Interactive Introduction cost effectiveness - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Interactive Introduction cost effectiveness

Description:

A new wheelchair for elderly Increases quality of life = 0.1 10 years benefit Extra costs: $ 3,000 per life year QALY = Y x V(Q) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: User307
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interactive Introduction cost effectiveness


1
Interactive Introduction cost effectiveness
  • Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D.
  • Psychotherapeutic Centrum De Viersprong,
    Halsteren
  • Jan.Busschbach_at_deviersprong.net
  • 31 164 632200
  • Department of Medical Psychology and
    Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC
  • j.vanbusschbach_at_erasmusmc.nl
  • 31 10 4087812

2
New cancer therapy (1)
3
Time Without Symptoms of disease and subjective
Toxic effects of treatment
  • TWiST
  • Developed by Gelber (statistician)
  • In search for a typical cancer problem
  • Often prolonged life but also a reductions in
    quality of life
  • At the beginning (side effects)
  • At the end
  • Only count the days without symptoms of disease
    and subjective toxic effects of the treatment

4
New cancer therapy (2)
  • 50 patients each year (per hospital)
  • Drug x 50 x euro 1.750 euro 87.500
  • Drug y 50 x euro 2.000 euro 100.000
  • Drug budget for x or y euro 50.000
  • Number of patient
  • Drug x euro 50.000 / 1.750 28.5 patients
  • Drug y euro 50.000 / 2.000 25.0 patients
  • Survival in days
  • Drug x 28.5 patients x 300 days 8.550 days
  • Drug y 25.0 patients x 400 days 10.000 days
  • Survival in TWiST
  • Drug x 28.5 patients x 190 TWiST 5.415 days
  • Drug y 25.0 patients x 220 TWiST 5.500 days

5
TWiST ignores differences in quality of life
  • TWiST
  • Healthy 1
  • Sick (dead) 0
  • There is more to life than sick/health
  • Make scale 0..1
  • Quality of life scale
  • Quality adjusted TWiST
  • Q-TWiST
  • Almost equal to Quality Adjusted Life Years
    (QALYs)
  • How to scale quality of life?

6
EuroQol EQ-5D
  • MOBILITY
  • I have no problems in walking about
  • I have some problems in walking about
  • I am confined to bed
  • SELF-CARE
  • I have no problems with self-care
  • I have some problems washing or dressing myself
  • I am unable to wash or dress myself
  • USUAL ACTIVITIES (e.g. work, study, housework
    family or leisure activities)
  • I have no problems with performing my usual
    activities
  • I have some problems with performing my usual
    activities
  • I am unable to perform my usual activities
  • PAIN/DISCOMFORT
  • I have no pain or discomfort
  • I have moderate pain or discomfort
  • I have extreme pain or discomfort
  • ANXIETY/DEPRESSION
  • I am not anxious or depressed
  • I am moderately anxious or depressed

7
Value a health state
  • Wheelchair
  • Some problems in walking about
  • Some problems washing or dressing
  • Some problems with performing usual activities
  • Some pain or discomfort
  • No psychosocial problems

8
Time Trade-Off
  • TTO
  • Wheelchair
  • With a life expectancy 50 years
  • How many years would you trade-off for a cure?
  • Max. trade-off is 10 years
  • QALY(wheel) QALY(healthy)
  • Y V(wheel) Y V(healthy)
  • 50 V(wheel) 40 1
  • V(wheel) .8

9
In health economics Q-TWiST QALY
  • Count life years
  • Value (V) quality of life (Q)
  • V(Q) 0..1
  • 1 Healthy
  • 0 Dead
  • One dimension
  • Adjusted life years (Y) for value quality of life
  • QALY Y V(Q)
  • Y numbers of life years
  • Q health state
  • V(Q) the value of health state Q
  • Also called utility analysis

10
Which health care program is the most
cost-effective?
  • A new wheelchair for elderly
  • Increases quality of life 0.1
  • 10 years benefit
  • Extra costs 3,000 per life year
  • QALY Y x V(Q) 10 x 0.1 1 QALY
  • Costs are 10 x 3,000 30,000
  • Cost/QALY 30,000/QALY
  • Special post natal care
  • Quality of life 0.8
  • 35 year
  • Costs are 250,000
  • QALY 35 x 0.8 28 QALY
  • Cost/QALY 8,929/QALY

11
QALY league table
12
Car economics
  • Should we spend our money on a
  • Suzuki Alto 1.0
  • BMW 316
  • Comparing costs
  • Comparing outcome
  • Relate costs to outcome
  • Cost per outcome
  • Cost per kilometer
  • Suzuki Alto 1.0
  • BMW 316

13
Car league table
14
Egalitarian Concerns
1.0
Utility of Health
0.0
A
B
C
15
Implications shifting threshold
  • QALY are weighted
  • Weighted QALYs are maximized
  • Health is no longer the only thing maximized
  • Health status population will drop
  • Differences in health will drop
  • Egalitarian consideration are incorporated
  • Burden of disease becomes a criteria
  • Equity

16
CE-ratio by equity
17
Burden of disease based on STEP-data (N 641)
18
Are health economic results used?
  • Must we be afraid of the uncontrolled use of
    QALY?
  • QALY league table are difficult to make
  • Largest at Harvard School of Public Health
  • www.hsph.harvard.edu/organizations/hcra/cuadatabas
    e/intro.html
  • a comprehensive league table
  • a catalogue of preference scores
  • QALY league tables are not used
  • At least not in The Netherlands
  • There used to be a mysterious list in UK.

19
Health economic are used next to other criteria
  • Burden of disease
  • Ethical constrains
  • Financial constrains

20
Reimbursement arguments
  • Dunnings Funnel
  • 1990
  • Government declaration 2002
  • Necessary care
  • Need
  • Equity elements
  • Efficacy
  • Cost effectiveness
  • Own account and responsibility

21
Reimbursement arguments
Impact on QoL
Effect on QoL
Cost effectiveness ?
QALYs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com