IHRA Side Impact Working Group Status Report GRSP, December 2002 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

IHRA Side Impact Working Group Status Report GRSP, December 2002

Description:

IHRA Side Impact Working Group Status Report GRSP, December 2002 What is IHRA? International Harmonised Research Activities formed at 15th ESV in Melbourne 1996 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: DoT71
Learn more at: https://unece.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IHRA Side Impact Working Group Status Report GRSP, December 2002


1
IHRA Side Impact Working Group Status Report
GRSP, December 2002
2
What is IHRA?
  • International Harmonised Research Activities
    formed at 15th ESV in Melbourne 1996
  • Steering committee made up of international
    government vehicle safety regulators
  • 5 Working Groups to coordinate research in major
    problem areas of road safety
  • Progress reviewed at every ESV

3
IHRA Working Groups
  • Side Impact (Australia)
  • Vehicle Compatibility (UK/EEVC)
  • Biomechanics (NHTSA/USA)
  • Pedestrian Safety (JMLIT,Japan)
  • Intelligent Transport Systems (Transport Canada)

4
IHRA Side Impact Working Group
  • Side Impact Working Group formed after 1998 ESV
  • has around 10 members to enhance likelihood of
    progress
  • Governments of Europe, USA, Canada, Australia and
    Japan represented.
  • 3 Industry experts from OICA
  • one each from North America, Europe and
    Asia-Pacific

5
SIWG - Terms of Reference
  • The terms of reference of the SIWG is to
    co-ordinate research worldwide to support the
    development of future side impact test procedures
    to maximise harmonisation with the objective of
    enhancing safety in real world side crashes.

6
Interaction with Other Researchers
  • WorldSID Task Group, IHRA Compatibility and
    Biomechanics WGs kept informed on progress of
    SIWG
  • Need to ensure that
  • harmonised test device and injury criteria
    available
  • countermeasures in one area do not degrade safety
    in another

7
Proposed Test Procedures
  • Accident data indicated test procedures required
    in 4 areas
  • Mobile Deformable Barrier to vehicle test
  • Vehicle to pole test
  • Out-of-position side airbag evaluation
  • Sub-systems head impact test

8
Mobile Deformable Barrier Test
  • Most challenging task for the group
  • Main difficulty due to differences in fleet
    composition around the world
  • Passenger cars predominate globally
  • LTVs make up a large proportion of North American
    fleet
  • 2 MDB tests proposed
  • regulators to choose

9
MDB Test 1 - AE-MDB
  • New deformable barrier element (passenger car
    bullet)
  • Based on Advanced European (AE) - MDB being
    developed by EEVC and assisted by Japan
  • Small female dummy in drivers seat (min.)
  • Targeting - centreline of MDB 250 mm rear of
    R-point

10
MDB Test 1 - AE-MDB
  • Impact speed 50 km/h
  • Perpendicular impact
  • Regulation R95 trolley
  • Mass of trolley - 1500 kg

11
Test 1 - AE-MDB
12
MDB Test 2 - High Geometry MDB
  • Based on IIHS MDB test
  • Mass of trolley - 1500 kg
  • modified FMVSS 214 trolley
  • Perpendicular impact at 50 km/h
  • Small female dummy in front and rear seats on
    struck side

13
MDB Test 2 - IIHS MDB
14
Pole Test
  • Moving vehicle to pole test
  • Oblique impact at 15 degrees
  • load head and thorax simultaneously
  • Impact speed 32 km/h
  • Evaluate at least head, thorax abdomen
  • Mid size male WorldSID
  • Rigid pole 254 mm diameter

15
Out-of-position side airbag evaluation
  • NHTSA and Transport Canada tasked to review
    current research
  • including ISO TR 14933, NHTSA, Transport Canada,
    IIHS and industry research
  • Focussed principally on the risk of injury to
    small women, adolescents, and children

16
Out-of-position side airbag evaluation
  • A standard set of static deployment test
    procedures (occupant positions) for assessing
    side airbag inflation injury risk associated with
    various side airbag designs.

17
Out-of-position side airbag evaluation
  • Test devices best suited for assessing injury
    risk from the close-range deployment of side
    airbags
  • Hybrid III 5th female, 6-yo, 3-yo
  • SID IIs
  • Performance criteria to assess the injury risk
    measured by the test devices.

18
Sub-Systems Head Impact Test
  • Based on FMVSS and EEVC interior headform test
    procedure
  • Uses Free Motion Headform (FMH)
  • Points limited to those struck in side impact
  • may include non-struck side
  • Same exemptions for airbag-equipped cars as FMVSS
    201

19
Next Steps
  • SIWG meeting in March 2003 to finalise details of
    draft test procedures
  • Final report to IHRA Steering Committee just
    prior to ESV
  • Presentation of draft test procedures at
    beginning of Side Impact Technical Session at
    2003 ESV

20
Next Steps
  • SIWG to guide validation phase for test
    procedures between 2003 and 2005 ESV
  • and look into developing a test procedure for
    reducing non-struck side injuries
  • Submit for consideration a draft Global Technical
    Regulation for side impact protection after 2005
    ESV

21
THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com