Reliability Centered Maintenance: Module III - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Reliability Centered Maintenance: Module III

Description:

Reliability Centered Maintenance: Module III Salih O. Duffuaa Reliability Centered Maintenance Objective of Module Present the steps of RCM Demonstrate the steps ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1075
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: drsalih
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reliability Centered Maintenance: Module III


1
  • Reliability Centered Maintenance Module III
  • Salih O. Duffuaa

2
Reliability Centered Maintenance
  • Objective of Module
  • Present the steps of RCM
  • Demonstrate the steps clearly
  • At the end each participant should
  • Understand the basics of RCM
  • Initiate an RCM project
  • Participate effectively in teams implementing
    RCM.

3
Impact Of RCM On OM Costs
  • 1984 RCM pilot study At FP Ls Turkey Point
    Nuclear plant provided evidence that RCM could
    impact O M costs
  • Survey conducted by Electric Power Research
    Institute provided more evidence that RCM has
    impact on Cost.

4
RCM Impact
  • Plant trip reduction
  • Documented Basis For PM
  • Efficient PM Planning
  • Decrease in corrective maintenance
  • More accurate spare parts identification
  • Increase plant availability

5
Steps of RCM
  • System selection and data collection
  • System boundary definition
  • System description and Functional Block Diagram

6
RCM Steps Continued
  • Systems function and functional failures
  • Failure mode and effect analysis
  • Logic tree analysis (LTA)
  • Task selection

7
Level of RCM Application
  • Part
  • Component---Assembly
  • System
  • Plant

8
System Selection and Data Collection
  • Basis of system selection
  • What data and information to collect

9
Criteria for System Selection
  • 1- Systems with high PM tasks
  • 2- Systems with high breakdown maintenance
  • 3- Systems with large contributions to full or
    partial outages.

10
Criteria for Selection
  • 4- Systems with high cost of CM actions
  • 5- Systems with high content of concern with
    respect to safety and environmental issues
  • 6- Combinations of the Above
  • In a Typical selection process at Florida Power
    Light Fossil Power Generation 5 is used coupled
    with Parato chart.

11
Information Collection
  • System piping and information diagram
  • System schematic block diagram
  • Vendor manual
  • Equipment history file
  • System operation manual
  • System design specification and data description

12
Importance of system Boundary Definition
  • It provides knowledge of what hs or has not been
    included
  • The boundary determines what comes into and what
    leave the system ( in and out)
  • Boundary definitions must be clearly stated and
    documented

13
Example of system Boundary Definition
  • Refer To Transparencies --- Figure 5.4
  • System boundary details --- Figure 5.5 and Figure
    5.6

14
System Description and Functional Block Diagram
  • System description
  • Functional block diagram
  • In/out interfaces
  • System work breakdown structure
  • Equipment history

15
System Description
  • Tangible benefit of system description
  • Account and document baseline definition of
    system as existed
  • Ensure comprehensive understanding of the system
  • Aid in identifying critical parameters that
    contribute to degradation and loss of function

16
System Description Cont.
  • Elements of System Description
  • Functional description/ key parameters
  • Redundancy features
  • Protection features
  • Key instrumentation features
  • See figure 5.7 in transparences

17
Functional Block Diagram (FBD)
  • The FBD is a top-level representation of the
    major functions the system performs
  • It consists of functions no equipment appear.
    labeled functional subsystems
  • In/out interfaces shown
  • See figure 5.8

18
System Work Breakdown Structure (SWBS)
  • Carryover from Ministry of Defense Terminology
  • Compilation of the equipment lists in each
    functional subsystems shown in the fbd
  • Include all components within system boundary
  • list all instrumentation components
  • See figure 5.10 and 5.11 for equipment history
    file

19
Systems Functions and Functional Failures
  • List all functions
  • In essence every out interface should be captured
    into a function statement
  • Two additional sources for functions
  • Internal out interfaces between functional
    subsystems
  • Passive functions
  • List all functional failures

20
Correct and Not Correct Function Statements
  • Provide 1500 psi safety relief valves(w)
  • Provide for pressure relief above 1500 psi
  • Provide a 1500 gpm centrifugal pump on the
    discharge side of header 26 (w)
  • Maintain a flow of 1500 gpm at the outlet of
    header 26.

