PLASC/NPD User Group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

PLASC/NPD User Group

Description:

PLASC/NPD User Group Mick Quinlan (Mick.Quinlan_at_naa.org.uk) Change, or the lack of it The Players: suppliers and users NC assessment process A wander through the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: bethan
Category:
Tags: npd | plasc | group | user

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PLASC/NPD User Group


1
PLASC/NPD User Group
  • Mick Quinlan (Mick.Quinlan_at_naa.org.uk)
  • Change, or the lack of it
  • The Players suppliers and users
  • NC assessment process
  • A wander through the book an A-Z of the
    collection of NC assessment data

2
Forward
  • Id like to change the current process but
  • there are many players in the game each with
    existing systems and many dependencies
  • were not good at managing change!

3
Drivers for Change
  • 1998 Service delivery failure of data collection
    exercise
  • 1999 Rose report Weighing the Baby
  • 2004 Beasley report service delivery failure of
    KS3 English test results
  • 2005 Statistics Commission report 23 measuring
    standards in English Primary schools
  • 2005 Statistics Commission report 26 school
    education statistics user perspectives
  • 2006 NAO 3rd validation compendium report
    quality of data systems underpinning PSA targets
  • Broadly appropriate but system needs strengthening

4
Metadata
  • Statistics Commission 23, Feb 2005, 11
  • We feel that public presentation of the KS scores
    in statistical releases should include a clear
    statement about the uses to which the data may be
    put, and the limitations of the data in respect
    of those uses
  • Statistics Commission 26, June 2005, D
  • Full and informative statistical commentary
    should be provided alongside the figures to guide
    users

5
Making Good Progress
6
Changes for 2006
  • KS2/3 Electronic collection of TA, including
    pupil-level non-core results for KS3, via S2S
    rather than OMR forms
  • A decision has been taken by the Departments
    Head of Profession for Statistics not to provide
    this data until the quality and robustness can be
    assured (SFR34-2006)
  • KS3 English Richard III in, Henry V out
  • KS3 ICT onscreen test 2nd pilot (170,000 pupils)

7
The Players DfES
  • DfES Paymaster/customer (TRD)
  • School Census/NPD and FSP/KS1 data collection
  • EduBase
  • School Self-Evaluation/Improvement
  • Autumn Package (benchmarks, progress, target
    setting)
  • PAT/RAISEonline)
  • School Accountability - Performance Tables
  • SERAP, FORVUS, FFT
  • National Statistics
  • Statistical First Releases
  • PSA Targets

8
The Players NAA
  • A division of QCA (the Regulator)
  • Managers of the process
  • Test development (NFER, Edexcel, UCLES, RM)
  • Pupil registration (DfES, schools)
  • Test Printing/Distribution (COI/Granby)
  • Test marking (Edexcel)
  • Teacher Assessments (schools, LAs)
  • Data capture (Pearson)
  • Non-standard processes (in-house)

9
The Process
Schools
Borderlined scripts borderlined marksheets
school report (inc. marks/levels)
Script Revised mark and level
TeacherAssessments
Request forReview
Request forProcess review
MarkerStandardisation
7.9
Jul/Aug
7.15
Jul
7.13
Oct
7.2
May-Jun
Samplescripts
Guidance
Mark and level
Investigatereview
Marked scripts
Mark and level
Upheldreview
Dataentry
MarkScripts
Borderlining
7.14
Oct/Nov
7.8
Jun-Aug
7.1
7.7
May/Jun
Jun
Re-review
R1 Clericalcheck
Samplescripts
Cut scores
Returnedscripts
7.12
Jul/Aug
DC resultsdatabase
Script pool collection
Level-settingdata collection
Re-markedscript
R2 IndividualRe-marking
7.3
7.5
May/Jun
May
Selected scripts
7.10
Jul/Aug
Malpractice
Scriptscrutiny
Level- setting
R3/GR Group review
7.14
May/Jul
Recom-mend-ation
7.4
Jun
Special consideration
7.6
Jun
7.11
Jul/Sep
Pretest 2 Draft Level thresholds
May/Jun
7.13
10
A is for Assessment
  • National Curriculum
  • key stages Foundation, KS1, KS2, KS3
  • Subjects
  • core English, maths science
  • Attainment Targets
  • non-core Art Design, DT, Geography, History,
    ICT, MFL, Music and PE
  • Test/Task Teacher Assessment
  • Levels

11
Levels
  • Q Whats the difference between Level 4 and
    Level 5?
  • A 1 mark
  • Making Good Progress (KS2-KS3,page 9)
  • This shows that 15 pupils did not progress by
    a full level since finishing KS2 and three
    have actually regressed

12
A
  • A pupil Absent from the test
  • Aegrotat
  • Achievement Attainment Tables
  • Age Standardised Scores (ASS)
  • Additional time
  • Appeals (process reviews)

13
BCD
  • B Working Below the level of the test
  • Borderlining
  • Braille
  • Compensatory award
  • Classes/Teaching Groups collected in 1997
  • D pupil Disapplied from the curriculum
  • Date of Birth

14
E
  • E Exceptional Performance
  • Extension Papers
  • Early takers
  • Errors

15
FGH
  • F Future sitting (subjects early takers not
    taking)
  • Fine grade
  • Foot and mouth
  • Gender
  • Handwriting

16
IJKL
  • Independent schools
  • L pupil Left school (KS2/3)
  • L below Level 2 in the reading comprehension
    test (KS1)

17
MNO
  • M Missing scripts
  • Maladministration/malpractice
  • Missing pages
  • Mental Maths test
  • Modified large print (MLP)
  • N No test level (too few marks gained)
  • Names, of pupils
  • Overseas/Offshore schools
  • Optional tests (Y3-5 Y7/8)

18
PQR
  • P Past sitting (subjects early takers took last
    year)
  • Progress tests (Year 7)
  • P Scales
  • Q result annulled - malpractice (DfES)
  • Reading
  • Reviews
  • Re-sits

19
ST
  • Service Childrens Education (SCE) Schools
  • Special Consideration
  • Shakespeare
  • Sub-Levels
  • Spelling test
  • T Pupil unable to access the tests
  • Tier

20
UVW
  • U No TA subject Level calculated (KS1)
  • Unique Pupil Number (UPN)
  • V mixed tiers
  • Versions
  • W Working towards Level 1
  • Writing

21
XYZ
  • X Marks pending (KS2/3)
  • X pupil not entered for reading comprehension
    test (KS1)
  • Year groups
  • Z ineligible pupil
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com