Helping Under-prepared Students Learn Calculus-Based University Physics (Mats Selen, UIUC Department of Physics, July 25, AAPT-2001) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Helping Under-prepared Students Learn Calculus-Based University Physics (Mats Selen, UIUC Department of Physics, July 25, AAPT-2001)

Description:

Title: Physics 106P: Lecture 1 Notes Author: Mats A. Selen Last modified by: Mats Selen Created Date: 12/11/1994 5:20:44 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: Mats65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Helping Under-prepared Students Learn Calculus-Based University Physics (Mats Selen, UIUC Department of Physics, July 25, AAPT-2001)


1
Helping Under-prepared Students Learn
Calculus-Based University Physics (Mats Selen,
UIUC Department of Physics, July 25, AAPT-2001)
  • Building a foundation Physics 100
  • What motivates us
  • Brief overview of our intro physics sequence.
  • Why we need a preparatory course like Physics
    100.
  • Identifying students at risk
  • Self evaluation test.
  • Class structure
  • Pre-flight, Discussion, Homework and Quizzes.
  • Preliminary Results.
  • Is it helping?
  • Follow-up
  • Physics 199M.
  • The Future
  • Web based lectures with audio.
  • NSF sponsored minority scholarship program.

2
Overview of the UICU calc-basedintroductory
physics sequence
  • Taken by all physics engineering undergrads
  • Physics 111 (4 hrs, mechanics)
  • Physics 112 (4 hrs, EM)
  • Physics 113 (2 hrs, thermo/stat-mech)
  • Physics 114 (2 hrs, waves/quantum)
  • Taken by about 4000 students per year

Most freshmen start here
In Phase
Out of Phase
3
Why a preparatory course?
  • Despite the University of Illinois C of E high
    admission standards, nearly 20 of accepted
    students are inadequately prepared to pass our
    introductory mechanics course (i.e. they earn a D
    or F).
  • The failure rate is even higher for minority
    groups.
  • As high as 68 for African Americans.
  • Many students do not realize that they are poorly
    prepared.
  • We need to identify inadequately prepared
    students and help them gear up for Physics 111
    and beyond.

4
Student Selection
  • Self evaluation quiz is offered in the Fall
    semester to all freshman in the College of
    Engineering as well as all students enrolled in
    physics 111.
  • Students receiving a score below a certain cutoff
    are invited to take Physics 100 (1 credit-hour).
  • Much less than half of identified students choose
    to participate initially.
  • This should really be a placement exam!
  • Physics 100 does not officially start until about
    3 weeks into the fall semester.
  • Gives students time to evaluate their situation
  • Many decide to take Physics 100 after doing
    poorly on the first Physics 111 mid-term exam.
  • Typical Physics 100 enrollment 100

5
The Self Evaluation
  • Tests basic math and physics background.
  • Students take this (individually) on the web.
  • No time pressure while taking test.
  • They can try the test as many times as they want
    to (before deadline), although they are not given
    feedback until after the deadline.
  • Consists of 16 multiple choice questions.
  • 8 of these (found the most predictive) are used
    to arrive at their score.
  • Students that get less than half right are
    invited to take Physics 100.

6
Example Self Evaluation Questions
  • Did you take high school physics?
  • (a) Yes
  • (b) No
  • (c) Yes but it was lousy

(Background)
7
Example Self Evaluation Questions
  • Here we have two vectors V and W. The angle
    between these vectors is A.
  • 1) What is the component of V parallel to W in
    terms of A and the magnitudes of V and W?
  • (a) V
  • (b) W
  • (c) V sin(A)
  • (d) V cos(A)
  • (e) W sin(A)
  • (f) W cos(A)

(Basic trig)
8
Example Self Evaluation Questions
  • An oarsman can row his boat 3 mph is still water.
    He sets out on the Illinois River, which flows at
    5 mph. We are interested in what an observer on
    shore measures.
  • 1) When the man heads the boat directly
    downstream and rows as fast as he can, how fast
    does the observer on shore see the boat going?
  • (a) 2 mph (b) 3 mph (c) 5 mph (d) 7 mph (e) 8
    mph
  • 2) When the man heads the boat directly
    downstream and rows as fast as he can, which
    direction does the observer on shore see the boat
    going?
  • (a) upstream (b) downstream

