Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial

Description:

Authors: Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group Reviewer: Dr. Chris Booth ... Phase III Trial Authors: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: jch22
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial


1
Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Compared With
Gemcitabine Alone in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial
  • Authors Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research
    and the Central European Cooperative Oncology
    GroupReviewer Dr. Chris Booth
  • Date posted December 12 2007

2
Treatment A 21 day cycles Gem 1000mg/m2 D1 and
8 Cape 650 mg/m2 for 14 days
R
  • Treatment B
  • Burris regimen
  • 1000 mg/m2 7/8 weeks, then ¾ weeks

Locally advanced/ Metastatic Pancreas cancer
Primary endpoint overall survival Secondary
endpoints PFS, ORR, safety, QOL
3
RESULTS
Treatment A Treatment B p-value
Response Rate () 10.0 7.8 NS
PFS (median, mos) 4.3 mos 3.9 mos NS
OS (median, mos) 8.4 mos 7.2 mos NS
4
STUDY COMMENTARY

? Single agent Gem is current standard for
advanced/locally advanced PC ? Clinical benefit
and small OS benefit over 5-FU ? Multiple trials
have added something to Gem with no (or little)
success

- For a comprehensive review please see Van
Cutsem et al. JCO 2007. (reference) - NCIC CTG
PA.3 trial was the first study to show a survival
benefit (albeit a modest one) with the addition
of erlotinib to gemcitabine (reference)
5
STUDY COMMENTARY CONTINUED
  • ? ESMO 2005
  • - Interim data presented for RCT in UK of
    Gem-Cap vs Gem
  • - Median survival 7.4 vs 6 months (p0.014)
  • - ORR 14 vs 7 (p0.0001)
  • - OS at 1 year 26 vs 19
  • - This has led to some change in practice in
    Canada and US despite
  • the fact that 2 years later ths data have not
    yet been published in full
  • ? The current well designed study failed to
    detect any improvement in outcome with the
    addition of Capecitabine to Gemcitabine
  • - Post-hoc sub-group analysis suggests
    benefit to Cape-Gem among patients with good
    performance status (OS 10.1 vs 7.4 mos, p0.014)
  • ? No QOL data presented in the current article

6
BOTTOM LINE FOR CANADIAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS
  • This study does not support the use of Gem-Cape
    over Gem along in patients with advanced pancreas
    cancer
  • Results are discordant with the UK study
    presented at ESMO 2005
  • - Doses of Gem and Cape were higher in the
    UK study
  • Until the UK study is published in full, the
    standard of care for advanced pancreas cancer
    remains single agent Gemcitabine
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com