Title: Comparison of topography-guided (TGL) to standard LASIK (SL) for hyperopia. How important is adjustment for angle kappa? ASCRS 08
1Comparison of topography-guided (TGL) to standard
LASIK (SL) for hyperopia. How important is
adjustment for angle kappa? ASCRS 08
- A. John Kanellopoulos, MD
- Associate Professor NYU, New York
- Director, Laservision.gr, Athens, Greece
- www.brilliantvision.com
2We have reported our topo-guided experience in
LASIK utilizing the Wavelight-platform
(Kanellopoulos-JRS Sept05)
- The software feeds 8 high quality topographies
(Oculus) and offers surgeon adjustment for final
ablation for - 1-sphere
- 2-Cylinder
- 3-Axis
- 4-Q value (asphericity)
- angle-kappa adjustment is done by default. So the
ablation is decentered to target the visual axis
3We have reported our experience with LASIK for
treating hyperopia with the standard Wavelight
platform Kanellopoulos-JRS 2006
Initial topography guided Hyperopic and Hyperopic
Astigmatism LASIK Experience with the WaveLight
ALLEGRETTO WAVE excimer laser in 120 Consecutive
Eyes ARVO 2006-JRS 2006
4Is Angle kappa significant in hyperopes?
- We published the study Measurement of angle
kappa with synoptophore and Orbscan II in a
normal population Hikmet Basmak, MD1 Afsun
Sahin, MD2 Nilgun Yildirim, MD3 Thanos D.
Papakostas, MD4,5 and A. John Kanellopoulos,
MD4,52007 J Refract Surg- - We showed as previous investigators have that
there is a significant correlation between
positive refractive errors and large positive
angle kappa values. Refractive surgeons must take
into account angle kappa especially in hyperopic
patients in order to avoid complications related
to decent ration of ablation zone.
5Purpose-why really use topo-guided for hyperopia?
- We evaluated the Safety and efficacy of
Topo-Guided LASIK (that compensates for angle
kappa) versus standard hyperopic LASIK - Compare to previous data from previous published
standard treatments(including ours) - Can we safely and effectively compensate for
angle-kappa by using this platform?
6An example of a topo-guided hyperopic correction
(1 is after, 2 is pre-op and 1 minus 2 the
difference showing that the ablation is
decentered when referenced to the pupil)
Treatment axis is centered on the visual axis and
not pupil center
7METHODS
- SETTING Laservision.gr Institute, Athens,
Greece. 35 patients treated with TGL in one
eye, SL in the other. - The Wavelight and Intralase systems were used.
- Refraction, UCVA, BSCVA, angle kappa effective
ablation diameter (EAD), wavefront analysis (WA)
and contrast sensitivity (CS) were evaluated with
18 months follow-up.
8How is Angle kappa adjusted withtopo-link
- These figures depict the same planned excimer
profile for the correction of hyperopic
astigmatism on the left centered on the
pupillary center and on the right adjusted by
topography to take into consideration and adjust
for angle kappa
9A LASIK flap with a microkeratome needs to be
de-centered as well to accommodate the
de-centered ablation this may beChallenging for
the surgeon. The Intralase offers a better option
to customise the flap cnetration
10Results
- Mean pre-op sphere for both groups
- 3.08 (SD/- 1.56) D.
- Cylinder 1.80 (SD/- 1.01 D).
- Post-op Mean post-values Topo guided compared tp
Standard - UCVA 20/20 to 20/23.
- Regression 0.32 to 0.55.
- Cylinder 0.25 to 0.54.
- Ablation diameter 6.8 to 6.2 mm,
- Wavefront 0.25 to 0.37.
- Contrast sensitivity 40 to 15.
11A head on comparison of the post-hyperopic LASIK
Pentacam map in the same patient The topo-guided
eye on the left and standard on the right
12Conclusions
- Topo Guided LASIK and Standard LASIK with the
Intralase and the Wavelight laser appear to be
safe and effective for hyperopia. - Topo-guided appears be superior in regard to
regression, residual astigmatism, Contrast and
ablation diameter - This platform achieves superior visual axis
centration with a smaller re-treatment rate
compared to our previously published series. - It reduces the chance of a surgeon-related
de-centration error. - Oculyzer-link maybe faster and more-accurate