Comparison of topography-guided (TGL) to standard LASIK (SL) for hyperopia. How important is adjustment for angle kappa? ASCRS 08 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Comparison of topography-guided (TGL) to standard LASIK (SL) for hyperopia. How important is adjustment for angle kappa? ASCRS 08

Description:

Title: Topography guided (TG) Hyperopic LASIK in 180 Consecutive Eyes Author: John Kanellopoulos Last modified by: ajk Created Date: 9/11/2006 9:22:48 AM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:227
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: JohnKanel9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparison of topography-guided (TGL) to standard LASIK (SL) for hyperopia. How important is adjustment for angle kappa? ASCRS 08


1
Comparison of topography-guided (TGL) to standard
LASIK (SL) for hyperopia. How important is
adjustment for angle kappa? ASCRS 08
  • A. John Kanellopoulos, MD
  • Associate Professor NYU, New York
  • Director, Laservision.gr, Athens, Greece
  • www.brilliantvision.com

2
We have reported our topo-guided experience in
LASIK utilizing the Wavelight-platform
(Kanellopoulos-JRS Sept05)
  • The software feeds 8 high quality topographies
    (Oculus) and offers surgeon adjustment for final
    ablation for
  • 1-sphere
  • 2-Cylinder
  • 3-Axis
  • 4-Q value (asphericity)
  • angle-kappa adjustment is done by default. So the
    ablation is decentered to target the visual axis

3
We have reported our experience with LASIK for
treating hyperopia with the standard Wavelight
platform Kanellopoulos-JRS 2006
Initial topography guided Hyperopic and Hyperopic
Astigmatism LASIK Experience with the WaveLight
ALLEGRETTO WAVE excimer laser in 120 Consecutive
Eyes ARVO 2006-JRS 2006
4
Is Angle kappa significant in hyperopes?
  • We published the study Measurement of angle
    kappa with synoptophore and Orbscan II in a
    normal population Hikmet Basmak, MD1 Afsun
    Sahin, MD2 Nilgun Yildirim, MD3 Thanos D.
    Papakostas, MD4,5 and A. John Kanellopoulos,
    MD4,52007 J Refract Surg-
  • We showed as previous investigators have that
    there is a significant correlation between
    positive refractive errors and large positive
    angle kappa values. Refractive surgeons must take
    into account angle kappa especially in hyperopic
    patients in order to avoid complications related
    to decent ration of ablation zone.

5
Purpose-why really use topo-guided for hyperopia?
  • We evaluated the Safety and efficacy of
    Topo-Guided LASIK (that compensates for angle
    kappa) versus standard hyperopic LASIK
  • Compare to previous data from previous published
    standard treatments(including ours)
  • Can we safely and effectively compensate for
    angle-kappa by using this platform?

6
An example of a topo-guided hyperopic correction
(1 is after, 2 is pre-op and 1 minus 2 the
difference showing that the ablation is
decentered when referenced to the pupil)
Treatment axis is centered on the visual axis and
not pupil center
7
METHODS
  • SETTING Laservision.gr Institute, Athens,
    Greece. 35 patients treated with TGL in one
    eye, SL in the other.
  • The Wavelight and Intralase systems were used.
  • Refraction, UCVA, BSCVA, angle kappa effective
    ablation diameter (EAD), wavefront analysis (WA)
    and contrast sensitivity (CS) were evaluated with
    18 months follow-up.

8
How is Angle kappa adjusted withtopo-link
  • These figures depict the same planned excimer
    profile for the correction of hyperopic
    astigmatism on the left centered on the
    pupillary center and on the right adjusted by
    topography to take into consideration and adjust
    for angle kappa

9
A LASIK flap with a microkeratome needs to be
de-centered as well to accommodate the
de-centered ablation this may beChallenging for
the surgeon. The Intralase offers a better option
to customise the flap cnetration
10
Results
  • Mean pre-op sphere for both groups
  • 3.08 (SD/- 1.56) D.
  • Cylinder 1.80 (SD/- 1.01 D).
  • Post-op Mean post-values Topo guided compared tp
    Standard
  • UCVA 20/20 to 20/23.
  • Regression 0.32 to 0.55.
  • Cylinder 0.25 to 0.54.
  • Ablation diameter 6.8 to 6.2 mm,
  • Wavefront 0.25 to 0.37.
  • Contrast sensitivity 40 to 15.

11
A head on comparison of the post-hyperopic LASIK
Pentacam map in the same patient The topo-guided
eye on the left and standard on the right
12
Conclusions
  • Topo Guided LASIK and Standard LASIK with the
    Intralase and the Wavelight laser appear to be
    safe and effective for hyperopia.
  • Topo-guided appears be superior in regard to
    regression, residual astigmatism, Contrast and
    ablation diameter
  • This platform achieves superior visual axis
    centration with a smaller re-treatment rate
    compared to our previously published series.
  • It reduces the chance of a surgeon-related
    de-centration error.
  • Oculyzer-link maybe faster and more-accurate
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com