Title: What rights does the Bill of Rights protect
1Unit 5
- What rights does the Bill of Rights protect?
2Lesson 29 Why does the First Amendment limit
the governments power over religion?
- Separation of church and state
- Why?
- History of European religious conflict
- Protect religion from being corrupted by the
state - Protect government from the corruption of
religious conflict - The Constitution
- Prohibition of religious tests
- The Bill of Rights (1st Amendment)
- Establishment clause
- Interpretations broad, narrow, literal
- Current criteria Lemon Test
- Cases Everson v. Board of Ed. (Incorporation)
Zorach v. Clauson (2) Engel v. Vitale (3)
Abbington v. Schempp Lemon v. Kurtzman (1)
Lynch v. Donnelly (4)
3Lesson 29 Why does the First Amendment limit
the governments power over religion?
- Separation of church and state
- The Bill of Rights (1st Amendment)
- Free exercise clause
- Compelling state interest
- Cases Reynolds v. United States West Virginia
v. Barnette Oregon v. Smith Church of the
Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah (Critcal
Thinking pg. 158)
4Lesson 30 How does the First Amendment protect
freedom of expression?
- What is freedom of expression?
- Speech (spoken and symbolic), press, assembly,
and petition - Why protect free speech?
- Promotes individual growth and human dignity
- It is important for the advancement of knowledge
- Necessary in a represenative democracy
- Vital to promote peaceful social change
- Essential to protect individual rights
- American history and freedom of speech
- Seditious libel
- Peter Zenger (1735)
- Alien and Sedition Acts (1798)
5Lesson 30 Freedom of Expression, cont.
- Accepted limitations on freedom of expression
- Time, place, manner restrictions
- Limit when, where and how you speak not what you
say - Cannot favor one group over another
- Clear and present danger restrictions
- National security Schenck v. United States
(1919) - Fighting words and bad tendency limit speech that
might lead to violence Abrams v. United States
(1919), Gitlow v. New York (1925) and Brandenburg
v. Ohio (1969) - Perjury
- Libel (more protections afforded to the
individual than a public official) New York
Times v. Sullivan (1964) - Student speech public schools
- Limits on disruptive speech Tinker v. Des Moines
School District (1963) - Limits on obscene/disruptive speech Bethel School
District v. Fraser (1986)
6Lesson 31 How does the First Amendment protect
freedom of assembly, petition, and association?
- Why protected?
- Lobbying- asking government to take action or
change its policies - Ensures a peaceful means of communication with
government - Assembly, petition and association
- Limitations on assembly
- Time, place, manner
- Peaceable
- Restricted to public property
- Regulations restricted to the protection of
legitimate government interests - Regulations must be non-discriminatory
- Regulations must not unnecessarily limit access
to public forums
7Lesson 31 How does the First Amendment protect
freedom of assembly, petition, and association?
- Freedom of association
- NAACP membership list NAACP v. Alabama (1958)
- Communist party membership list Barenblatt v.
U.S. (1959) - Freedom to not associate?
- Individual rights (right of association) vs.
common good (equal protection) - Examples?
- Synthesis of the First Amendment
- Board of Education of the Westside Community
Schools v. Mergens (1990) Critical Thinking pg.
169
8Lesson 32 Due process
- Substantive due process
- Limits the degree to which government can
interfere with life, liberty or property - Procedural due process
- Limits the procedures government may use when
interfering with life, liberty or property - Requires government to abide by the rule of law
- Adversary system of justice
- Two competing sides each try to prove their case
before an impartial judge or jury - Fairness is indispensable inorder to remove any
unfair advantage from one side of the case - Due process guarantees (criminal)
- Fourth Amendment (search and seizure) Fifth
Amendment (grand jury indictment, double
jeopardy, self-incrimination, due process) Sixth
Amendment (speedy, public trial, notification of
charges, confrontation of accusers, right to
counsel)
9Lesson 33 How do the Fourth and Fifth
Amendments protect us against unreasonable law
enforcement procedures?
- Why the Fourth Amendment?
