International Networks in Public Health - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

International Networks in Public Health

Description:

Title: International Networks in Public Health & the benefit to National Networks Author: Birminghamm Last modified by: Birminghamm Created Date – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:143
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: Birmin2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: International Networks in Public Health


1
International Networks in Public Health the
linkage with National Networks
Dr Maureen BirminghamWHO representative to
Thailand
2
This presentation
  • Definition of a network
  • Roles of a public health network
  • Examples - CDs, NCDs, surveillance
  • What makes a good network?

3
What is a Network?
  • an interconnected system of things or people
  • an association of individuals having a common
    interest, formed to provide mutual assistance,
    helpful information, or the like

4
Role of Public Health Networks
  • Sharing to strengthen capacity or inform those
    who need to know (on a specific issue)
  • Experiences
  • Knowledge
  • Expertise
  • Methods/tools
  • Information/data
  • Collaborate on a specific issue or problem(e.g.
    research network)
  • Advocate for needed actions/resources

5
Some examples
  • NCDnet

6
Global Network to combat Non-Communicable
Diseases NCDnet
Mission Help implement the global Strategy Action Plan
Catalyze country-level implementation
Raise awareness
Increase resource availability
7
Growing importance of Non-Communicable Diseases
(NCDs) Cause of deaths in the world
25 million
2.3M
6.8 M
Source
20 million
2.3M
3.7M
15 million
10.2M
13.6M
10 million
0.5M
5.9M
0.6M
3.3 M
3.3M
3.0M
3.0M
1.1M
0.9M
High-income countries
Lower middle-income
Upper middle-income
Low-income countries
Group III - Injuries
Low-income countries
Group II Other deaths from noncommunicable
diseases
Group II Premature deaths from noncommunicable
diseases (below the age of 60), which are
preventable
Group I Communicable diseases, maternal,
perinatal and nutritional conditions
8
Advocacy to promote action There are low cost
interventions to prevent NCDs
Disease/risk factor Intervention Cost of implementation (Low lt I1 per capita High gt I2 per capita) Health impact (DALYs per 1m popn) (Small lt 100 Large gt 1,000) Cost-effectiveness (I per DALY averted) (Very lt GDP per capita Quite 1-3 GDP per capita)
Risk factors Tobacco use Excise tax on tobacco products Low Large Very cost-effective
Risk factors Tobacco use Smoke-free workplaces Low Modest Quite cost-effective
Risk factors Tobacco use Packaging, labelling and awareness countermeasures Low Modest Very cost-effective
Risk factors Tobacco use Comprehensive ad bans Low Modest Very cost-effective
Risk factors Harmful use of alcohol Excise tax on alcoholic beverages Low Modest Very cost-effective
Risk factors Unhealthy diet and physical inactivity Reduce salt intake Low Large Very cost-effective
Risk factors Unhealthy diet and physical inactivity Food taxes (fat) and subsidies (fruit and vegetables) Low Modest Very cost-effective
Risk factors Unhealthy diet and physical inactivity Intensive counselling Very high Large Quite cost-effective
NCDs Diabetes Glycaemia control High Large Quite cost-effective
NCDs Cardiovascular diseases Hypertension drug treatment Low Large Very cost-effective
NCDs Cancer Treatment of 1st stage breast cancer Low Modest Very cost-effective
NCDs Cervical cancer screening (PAP smear) and treatment Low Modest Very cost-effective
NCDs Respiratory disorders Inhaled corticoid-steroids for asthma Low Small Quite cost-effective
9
Advocacy to create new perspectives on NCDs and
investments to control them
World Economic Forum Global Risk 2010 Report
10
Communicating a clear global vision on how to
move forward
11
Roadmap for implementation in countries
  • 6 objectives
  • 1. Raise priority of NCDs integrate NCDs control
    into all public policies
  • 2. Strengthen national policies and programmes
  • 3. Address risk factors
  • 4. Prioritize research
  • 5. Strengthen partnerships
  • 6. Monitor NCD trends

12
SEANET-NCD
  • Objectives
  • Contribute to the global efforts
  • Facilitate national NCD networks
  • Share experience, expertise, resources
  • Collaborate in research
  • Advocate mobilize resources
  • Strengthen national NCD policies and strategies
  • Support capacity building

13
What is INFOSAN?
  • A global network of national food safety
    authorities, established in 2004 to
  • Promote information exchange of important food
    safety issues
  • Respond to food safety emergencies
  • Help countries strengthen their capacity to
    manage food safety risks
  • As of today, there are 177 country members of
    INFOSAN

14
Structure of INFOSAN
INFOSAN Secretariat International Food Safety
Authorities Network
WHO surveillance response
systems
Advisory Group
INFOSAN Focal point in Food Safety Authority
INFOSAN Focal point in Agriculture Sector
INFOSAN Focal point in other Sectors
INFOSAN Emergency Contact Point
INFOSAN Focal point in Health Sector
INFOSAN Focal point in Trade Sector
Counterparts across the farm to table continuum
15
(No Transcript)
16
ExampleMelamine Contamination of Infant Formula
  • Melamine added in the primary production sector
    (milk collection centres) to disguise the
    dilution of milk with water
  • 22 of 79 Chinese producers of powdered infant
    formula were affected
  • Products from affected producers exported to 5
    countries
  • Levels detected range from lt0.1 2600 mg/kg

gt294,000 children ill gt50,000 hospitalized 6
deaths
17
Other products contaminated
  • milk (powder), yoghurt, biscuits, instant
    liquid coffee preparations
  • egg powder, fresh eggs, animal feed
  • Sodium bicarbonate (raising agent)
  • Exports reported all over the world

