscot Bay - DOC quality (SUVA) is high throughout the Penn
Bay and drops dramatically as water exits into
the GoM suggesting a loss in aromaticity
30Summary
- During dry year (04) and wet year (05) no
influence of Gulf of St. Lawrence water entering
GOM and affecting CaseII dissolved conditions. - Dry year (04) showed major loss of CDOM in mid
Gulfphotooxidation? - Aqua-derived DOC values look reasonable
- Clear evidence of nonconservative CDOM behavior
in the Gulf - Have modeled 3-D DOC flow. Future plans to
incorporate DOC non-conservative transformations
31Thank you!
32(No Transcript)
33How do three of the biggest watersheds compare in
the concentration of their DOC (tea)?