Title: Fish Web Collaborative: Towards an Integrated View of Fish Distribution Information for Ontario
1Fish Web CollaborativeTowards an Integrated
View ofFish Distribution Information for Ontario
- Craig Onafrychuk
- Fisheries Metadata Officer
- Information Management Spatial Analysis Unit
- Southern Science and Information Section
- Ministry of Natural Resources
2Current Situation
- Many agencies and community-based monitoring
groups are collecting fish community and habitat
information - Information is collected using various methods
- Data are stored on agency networks or individual
personal computers - As a result
- Fish distribution data are undiscoverable,
uncoordinated and unstandardized - Difficult to access information on fish
communities and habitat necessary to make
resource management decisions - Difficult to test effects of regulations, habitat
improvements or other management techniques - Difficult to make comparisons across spatial and
temporal scales
3Purpose of the Fish Web Collaborative
- To develop a multi-organizational collaborative
model for the management of fish distribution
data in Ontario and establish a single
standardized source accessible over the Internet - Goals/Results
- Increase communication data sharing
- Reduce costs
- Data analysis increase sample size compare
across time space
4Goal
- Ultimate goal of the project is to provide one
repository of fish data maintained by - multiple organizations and served via web mapping
Source Fisheries Oceans Canada
5Phases of the Fish Web Collaborative
- Phase 1 Develop thematic data standards for fish
distribution information (this project)
completed by Sept 2008 - (Proposed) Phase 2 Publish thematic data on fish
distribution in Ontario waterbodies on the
internet Oct 2008 Oct 2009 - (Proposed) Phase 3 Develop a web-based
application to enable the community of practice
to continue to contribute fish distribution
October 2009 March 2010
6Objectives for Funding
- To develop and implement thematic geospatial data
organized around a particular theme (i.e., Fish
Distribution) - Standards which allow for inter-organizational
exchange and interoperability - Project must be collaborative and support an
identified end-user community
7Phase I Technical Committee Members
Team Members Representing
Provincial Government Provincial Government
Helen Ball, Aquatic Ecologist Leslie McDonald, Fisheries Program Biologist Fisheries Section, Fish Wildlife Branch, MNR
Ola McNeil, Fisheries Information Specialist Inventory, Monitoring Assessment Unit, Science Information Branch, MNR
Silvia Strobl, IMSAU Coordinator James McHattie, IM Specialist Craig Onafrychuk, Fisheries Metadata Officer Trevor Friesen, Fisheries Specialist Southern Science and Information Section, Science Information Branch, MNR
Peter Sorrill, GIS and Data Support Officer Natural Heritage Information Centre, MNR
Harry Taylor, Commercial Fish/Systems Officer Great Lakes Branch, MNR
Conservation Authorities Conservation Authorities
Chris Wilkinson, WRIP Coordinator Conservation Ontario
Samantha Mason, Aquatic Biologist Phil Lenoir, Senior Business Analyst/Programmer Graham Smith, Geomatics Coordinator Grand River Conservation
Federal Government Federal Government
Carolyn Bakelaar, GIS Analyst Department of Fisheries Oceans Canada
International International
Christine Geddes, Great Lakes GIS Project Coordinator Institute for Fisheries Research, University of Michigan
8Technical Team Member Roles
- Provide technical direction
- Empowered to actively participate on behalf of
their organization - Communicate progress to solicit information
from home organization (esp. senior management) - Coordinate the cataloguing of fish distribution
data with Metadata Coordinator - Support delivery of User Needs Workshops
9Phase 1 Thematic Data Standards
10Phase 1 Goals
- Compile a comprehensive list of existing fish
data sources - Document the essential descriptive and
administrative information to support discovery,
access and use of existing fish data sources - Conduct workshops with users to develop a
consensus-based data model
11What is Metadata?
- High-level descriptions which enables the
discovery and analysis of data - At the very least, metadata answers some
fundamental questions about data - Who created the data? Who maintains it?
- What is the content of the data? What is its
structure? - Where was the data collected? Where is it stored?
- When was the data collected? When was it
produced? - Why was the data created? What is the purpose?
- How was it produced? How can it be accessed? What
data quality can you expect?
12Collecting Metadata A Team Approach
- Identify a Metadata Coordinator
- User of standards and tools
- Establish a production process
- Interview method or individual entry
- Common templates
- Engage appropriate specialists
- Data owner (You the practitioner)
- GIS Specialist / Metadata Clerk
Source USGS GeoConnections Training
13Information Entropy
Time of data development
Specific details about problems with individual
items or specific dates are lost relatively
rapidly
General details about data set are lost over time
DATA DETAILS
DATA DETAILS
Retirement or career change makes access to
mental storage difficult or unlikely
Accident or technology change may destroy data
and documentation
Loss of initial data developer results in loss of
remaining records
TIME
Source Michener et al 1996 USGS GeoConnections
Training
14Metadata Interview Components
- General Info
- Dataset name, description, purpose, etc.
- Constraints, time period, key words, storage
- Contact Info
- Mapping Info
- Coordinate system, datum, accuracy
- Geographic Extent
- Business Requirements
- Location (river, lake)
- Protocols (OSAP)
- Fish Attribute Info
- Naming convention, codes,
- sampling techniques, photos
- Water Temperature Info
Source Christine Brousseau, Fisheries Oceans
Canada
15Metadata Standards and Tools
- Ontario Land Information Directory (OLID)
Metadata Directory metadata editor - Catalogue tool and repository
- Metadata records catalogued according to the
Government of Ontario IT Standard (GO-ITS 72)
Geospatial Metadata Standard - Based on the North American Profile of ISO
191152003 - Compliant with Canadian Geospatial Data
Infrastructure (CGDI) endorsed standards - OLID is a registered repository with
GeoConnections and is discoverable via
GeoConnections Discovery Portal
16How is the Fish Web Collaborative Unique?
