United States Department of Transportation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

United States Department of Transportation

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author: JAD2321 Last modified by: Ron Wormsley Created Date: 2/14/2006 6:19:03 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: JAD28
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: United States Department of Transportation


1
United States Department of Transportation Office
of Inspector General

United States Department of Labor Office of
Labor Racketeering and Fraud Investigations
2
Multi-Agency Investigation
  • United States Attorneys Office
  • Eastern District of New York
  • Chief and Deputy Chief of Public Integrity
    Division
  • US DOT/OIG
  • US DOL/OIG
  • Port Authority of New York New Jersey OIG
  • New York City Department of Investigation

3
CASE OVERVIEW
Investigative Techniques
Judicial Actions
  • Allegations
  • Multi-target investigation
  • Enforcement Actions
  • Search Warrants
  • Arrest Warrants
  • Interviews
  • Cooperation provides information against other
    potential targets
  • Document analysis
  • Search Warrant Materials
  • Computer forensics
  • Recorded Conversations
  • Indictments/Informations
  • Trial
  • Convictions
  • Sentencings

4
SubcontractorCase Summary
  • Allegations of employee kickbacks
  • Owners required employees to kickback a
    percentage of paycheck, on public works projects.
  • Allegations of prevailing wage fraud
  • Participation in Contractors Benefits Trust (CBT)
  • Company would contribute supplemental benefits or
    fringe benefits to CBT for non-union workers than
    remit payment from CBT to union members locals
    to pay for the union members benefits.

5
Investigative Techniques(Subcontractor)
  • SW executed at the office of the subcontractor
  • Interviews of employees
  • Interviews with the Subcontractor
  • VP and part owner of the subcontracting company
  • Admits to kickback scheme
  • Admits to destruction of evidence
  • Admits to payoffs to an Executive of a General
    Contracting Company
  • Admits to prevailing wage fraud scheme with a
    Labor Law Attorney
  • Bookkeeper of the subcontracting company
  • Corroborates VPs admissions and provides
    further cooperation

6
Subcontractor(Cooperation)
Allegations
Allegations
  • Executive of General Contracting Company
  • Requested 5 kickbacks on all of the
    subcontracting companys requisitions to the GC,
    in exchange for expedited payments and future
    subcontracts.
  • Executive received approximately 180,000 in cash
    payoffs.
  • Labor Lawyer
  • In recorded conversation lawyer admits to the
    inappropriate use of CBT.
  • Instructs subcontractor to destroy information on
    a USB device after being advised that device
    contained information about the fraudulent CBT
    transactions.

7
Subcontractor(Cooperation)
  • Cooperating subcontractor consents to concealed
    recordings with Executive.
  • Multiple in person meetings were conducted
  • Conversations were recorded by LEOs
  • Use of confidential funds
  • Arrest warrant issued for the Executive
  • 18 USC 1341 (Mail Fraud)
  • Alleges approximately 180,000 in kickbacks

8
Executive of General Contracting
Company(Cooperation)
  • Executive and defense atty. agree to meet with
    the USAO and agents
  • VP admits to scheme (5 kickbacks from
    subcontracting company)
  • Enters into a cooperation agreement with USAO
  • Provides information against NYC DOT official
  • Agrees to wear a body wire and make recorded
    telephone calls.

9
Executive - GC(Cooperation)
Allegation
Allegation
  • New York City Department of Transportation
  • Assistant Civil Engineer
  • (NYC DOT Employee)
  • Requested Macys gift cards and cash, in exchange
    for expedited payments to GC and NYC DOT permits.
  • NYC DOT employee received approximately 10,500
    in cash payments for NYC DOT permits.
  • Approximately 100,000 was solicited by Employee
    in exchange for favorably negotiating settlement
    of approx. 16 million dollar claim.
  • New York City Department of Transportation
  • Director of Movable Bridges
  • (NYC DOT Director)
  • One of the approving officials for NYC DOT
    necessary for the sign off of the approx. 16
    million claim.
  • Requested approximately 500,000 to favorably
    negotiate settlement for Executive.