- Right to privacy A mans home is his castle
- Writs of assistance (general warrants)
- Search Warrants
- Basis
- Sworn complaint filed with a judge describing the
facts and circumstances around the crime - Probable cause- reasonable belief that a person
has or is committing a crime - Specify
- Place or person to be searched
- Items to be searched for
- Time in which warrant is to served
10Lesson 33 Fourth Amendment
- Warrantless searches
- Basis
- No time for a warrant
- Probable cause
- Public schools
- Reasonable suspicion New Jersey v T.L.O. (1985)
- Enforcement
- Departmental discipline
- Civilian review boards
- Civil law suits
- Exclusionary rule
- Evidence seized illegally, without valid warrant
or without probable cause, is excluded as
evidence - Case Law
- Weeks v United Sates (1914)
- Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
- Good faith exception United States v. Leon
(1984)
11Lesson 33 Fifth Amendment
- Protection against self-incrimination
- Criminal trial protections
- Take the fifth
- Why?
- Confession eliminates need for vigilant search
for additional evidence - Prevents threats, torture to gain evidence
- Strengthens principle of innocent until proven
guilty - Case law
- Commonwealth v. Dillon (1791), Fulminante v.
Arizona (1991), Recent case from New Jersey - Pre-trial protections
- Right to remain silent
- Why?
- Pre-trial confessions can consist of
self-incriminating testimony - Case law
- Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
12Lesson 33 Fifth Amendment, continued
- Exceptions
- Testimony about others is not protected unless
that testimony would incriminate the one
testifying - Grant of immunity from prosecution because
immunity removes the consequence of evidence
being used against the witness - Voluntary confession
- Comments made before arrest
13Search and Seizure You be the judge
- Mary Sue is driving down Main Street. A police
officer is next to her at light and notices that
she is smoking a joint. He searches her purse
and purse and car. - The police arrive at Kevins door at 1100 p.m.
They say they are looking for a stolen
television. Kevin lets them in and they search
his house. - Seymour, a high school student, is seen by a
teacher in the hall putting a knife into his
pocket. He is called to the principals office
and asked to empty his pockets. The knife is
found. - Based on suspicious actions, police officer
Sanchez thinks John is staking out a jewelry
store. When asked to produce identification, John
mumbles something. Unable to understand him,
officer Sanchez pats him down and finds a gun. - Mary Jane, a known drug dealer, is waiting for
the bus when police approach and search her. They
find drugs in her pocket. - The police received a hot tip regarding some
illegal gambling going on at Billys house. They
obtain a warrant to search the premises named in
the warrant and arrest the gamblers and
confiscate gambling equipment. They find later
that the warrant was invalid because it had the
wrong date on it. - Police stop Bird Dog on reasonable suspicion that
he is selling drugs. The officer pats down Bird
Dog for weapons and feels some small object in
his pocket. After feeling the object for more
than a minute with his fingers, the officer
determines that the object is crack cocaine. He
reaches in and removes the cocaine.
14Lesson 35 How do the Fifth through Eighth
Amendments protect our rights within the judicial
system?
- Fifth Amendment protections after arrest
- Federal grand jury indictment (unincorporated)
- Double jeopardy
- Self-incrimination
- Sixth Amendment
- Speedy, public trial by impartial jury of peers
- Location in district where crime committed
- Information on specific charges
- Confront witnesses against defendant
- Obtain favorable witnesses
- Right to counsel
- Capital offenses Powell v. Alabama (1932)
- Imprisonment (special circumstances) Betts v.
Brady (1942) - All defendants facing loss of liberty Gideon v.
Wainwright (1963) - Pre-trial in criminal proceedings Miranda v.
Arizona (1966)
15Lesson 35 Fifth through Eighth Amendments
- Eighth Amendment
- Excessive bail
- Protects the innocent
- Protects the poor
- Excessive fines
- Cruel and unusual punishment
- Constitution accepts the legitimacy of death
penalty - Problems race, determent, cost, consistency
161999-2000 Bill of Rights Cases
- First Amendment
- Establishment clause
- Sante Fe Independent School District v. Doe,
Jane, et al. - Prayer before a football game
- Association
- Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, James
- Exclusion of homosexual troop leader from BSA
- Speech
- Board of Regents, University of Wisconsin v.
Southworth, Scott, et al. - Mandatory support of political/ideological
student groups through students fees - Fifth Amendment
- Self-incrimination
- Dickerson, Charles v. U.S.
- Admissibility of confession under 18 USC section
3501 without proper Miranda warnings - Others??
- Check http//oyez.nwu.edu
- Click on On the Docket for a list of cases and
synopsis of constitutional issues