Title: Chapter 18: Interpretation of Contracts
1- Chapter 18 Interpretation of Contracts
2Intent
- Because a contract is based on the agreement of
the parties, courts must determine the intent of
the parties manifested in the contract. - The intent that is to be enforced is the intent
as it reasonably appears to a third person. - This objective intent is followed, and the
subjective or secret intent is ignored because
recognition of secret intention would undermine
the stability of contracts and open the door to
fraud.
3Interpretation of Contracts
- In interpreting a contract, ordinary words are to
be given their ordinary meanings. - If trade or technical terms have been used, they
are interpreted according to their technical
meanings. - The court must consider the whole contract and
not read a particular part out of context. - When different writings are executed as part of
the same transaction, or one writing refers to or
incorporates another, all the writings usually
are to be read together as the contract of the
parties.
4Conflicting Terms
- When provisions of a contract are contradictory,
the court will try to reconcile or eliminate the
conflict. - If this cannot be done, the conclusion may be
that there is no contract because the conflict
makes the agreement indefinite as to a material
matter. - In some cases, conflict is solved by considering
the form of conflicting terms. - Handwriting prevails over typing and a printed
form, and typing prevails over a printed form.
5Eliminating Ambiguity
- Ambiguity will be eliminated in some cases by the
admission of parol evidence. - Sometimes courts will interpret the ambiguous
provision strictly against the party preparing
the contract, especially if that party has
significantly greater bargaining power.
6Reasonableness and Good Faith
- In most cases, the parties are held to their
contract exactly as it has been written. - In other cases, the courts will imply that
performance is to be made within a reasonable
time and that details of performance are
reasonable when the contract fails to be specific
on these points. - Also, the law will imply an obligation to act in
good faith.
7Conflict of Laws
- When a contract has interstate aspects, it is
necessary to determine which states law governs
it. - The rules that govern that decision are called
the law of conflict of laws. - The parties may specify the jurisdiction whose
law is to govern. - If that jurisdiction bears a reasonable
relationship to the contract, the choice will be
given effect by the court.
8Conflict of Laws (Contd)
- In the absence of such a provision, some courts
will apply the older rule that - the law of the state where the contract was made
prevails in most matters - the law of the state where performance is to be
made prevails in matters relating to performance - The modern, or center-of-gravity, view is to
choose the jurisdiction that has the most
significant relationship to the parties, the
contract, and its performance.
9Conflict of Laws
Place of Contracting Law of the state where the
contract was made. The state in which the last
act essential to the formation of the contract
was performed.
- contract validity as to substance
- satisfaction of requirements as to form
Place of Performance Law of state where the
contract is to be performed.
- performance of the contract
- excuse or liability for nonperformance
- measure of damages for nonperformance
Center of Gravity Law of the state with the most
significant contacts--place of contracting,
negotiating, and performing location of subject
matter of the contract domicile (residence),
states of incorporation, principal place of
business of parties--governs.
10Diversity of Citizenship
- When an action is brought in a federal court
because it involves citizens of different states
(diversity of citizenship), the federal court
must apply the conflict of laws principles that
would be applied by the courts of the state in
which the federal court is sitting.