Title: Modeling Salt Redistribution in Fractured Porous Media Caused by
1Modeling Salt Redistribution in Fractured Porous
Media Caused by Convection Driven Evaporation
Within the Fracture Christopher Graham1 Maria
Ines Dragila1, Clay Cooper2, Noam Weisbrod3 (1)
Department of Crop Soil Sciences, Oregon State
University, USA (2) Desert Research
Institute(3) Department of Environmental
Hydrology Microbiology, Institute for Water
Sciences Technologies, BIDR, Ben-Gurion
University of the Negev, Israel
METHODS
RESULTS
FURTHER RESULTS and CONCLUSIONS
INTRODUCTION
- Effect of Permeability Modification
- Permeability reduction greatly reduces cumulative
evaporation. 100 day cumulative evaporation
decreases 56 with a reduction of permeability
from 1E-13 to 1E-15 m2. - Salt flux to the fracture is similarly reduced,
with a 88 reduction in salt flux over the 100
day simulation. - Matrix permeability clearly has a large impact on
evaporation and salt flux dynamics.
Simulation Fracture Salt Total Evaporation
(Y/N) g/L of Control
Control N 0 100.0
Fracture Y 0 120.5
Low Salt Y 15 116.6
High Salt Y 100 100.1
- Objective
- Numerical investigation of solute redistribution
within the porous matrix caused by evaporation
from a fracture in the matrix.
Permeability 100 Day Total Evap Average Daily Evap Solid Salt Precipitation Near Fracture
(m2) (kg) (mm/day) ( Pore Space)
1E-13 1.96 0.65 3.10
1E-14 1.13 0.38 0.81
1E-15 0.85 0.28 0.35
- Evaporation Dynamics
- Evaporation rate and total evaporation were
enhanced by the presence of the fracture. - Daily evaporation rate and total evaporation were
reduced with increasing solute concentration. - Water content decreased with increased proximity
to fracture, with greater decrease seen with
reduced salt concentration
- Justification
- Evaporation from fractures that are open to the
atmosphere will lead to salt crusting along the
surface which can then either close the fracture
or be flushed down to the aquifer during rain
events.
Table 1 Simulation initial conditions and
results.
Table 1 Permeability simulation results.
- Questions investigated
- How does evaporation from fractures and salt
concentration affect total soil evaporation? - How does evaporation from fracture affect salt
redistribution?
Figure 3 Physical model based on Ritchie and
Adams (1972) weighing lysimeter. 5 cm slice
represents entire lysimeter due to symmetry.
Full depth is modeled.
Cumulative Evaporation (kg)
Water Content
- Boundary Conditions
- Lower Constant Head (Gravity Drainage)
- Upper Constant Head (Atmospheric Boundary)
- Right No Flow (Lysimeter edge)
- Upper Left Constant Head (Fracture Atmospheric
Conditions) - Lower Left No Flow (for Symmetry)
- Model Details
- Soil lysimeter is modeled using a representative
5 cm slice, 60 wide and 120 cm deep. - Hydraulic properties of Houston Black Clay are
modeled using the van Genuchten curves using
parameters for clay from Carsel and Parrish. - Lower boundary is constant head, allowing for
gravity drainage, right and left boundaries are
no flow, for symmetry. Upper boundary and
fracture are constant head, representing a well
mixed atmosphere.
A
B
C
Time (days)
Distance from fracture (m)
Figure 8 Cumulative evaporation for 100 day
simulations, with and without fracture and with
and without salt.
Figure 7 Water content with distance from
fracture at end of 100 day simulations, with and
without fracture and salt
Figure 12 Cumulative evaporation for 100 day
simulations, with varying matrix permeability.
Figure 13 Total solid phase salt precipitation
over time with varying matrix permeability
MODEL CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION
- Salt Flux
- Salt content in the 1 cm nearest the fracture
increased over 300 over the 100 day simulations. - A larger increase of 350 was seen in the low
initial salt concentration simulation (not
shown). - Salt flux is a combination of positive advective
salt flux and negative diffusive flux.
Throughout the simulation advective flux
overwhelms diffusive flux, though net flux
decreases throughout the simulation. - Flux is greatest nearest the fracture at early
time, reversing later in the simulation.