21
Correct and Not Correct Function Statements
  • Provide alarm to control room if block valves
    are lt 90 percent open (w)
  • Provide alarm to control room if flow rate is lt
    90 percent of rated flow
  • Provide water-cooled heat exchanger for pump lube
    oil (w)
  • Maintain lube oil ? 130 o F.

22
Functional Failure
  • The focus on loss of functions not loss of
    equipment
  • Absolutely necessary to distinguish between
    function loss conditions
  • Most functions have more than one loss condition
  • Distinction in loss condition usually leads to
    different failure modes

23
Functional Failures
  • Function provide for pressure relief above 1500
    psi
  • Functional failure
  • (a) Pressure relief occurs above 1650 psi
  • (b) Pressure relief occurs prematurely ( below
    1500psi)

24
Examples of Different Functional Failure
  • Function Maintain a flow of 1500 gpm at the
    outlet of header 26
  • Functional failures
  • (a) Flow exceeds 1500 gpm
  • (b) Flow is less than 1500 but greater than 1000
    gpm
  • ( c ) Flow is less than 1000 gpm
  • Function ad functional failure are recorded on
    figure 5.12

25
Failure Mode And Effect Analysis(FMEA)
  • Functional failure and equipment matrix
  • This matrix address which system equipment could
    play a role in the creation of functional
    failures. this is done by completing the matrix
    in figure 5.13.

26
Failure Mode and effect Analysis (FEMA)
  • Record The following on figure 5.14
  • Component
  • Failure Mode --- Figure 5.15 provides typical
    description for failure modes
  • Failure cause
  • Failure effect
  • Local
  • System
  • Plant

27
Redundancy General Rule
  • If redundancy prevent loss of function then a
    failure shielded by redundancy should be given
    different priority than a failure mode that can
    singly defeat a necessary function.
  • If multiple independent failure in a redundant
    situation is possible the we identified a design
    issue

28
Logic Tree analysis (LTA)
  • The purpose of this step is further prioritize
    failure modes that survive step 5. the
    prioritization is done qualitatively using the
    logic tree diagram in figure 5.16 and form 5.17

29
Task selection
  • In this step the appropriate maintenance task is
    selected to prevent the loss of function.
  • The task selection road map in figure 5.18 is
    used for this purpose with form 5.19

30
Sanity Checklist
  • The purpose of this check is to review
    critically all components failures that are
    treated run to failure to see if this decision is
    optimal.
  • Explain form 5.21

31
Terms On Sanity Checklist
  • marginal effectiveness it is not clear that the
    rtf costs are significantly less than the current
    pm costs
  • High-cost failure while there is no loss of
    critical function, the failure mode is likely to
    cause extensive damage to the component that
    should be avoided.

32
Terms In Sanity Checklist
  • Secondary damage similar to 2, except that there
    is a high probability extensive damage in
    neighboring components.
  • OEM conflict The original manufacturer
    recommends a PM task that is not supported by
    RCM. It is very sensitive of warranty conditions
    are involved.

33
Terms In sanity Checklist
  • Internal conflict Maintenance or operation feel
    strongly about the PM task that is not supported
    by RCM.
  • Regulatory conflict regulatory body established
    the PM, such as EPA.
  • Insurance conflict similar to the above two.

34
Comparison Between RCM Findings and existing
Situation
  • RCM-based and current tasks are identical.
  • Current PM tasks exist, but need to be modified
    to meet RCM-findings.

35
Comparison Between RCM Findings and existing
Situation
  • RCM-based PM tasks are recommended where no
    current tasks exist.
  • Current PM tasks exist where no RCM tasks-based
    task recommended-candidates for deletion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com