AGU Fall MeetingDecember 4, 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

AGU Fall MeetingDecember 4, 2005

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Randall Martin Last modified by: Vijay Natraj Created Date: 8/2/2001 5:09:44 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Randa120
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AGU Fall MeetingDecember 4, 2005


1
Vijay Natraj (California Institute of
Technology) Hartmut Bösch (Jet Propulsion
Laboratory)Yuk Yung (California Institute of
Technology)
Quantifying Aerosol Types and Their Impact on
Trace Gas Retrievals From Satellite Measurements
2
Major Source of Retrieval Uncertainty
3
Global Aerosol Climatology
Courtesy Kahn et al, 2001
4
Aerosol Optical Properties
  • Each mixing group is a combination of 4 different
    aerosol components from a basic set of 7 (Kahn et
    al., 2001).
  • Sulfate (land/water), seasalt, carbonaceous,
    black carbon spherical gt Mie code (de Rooij and
    van der Stap, 1984)
  • Mineral dust (accumulated/coarse) mixture of
    oblate and prolate spheroids gt T-matrix code
    (Mishchenko and Travis, 1998)
  • Lognormal distribution
  • Polarization fully considered

5
Scattering Matrix (755 nm)
6
Forward Model Details
  • Park Falls, Wisconsin, July (SZA 31 degrees)
  • Exponential drop-off in aerosol extinction (scale
    height 1 km, optical depth 0.1)
  • OCO spectral regions
  • Forward model RADIANT (Christi, CSU) single
    scattering approximation for polarization
  • Lorentzian instrument lineshape function
    (resolving powers O2 A band 17000, CO2 bands
    20000)

7
Weighting Functions (O2 A Band)
8
Weighting Functions (Weak CO2 Band)
9
Weighting Functions (Strong CO2 Band)
10
Retrieval Groups Single Scattering Albedo
11
Retrieval Groups Normalized Extinction
Coefficient
12
Sensitivity Tests
  • Measurement error 0.43 ppm
  • Smoothing error 0.29 ppm
  • Error due to incorrect assumption of aerosol type
    within retrieval group
  • Group 1 0.27 ppm
  • Group 2 0.02 ppm
  • Group 3 0.03 ppm

13
Conclusions
  • Aerosol retrieval groups determined from basic
    aerosol mixing groups
  • Choosing incorrect mixing group within retrieval
    group leads to small errors
  • Need to test more scattering geometries to
    validate retrieval types
  • More realistic aerosol profiles need to be
    included

14
Acknowledgments
  • OCO L2 Team (JPL)
  • Matt Christi (CSU)
  • Michael Mishchenko (GISS)
  • Olga Kalashnikova and Ralph Kahn (JPL)

15
Related Talks/Posters
  • Charles Miller (A14C-02)
  • Hartmut Boesch (A12D-05)
  • Gretchen Aleks (A33B-0883)

16
Importance of Polarization
  • Need to consider both atmospheric/surface and
    instrumental polarization
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com