- Conclusions
- 100 day cumulative and daily evaporation
increased with presence of fracture. - Fracture evaporation caused increased drying at
all depths in soil column. - Increased pore salinity reduced daily and
cumulative evaporation. - Reduced soil permeability decreased evaporation
and salt flux. - Salt levels increased near the fracture during
course of simulations due to transport with water
driven by matric potential gradient caused by
evaporation.
- Laboratory Data
- While the EWASG module of TOUGH2 has been shown
to accurately model saturated and unsaturated
water and salt flux, and solid phase salt
precipitation, its capabilities regarding
evaporation are untested. - A small scale evaporation experiment was
constructed and simulated using the EWASG module
of TOUGH2. - A hydrometer cylinder was filled with saturated
sand and allowed to evaporate for 80 days. - Simulated results closely matched experimental
data with minor modifications to the standard
modeling procedures.
Figure 2 A) Fracturing and salt precipitation
driven by evaporation in clay soil. B) Extreme
salt precipitation on sandstone surface. C)
Salt precipitation on sandstone and chalk
surfaces.
- Implications
- While the fracture increased evaporation by less
than the amount predicted by Ritchie and Adams
(1974), this amount can have a significant impact
on agricultural water balances, especially in
arid ecosystems, which account for one third of
the Earths landmass. - Enhanced evaporation due to soil fractures has
implications on water balance for agricultural
lands as well as natural arid ecosystems such as
shallow seasonal lakes in arid environments. - Salt on the surface of fractures lies in
preferential flow paths to the subsurface. In
areas such as the Negev Desert of Israel, salt
filled rock fractures penetrate meters deep into
the subsurface, potentially creating preferential
flow paths to the aquifer. This situation
creates the possibility of salt contamination of
subsurface aquifers.
F. Botts
- Numerical Simulator TOUGH2
- TOUGH2 is a three dimensional, multiphase,
multicomponent, finite difference porous media
simulator capable of handling severe permeability
differences between elements. - The EWASG module of TOUGH2 is designed to
simulate water, saline and air fluxes in porous
media. EWASG models salt in both the aqueous and
solid phases.
Distance from fracture (m)
Figure 4 Simulation and experimental results.
First stage evaporation duration and second stage
evaporation rates are accurately modeled.
- Evaporation and Salt Diffusion
- Evaporation and Salt Diffusion are modeled as
Fickian Diffusion between elements, according to
a soil matrix dependent version of Ficks Law
- Moisture and Advective Salt Flux
- Soil pore water flux is governed by Darcys Law,
and advective salt flux is a function of this
flux
Figure 5 Scale and hydrometer lab setup
- References
- Carsel, R.F., and R.S. Parrish. 1988. Developing
joint probability of soil water retention
characteristics. Water Resources Research
24755-769. - OHara, S. L. 1997 Irrigation and land
degradation implications for agriculture in
Turkmenistan, central Asia. Journal of Arid
Environments 37(1)165-179 - Pruess, K., C. Oldenburg, and G. Moridis. 1999.
TOUGH2 User's Guide, Version 2.0 Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley. - Ritchie, J.T., and J.E. Adams. 1974. Field
measurement of evaporation from soil shrinkage
fractures. Soil Science Society of America
38131-134. - van Genuchten, M.T. 1980. A closed form equation
for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of
unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of
America 44892-898. - Weisbrod, N., M. Dragila, C. Graham, and J.
Cassidy. 2005. Evaporation from fractures exposed
at the land surface impact of gas-phase
convection on salt accumulation Dynamics of
Fluids and Transport in Fractured Rock. American
Geophysical Union, submitted August 2004.
- Field Data
- Based on soil fracture and lysimeter described in
Ritchie and Adams (1974). - Lysimeter is filled with Houston Black Clay
- Soil lysimeter has cross sectional area of 1.83 m
x 1.83 m and depth of 1.2 m. - fracture is 50 cm deep, with surface width of 5
cm, running from corner to corner of lysimeter.
f diffusive flux f porosity t0matrix
dependent tortuosity T saturation dependent
tortuosityD diffusion coefficientDX change in
mass fraction salt between elements.
F advective fluxk(q) relative permeabilityA
cross sectional areaX mass fraction salt in
elementDy change in matric potentialDx
distance between elements
Figure 6 Water content iso lines Ritchie and
Adams field data (left), and TOUGH2 numeric
simulation (right).