Creating and Measuring Brand Equity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Creating and Measuring Brand Equity

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: AGGARWALS Last modified by: giyer Created Date: 12/21/2000 10:05:50 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:424
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: AGGAR
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Creating and Measuring Brand Equity


1
Creating and Measuring Brand Equity Intel
Inside
  • EWMBA 206
  • Fall 2007

2
If you were Andy Grove what do you want to know
before deciding to take IBM and Compaq to the
wall on Intel inside?
3
IBMs Problem
  • How much do consumers value Intel Inside?
  • Is it profitable for IBM to offer Intel Inside?

4
The Conjoint IdeaProducts are Composed of
Attributes
  • ComputerBrand Processor RAM Hard Disk
    Monitor Price

5
Breaking Down IBMs Problem
  • If IBM learns how buyers value the components
    (i.e. attributes) of a computer, they are in a
    better position to assess whether the Intel
    Inside attribute will be profitable.
  • Similarly for Intel, they want to know what the
    relative value of the components are for the
    OEMs.

6
How to Learn What Customers Want?
  • Ask Direct Questions about preference
  • What brand do you prefer?
  • What processor do you prefer?
  • How much RAM do you prefer?
  • How much hard disk space do you prefer?
  • What type of monitor do you prefer?
  • What price do you prefer?
  • What is the problem with this?

7
Problems with Direct Questioning
  • Answers are often trivial and unenlightening
  • I prefer more processor speed to less
  • I prefer more RAM to less
  • I prefer more hard disk space to less
  • I prefer a lower price to a higher price

8
How to Learn What Is Important?
  • Ask Direct Questions about Importances
  • How important is it that you get the Brand /
    Processor / RAM / Hard Disk / Monitor / Price
    that you want?
  • What is the problem with this?

9
Stated Importances
  • Importance Ratings often have low discrimination
    with most responses falling in most important
    categories

10
What is Conjoint Analysis?
  • Technique developed in early 1970s to measure how
    buyers value components of a product bundle and
    refined into the 2000s.
  • Dictionary definition-- Conjoint Joined
    together, combined. Features CONsidered
    JOINTly
  • Important Original Summary
  • Green, Paul and V. Srinivasan (1978), Conjoint
    Analysis in Marketing New Development with
    Implications for Research and Practice, Journal
    of Marketing, 54 (Oct), 3-19.

11
How Does Conjoint Analysis Work?
  • We vary the product features (independent
    variables) to build many (usually 12 or more)
    product concepts
  • We ask respondents to rate/rank those product
    concepts (dependent variable)
  • Based on the respondents evaluations of the
    product concepts, we figure out how much unique
    value (utility) each of the features added
  • Regress dependent variable on independent
    variables betas equal part worth utilities.

12
How does Conjoint Analysis Work?
  • More realistic questions
  • Would you prefer . . .486 or
    386 DXAMD
    Intel
  • If choose left, you prefer _______. If choose
    right, you prefer _______.
  • Rather than ask directly whether you prefer
    Processor speed over Processor brand, we present
    realistic tradeoff scenarios and infer
    preferences from your product choices.
  • When respondents are forced to make difficult
    tradeoffs, we learn what they truly value

13
First Step Create Attribute List
  • Attributes assumed to be independent (Brand,
    Processor Speed, Processor Brand, Price)
  • Each attribute has varying degrees, or levels
  • Brand Compaq, IBM, Acer
  • Processor Speed 486, 386DX, 386SX
  • Processor Brand Intel, AMD, Cyrix
  • Price 1500, 2000, 2500
  • Each level is assumed to be mutually exclusive of
    the others (a product has one and only one level
    of that attribute)

14
Traditional Conjoint Card-Sort Method
  • Using a 100-pt scale where 0 means definitely
  • would NOT and 100 means definitely WOULD
  • How likely are you to purchase
  • Compaq
  • Intel
  • 486
  • 2,900
  • Your Answer___________

15
Conjoint Importances
  • Measure of how much influence each attribute has
    on peoples choices
  • Best minus worst level of each attribute,
    percentaged486 386DX (2.5 - 1.8)
    0.7 15.21500 - 2500 (5.3 - 1.4)
    3.9 84.8 ----- -------- Totals 4.6 100
    .0
  • Importances are directly affected by the range
    and number of levels you choose for each
    attribute

16
Conjoint Design81 Product Concepts Challenging
  • For a conjoint study with
  • 3 brands
  • 3 processor speeds
  • 3 processor brands
  • 3 prices
  • There are 3x3x3x381 possible product
    combinations in a full-factorial design.
  • What respondent would want to evaluate all 81 in
    a survey?
  • Hence fractional factorial designs are used.

17
Conjoint DesignsFull-Factorial versus
Fractional-Factorial
  • Full Factorial (a design in which all possible
    product combinations are shown) 3x3x3x381
  • Fractional Factorial (a design in which only a
    subset of all possible product combinations are
    shown)
  • e.g., a subset of 9 appropriately chosen product
    combinations

18
Fractional Factorial Designs
  • Properties of appropriate fractional designs
  • Balanced (each level is displayed an equal number
    of times)
  • Orthogonal (no correlation between any pairs of
    attributes)
  • How to get these designs?
  • Design catalogs
  • Software programs
  • Commercial Conjoint Market Research companies
  • http//www.sawtoothsoftware.com/

19
Market Simulations
  • Make competitive market scenarios and predict
    which products respondents would choose
  • Accumulate (aggregate) respondent predictions to
    make Shares of Preference (some refer to them
    as market shares)

20
Market Simulation Example
  • Predicting market shares for existing computers
  • Compaq 486 AMD chip 2500IBM 486 AMD
    chip 2000 Acer 386D AMD chip 1500
  • Respondent 1 chooses computer 1!
  • Repeat for rest of respondents. . .

21
Market Simulation Results - I
  • Base Case
  • Acer 33.7
  • Compaq 32.1
  • IBM 34.2
  • Acer first adopts Intel Inside

22
Market Simulation Results - II
  • Base Case Acer
  • Acer 37.7 4
  • Compaq 30.2 - 2
  • IBM 32.0 - 2
  • Compaq next adopts Intel Inside

23
Market Simulation Results - III
  • Base Case Acer Compaq
  • Acer 35.6 4 2
  • Compaq 34.2 - 2 2
  • IBM 30.2 - 2 - 4
  • IBM next adopts Intel Inside

24
Market Simulation Results - IV
  • Base Case Acer Compaq IBM
  • Acer 33.6 4 2 0
  • Compaq 32.3 - 2 2 0
  • IBM 34.0 - 2 - 4 0
  • Prisoners Dilemma!

25
Strategic Source of Brand EquityPrisoners
Dilemma
26
Question How to Perform Conjoint with Actual
DataUsing Regression Analysis
  • In actual research the company may conduct a
    survey to collect data from a large sample of
    consumers from the target audience, say n200.
  • Multiple regression analysis (Intel Example)
  • Where Y is the preference of the individual. And
    b1,,b4 are the part-worth utilities.
  • MS Excel offers a simple multiple regression tool
    (Tools Data Analysis Regression with the
    Analysis Toolpak add-in installed).
  • Using the tool,
  • Specify the preference score (column Y) as the
    dependent variable
  • Four dummy-coded attribute columns as independent
    variables (Input X range).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com