- Metadata collection is being conducted on behalf
of agency - Maintenance of record is transferred to agency
- Metadata being published prior to data
publication - Ontario Land Information Directory (OLID)
http//lioapp.lrc.gov.on.ca/edwin/edwin.asp - GeoConnections Discovery Portal
http//geodiscover.cgdi.ca/ - Metadata catalogue host
- Conservation Ontario
- http//conservation-ontario.on.ca/projects/fishwe
b.html
17Ontario Land Information Directory
18GeoConnections Discovery Portal
19FWC Catalogue
http//conservation-ontario.on.ca/projects/fishweb
.html
20Interview Status
- Thirteen (14) sites to-date / 18 databases in
total - Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority
- Central Lake Ontario Conservation
- Credit Valley Conservation
- Grand River Conservation Authority
- Grey Sauble Conservation Authority
- Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
- Otonabee Region Conservation Authority
- South Nation Conservation Authority
- Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
- Upper Thames River Conservation Authority
- McMaster, Department of Biology (Coastal Wetland
Research Group) - MNR Guelph District Office Guelph Area
- MNR Guelph District Office Niagara Area
- MNR IMA FishNet 2.0 and 3.0
21Preliminary results (16 databases)
Are you following OSAP? 9
Do you survey waterbodies/streams for temperature? 15
Used a consistent protocol? 7
Do you survey water bodies for fish species presence? 16
Are fish species Common Name recorded? 15
Are fish species Scientific Name recorded? 14
For site location, is a written description solely used? 0
For site location, is a geographic latitude and longitude used? 6
Are survey points captured in Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)? 13
22Preliminary results
Is site location checked against base mapping? 14
Is the site checked against base data in a GIS? 13
Are there restrictions on disseminating your data? 9
Have you produced a Web Map Service (WMS) for any of your geospatial datasets? 6
Do you have a production, development or planned web map service (WMS) server environment? 5(Prod)
Do you have a production, development or planned web map service (WMS) server environment? 7(Dev)
Do you have a production, development or planned web map service (WMS) server environment? 7(Plan)
Do you have a production, development or planned web feature service (WFS) server environment? 0(Prod)
Do you have a production, development or planned web feature service (WFS) server environment? 3(Dev)
Do you have a production, development or planned web feature service (WFS) server environment? 5(Plan)
23Phase 2 Publish Fish Distribution Data (Proposed)
- Publish thematic data of fish distribution in
Ontario waterbodies on the Internet - Users may be able to
- Enter spatial data using existing protocols
- Validate site locations where surveys were
conducted - Access fisheries species data
- Query common attributes generate statistics
- Export selected data for modeling
24Phase 3 Online Data Entry (Proposed)
- Online data entry application
- A web-based set of tools to enable the community
of practice to continue to contribute fish
distribution data - Online data entry forms based on the data model
from Phase 1 - Potential of a batch upload tool
25Potential Framework
Fish Web Collaborative
26Review Fish Websites in North America
27Iowa Rivers Information System
- Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Iowa State
University, and U.S. Geological Survey
28- http//maps.gis.iastate.edu/iris/
29http//maps.gis.iastate.edu/iris/
30http//maps.gis.iastate.edu/iris/data/aquaticgap.j
sp
31http//maps.gis.iastate.edu/iris/data/aquaticgap.j
sp
32Wisconsin Dept of Natural Resources Wisconsin
Aquatic Gap Mapping Application
33http//infotrek.er.usgs.gov/wdnrfish/
34http//infotrek.er.usgs.gov/wdnrfish/
35http//infotrek.er.usgs.gov/wdnrfish/
36Trempaleau River Watershed
http//infotrek.er.usgs.gov/wdnrfish/
37http//infotrek.er.usgs.gov/wdnrfish/
38Northern Pike Abundance
http//infotrek.er.usgs.gov/wdnrfish/
39Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
- Eco Services/Fisheries Fishes of Minnesota
MapServer Application (in development)
40Fishes of Minnesota MapServer Application
- Project Objective
- Serve fish species distribution data over the
Internet - Leverage the Fishes of Minnesota (FOM) database
as the source - Enable users to query by multiple criteria and
display point locations of fish species
occurrences - Create printable species range maps
- Provide a basic introduction to fish species
distribution across Minnesota, with links to
relevant resources
Source Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Fisheries
41Attributes for User Query
- Species
- Scientific name
- Common name
- Group name
- Group common name
- Habitat guild - Adult
- Protection status
- Waterbody Info
- Waterbody type
- Waterbody name
- Lake ID (DOW )
- Stream ID (Kittle )
- Watersheds (Hydrologic Units)
- DNR Lake Watersheds ( HUC16)
- USGS Hydrologic Units 2-14 (HUC2-Huc14)
- Geographic Location
- County
- DNR Fisheries Administrative boundaries
- Collection Info
- Date (start date/end date)
- Gear
- Source
- Voucher
Source Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Fisheries, Minnesota DNR Fishes of MN database
model
42Attributes for Tabular Display
- Scientific name
- Common name
- Catch
- Date
- Voucher
- Waterbody name
- Drainage (HUC4)
- County
- Township
- Township Range
- Township Section
- UTM X
- UTM Y
- Source
- Gear
- Nearest town
Source Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Fisheries, Minnesota DNR Fishes of MN database
model
43Discussion Questions?
- Craig Onafrychuk
- Fisheries Metadata Officer,
- Southern Science and Information, MNR
- Tel 705 755-3288
- craig.onafrychuk_at_ontario.ca