18
(No Transcript)
19
Measures Taken by INFOSAN
  • Secured websites
  • INFOSAN provided regular updates of information
    to its emergency network
  • Close collaboration with Chinese MOH
  • Collaboration with affected countries to verify
    information and provide alerts
  • Assistance to countries on laboratory
    information, analytical methods, safety limits
    etc.
  • Public Websites
  • Special websites set up to provide continuous
    updates to the public

20
(No Transcript)
21
The global polio eradication initiative
22

Global Laboratory Network for Polio Eradication N
145 laboratories
















































































































































Specialised Reference Laboratory
Regional Reference Laboratory
National/ Sub-national Laboratory
23
Structure of the polio laboratory network Every
country need not have the same capacity
networking provides access to services
Liaises with immunization surveillance personnel
24
Mekong Malaria Programme networking
ACTMalaria Foundation Armed Forces Research
Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS) American
Refugee Committee (ARC) Asian Development Bank
(ADB) Bill Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) CDC
MOH Thailand (TUC) Center for Disease Control
(CDC) Atlanta Family Health International
(FHI) Health Unlimited (HU) Institute Pasteur
Cambodia Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM)
Antwerp, Belgium International Office for
Migrations (IOM) INTERPOL Japanese Ministry of
Health Kenan Institute Asia (Kenan) Mahidol-Oxford
-Wellcome-trust Research Unit (MORU) Malaria
Consortium Management Sciences for Health
(MSH/RPM) MEASURE / evaluation Medecins Sans
Frontieres (MSF) Medicine for Malaria Venture
(MMV) MEKONG COUNTRIES(MOH) National academies /
Research Institutions Partners for Development
(PFD) Population Services International
(PSI) SEAMEO TROPMED SOKHLO Malaria Research Unit
(SMRU) Tropical Diseases Research
(TDR) University Research Co (URC) US
Pharmacopeia / DQI USAID-RDM-Asia World Food
Programme (WFP) WHO Collaborating Centers WHO
25
Technical Networking Workshop every 2-3 years
since 1999 Last technical consultation in Phuket,
Thailand in September 2007
26
Build evidence of malaria drug resistance,
Prepare a multi-country response
27
Qinghaosu - Artemisinins
Rapid action, broad stage specificity, safe,
gametocytocidal
28
More study sites of the intensified TES
(Therapeutic Efficacy Studies) network to better
understand malaria drug resistance
29
Artemisinin resistance, the doom scenario
30
EWGLINET
  • European surveillance scheme for
    travel-associated legionnaires' disease network
  • aims
  • reduce incidence of travel associated
    legionellosis
  • provide an early warning system
  • objectives
  • maintain a European surveillance
  • detect a common source
  • inform all those need to know about
    travel-associated Legionellosis
  • inform the public

31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Strengthening Global Networksfor Health Security
34
Epidemics and Pandemics have shaped our history
35
They continue to threaten us..
WHO has detected assessed gt 2,800 events during
2001 to 2009
36
Modeling EID events Relative risk of an EID
Hot Spots global distribution of relative risk
of an EID event caused by zoonotic pathogens from
wildlife, (Jones Nature, 2008).
37
The Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network
(GOARN)
  • Assist countries with disease control efforts
  • Investigate events and assess risks of rapidly
    emerging epidemic disease threats
  • Support national outbreak preparedness

38
GOARN includes gt 190 technical institutions and
networks coordinating actions and resources to
respond to public health events of international
concern.
39
GOARN partners have provided experts for gt 104
operations in 75 countries for 197 missions.
40
GOARN deployments (as of April 2009)
Disease outbreaks Deployments
Ebola 10 286
Avian Influenza 21 206
Marburg 2 122
SARS 5 81
Yellow Fever 8 58
Cholera 3 52
Rift Valley Fever 5 42
Tsunami 3 40
Meningitis 2 14
Other 17 168
Total 76 1007
41
GOARN direct technical assistance and field
support
  • Materials
  • Expertsepidemiology, public health, infection
    control, case management, risk communication,
    crisis management, logistics, laboratory,
    contingency planning
  • Teams
  • multi-disciplinary experts
  • Funding

42
GOARN and Specialist Networks
COMBI (Health education)
EDPLN (BSL4 laboratories)
Clinical
GOARN
43
What makes a good network
  • Clear purpose
  • Mutual benefits for all involved
  • Ownership
  • Clear roles deliverables
  • Complementary and efficient division of labor
  • Sufficient resources
  • Accountability
  • Spirit of comradery togetherness

44
Conclusion
  • Networks exist usually to share something or
    solve something of shared interest
  • Networks can help provide access to information,
    expertise, methods, tools
  • Networks can be more efficient and effective than
    working alone

45
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com