(reasoning)
9
Example Self Evaluation Questions
  • The force on an object in uniform circular motion
    is given by F mv2/r.
  • 1) Consider two equal mass objects moving around
    the same circle, one with speed V1 and one with
    speed V2, where V1 2V2. What is the ratio of
    the forces on these objects?
  • (a) F1/F2 1
  • (b) F1/F2 2
  • (c) F1/F2 4
  • (d) F1/F2 1/2
  • (e) F1/F2 1/4

(scaling)
10
Self evaluation Physics 111 correlation
11
Class Structure
  • Weekly cycle
  • Textbook reading assignment
  • Web Based Homework (based on reading)
  • Traditional problems.
  • Interactive Examples (IEs).
  • Unlimited tries before deadline, immediate
    feedback.
  • Web Based Preflight (JITT)
  • Provides information to instructor prior to
    discussion section.
  • Graded on participation only
  • Discussion (2-hour capstone)
  • Group problem solving facilitated by instructor
  • Graded on participation
  • Also
  • Three web-based quizzes
  • Written (M/C) final exam

No Lecture
12
Traditional Homework
13
Limited help available
14
Interactive Examples (Socratic Dialogue)
Start by asking a numeric question(usually
multi-step)
when students click in Help
15
Help results in a discussion followed by some
multiple-choice questions that lead them toward
the answer
16
This dialogue can take several steps
17
these steps are designed toteach students
problem solvingapproaches as well as physics
18
Eventually they get another (simpler) numeric
question whoseanswer is needed to solve the
primary numeric question.
19
Clicking on Help again results in asimilar
dialogue as the first time,although one level
deeper. - Problems can be 4-5 levels deep -
Eventually they get enough info to solve the
problem.
20
Once they get right the answer
They get arecap
And somefollow-upquestions
21
Interactive Example Features
  • Created to develop concept based problem solving
    skill.
  • Quantitative Problems
  • Socratic help
  • Conceptual Analysis
  • Strategic Analysis
  • Quantitative Analysis
  • Recap
  • Follow up questions

22
Student Logs
  • We record all student submissions on IEs (the
    conversation)

23
This is Research data!
  • How much time do students spend on the IEs?
  • How well do the students do on their first
    response to questions?
  • How deep into the IE do students go?

24
Pre-Flights
  • Due before discussion (6am Monday)
  • Used by instructor to guide discussion work
  • Graded on participation only

(This was Mondays talk)
25
Discussion Section
  • Students work in groups on problems designed
    after examining homework preflight answers.
  • Purpose is to tie up loose ends.
  • Students should leave understanding everything
    done during the previous week.
  • i.e. reading, homework, preflights are capped off
    by discussion.
  • Graded on attendance participation

26
Are we helping students ?
27
Are we helping students
Can we reduce the failure rate of under-prepared
students in Physics 111/112/113/114 ? Probably
YES (research by Gladding Shoaf)
28
DISTRIBUTION OF FINAL GRADES Physics 100 alumni
All Physics 111 taking Physics 111
students
29
Soare we helping ??
  • It seems like we might be, however there is a is
    a big caveat Physics 100 students are self
    selected !
  • Are we getting only those students that were
    going to do well anyway ?
  • We need more data to study this.
  • A real placement test would be very helpful !

30
Follow Up
  • Alumni of Physics 100 test to need/want more help
    with physics as they work through the Physics
    111/112 sequence.
  • We now offer 1-hour courses for Physics 100
    graduates that parallel the regular Physics 111
    (spring) and 112 (fall) courses.
  • Weekly 2-hour tutorial sections.
  • Graded on participation only.
  • Although we know the students are very happy with
    these, we are presently attempting to quantify
    the effect.
  • Small statistics so far.

31
The Future
  • So far, results are encouraging however, we
    would like to verify the validity of the Self
    Evaluation test.
  • Placement test.
  • Quantify the effects of the course.
  • Increase Minority Participation.
  • NSF Grant to fund minority participation program.
  • Working together with office of Minority
    Engineering Program ( M.E.P.) at U. of I.
  • Web-based interactive lectures with audio.
  • Students want to have a formal lecture.
  • Cant do this formally and keep low time impact.
  • Next best thing may be web-based lecture notes.
  • Sound will provide extra dimension.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com