10
Executive(Cooperation)
  • Cooperating Executive consents to concealed
    recordings with both NYC DOT employees
  • Multiple in person meetings were conducted
  • Conversations were recorded by Law Enforcement
  • Use of confidential funds
  • 17,000 NYC DOT employee
  • 10,000 Director
  • Arrest warrants issued for both
  • 18 USC 666 (Bribery)
  • Alleged 400,000 in bribery

11
GLOBAL CLAIM
  • The Corporation submitted a claim for 16,500,000
    to the City of New York.
  • Payment of change orders
  • Milestones
  • Although the Claim had been filed the parties
    were still free to negotiate.
  • The Executive had multiple meetings with both the
    Director and the Employee during which they
    discussed reaching a settlement of the Claim that
    would appear legitimate to NYC/DOT but, in fact,
    would result in a significant payoff to both the
    Director and the Employee.

12
Bribery Scheme
  • Quid pro quo 18 USC 666
  • Agreed the Executive would pay the Director an
    amount equal to 10 of any settlement amount
    exceeding 2,500,000.
  • The Director also promised that he could work
    behind the scenes and guarantee a negotiated
    settlement of between 6.5 million and 6.6
    million, in exchange for a bribery payment in
    excess of 525,000.
  • Director gave the Executive details about the
    Citys negotiating position and coached how to
    handle the settlement negotiations. During the
    course of the scheme, the Director accepted two
    cash payoffs totaling 60,000.

13
(No Transcript)
14
Undercover Meetings
  • Continued behind the scene work
  • DOT meetings
  • 10,000 initial payment to Director
  • 5000 payment to Employee

Conversation 2 - Dubai
Conversation 1 - 10,000
15
5000 CASH PAYOFF
XXXXX
16
(No Transcript)
17
Final Payment
  • 50,000 payment
  • Director continues to increase his bribe
  • Provides Executive with instruction on the wire
    transfer to Dubai.
  • Provides a fake invoice for 200,000 in
    merchandise with routing information to an
    account in Dubai.

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
RESULTS
  • Director Employee
  • November 27, 2007 Arrested
  • 18 USC 666 Federal Bribery
  • March 24, 2008 Pled Guilty
  • 18 USC 666
  • January 23, 2009 Sentenced
  • Director 12 months and One Day in jail
  • Employee 36 months in jail

21
CONTRACTORS BENEFIT TRUST (CBT)
  • Labor Lawyer Sole Trustee
  • Provides Health and Welfare Benefits pursuant to
    the Davis-Bacon Act (40 USC 226a), Little Davis
    Bacon (NY Labor Law Section 220), for prevailing
    wage workers.
  • Benefit bank for CBT client-contractors to
    appear to show compliance with prevailing wage
    requirements to state agencies.
  • CBT accepts fringe benefit contributions pursuant
    to participation agreements with contractors to
    benefit both unionized (business friendly)
    and/or non-unionized workers
  • CBT is a vehicle to get 2 for 1 dollars worth
    of prevailing wages back into the hands of the
    contractor officials/owners
  • CBT assets are used to purchase benefits for
    non-prevailing wage workers.
  • Owner
  • Office Staff

22
CONTRACTORS BENEFIT TRUST (CBT)
  • Recorded quotes from the Labor Lawyer
  • ..you wanna show the DA or whoever else is
    looking, Yeah, we got a, we got a set policy and
    people, whoever qualifies, they get it. So you
    gotta spend some money to make it look good. You
    know? The, the pig theory, you know the pig
    theory? Pigs get eaten, but hogs get
    slaughtered.
  • So if they get to the end and they say, You
    know, whatever it is hes doing, we cant figure
    it out.Thats not criminal if they cant figure
    it out.
  • We will do it, well put the money in the
    trust just so you can sleep at night. But I
    gotta tell you, two years from now youre going
    to say, You know, we could have got away with
    it.
  • Its going to look fishy,what Im afraid
    of is the report. Cause once theres a piece of
    paper that says Im contributing extra for
    such-and-such a job, now thats an admission.
    Youre saying you didnt do it right the first
    time.

23
INVESTIGATION RESULTS
  • Eight Search Warrants
  • Four Arrest Warrants
  • Seven Guilty Pleas
  • 98,000 Confidential funds used for payoffs
  • 143 monitored telephonic conversations
  • 38 monitored in person meetings
  • Approximately 32 hours of conversation
  • Approx. 7 million in restitution/forfeiture
  • 67,000 in fines
  • 78 months Incarceration
  • 168 months Probation/Supervised release
  • 200 hours community service
  • Three resignations from public service

24
QUESTIONS??????
25
CONTACT INFORMATION
US DOT/OIG
Special Agent Robert Stanek (212) 337-1363
US DOL/OIG
Special Agent Joseph Dellapenna (646) 264-3557
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com