Civil liberties refer to rights of individuals against government intrusion found in the Bill of Rights - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Civil liberties refer to rights of individuals against government intrusion found in the Bill of Rights

Description:

Civil Liberties Civil liberties refer to rights of individuals against government intrusion found in the Bill of Rights Civil rights concerns the rights of groups ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: DaveF177
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Civil liberties refer to rights of individuals against government intrusion found in the Bill of Rights


1
Civil Liberties
  • Civil liberties refer to rights of individuals
    against government intrusion found in the Bill of
    Rights
  • Civil rights concerns the rights of groups
    against discrimination or the positive
    protections of group rights by government.

2
The Incorporation Doctrine
  • The Bill of Rights protected citizens from the
    national government, but the same protections did
    not automatically apply to the states.
  • In Gitlow v. New York 1925 the Supreme Court
    argued that fundamental personal rights are
    protected from infringement by the states because
    of the due process clause.
  • The 14th amendments due process clause created
    the possibility that some or all of the Bill of
    Rights might restrict actions by state
    governments.
  • Since that time most, but not all, of the Bill of
    Rights have been incorporated into the states.
    This is known as the incorporation doctrine.

3
Is it constitutional?
  • For a public school class to begin with a prayer?
    Why or why not?
  • For students to meet at the Logan flagpole to
    have a prayer before school?
  • To have in God we trust on our money or under
    God in our pledge of allegiance?

4
First Amendment Freedom of Religion
  • Court Cases Engel v. Vitale (1962) The court
    ruled that prayer in a public school is
    unconstitutional.
  • The establishment clause pertains to the
    separation of church and state. The free exercise
    clause prohibits the government from interfering
    in the way religion is practiced.
  • Lemon Test Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) a law or
    state action regarding religion was
    constitutional if
  • There is a secular purpose
  • The primary effect is not to advance or inhibit
    religion
  • Government is not excessively entangled with
    religion

5
Is it constitutional?
  • To yell fire in a crowded theater?
  • To write something that is false about a person?

6
1st Amendment Freedom of Speech
  • You cannot say anything you want about someone
    else.
  • Defamation of character is not legal.
  • Stating untruths about a person orally is
    slander.
  • Writing untruths is called libel. When this is
    done on purpose it is done with actual malice.
  • In Schenck v. US (1919) Supreme Court held that
    words that incite are not protected. The test was
    whether these words constituted a clear and
    present danger (e.g. yelling fire in crowded
    theater.)

7
Is it constitutional?
  • For students to wear an armband at school
    protesting the war in Afghanistan?
  • Yes. Students had the right to wear armbands
    during Vietnam War. It was protected as symbolic
    speech. Tinker v. Desmoines 1969

8
Is it constitutional?
  • For American Nazis to march in a Jewish community
    in the US?

9
Freedom of speech and assembly
  • Hate speech, or symbolic displays of hate are
    protected (e.g. cross burnings and racist
    propaganda) as in the case of the American NAZI
    party marching in Skogie Illinois.
  • In a case involving the Ku Klux Klan the Supreme
    Court Ruled in that the state could not limit the
    Klans speech or ideas, unless it could be proven
    that their activities incited violence.
    Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)

10
Is it constitutional?
  • Can the US government censor an article that they
    dont like or think makes the government look
    bad?
  • No. The government cannot censor a press story it
    doesnt like. For example, the New York Times
    published the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam
    War. The Supreme Court in NY Times v US ruled
    there can be no prior restraint on a story.

11
Is it constitutional?
  • Many states or cities pass gun control laws,
    which limit certain types of weapons or limit gun
    use?
  • In a recent Supreme Court hearing, the gun
    control laws passed in Chicago were challenged by
    proponents of the second amendment.
  • The key question was whether the second amendment
    is a fundamental individual right which should be
    incorporated into state laws, or a right that
    pertains to well regulated state
    militias,giving the right to states and
    localities to put limits on guns.

12
Whats the verdict
  • 1. Do think current legislative attempts to
  • Ban assault rifles
  • Require universal background checks
  • Limit the number bullets in a clip
  • are Constitutional?
  • 2. Do you think these measures would reduce gun
    violence?

13
Is it Constitutional?
  • Can the police search your home without a
    warrant?
  • Can the police search your car without a warrant?

14
4th amendment - search and seizure
  • Protects people from unreasonable search and
    seizure.
  • The Court argued the exclusionary rule, that
    evidence obtained illegally is not admissible in
    court. Mapp v. Ohio 1961
  • The police can search a vehicle without a
    warrant if there is a valid reason to stop the
    vehicle in the first place.

15
Is there a right to privacy?
  • The right of privacy is not mentioned in the
    Constitution. However, the Supreme Court found
    that such a right was implied.
  • The Supreme Court struck down a state law that
    prohibited birth control counseling and made the
    use of contraceptives by married couples
    illegal. The Court argued that privacy is
    protected through the first, third, fourth, fifth
    and ninth amendments. Griswold v. Connecticut
    (1965) .

16
The Right to Privacy
  • Privacy has also become more important with
    changes in technology. The courts rule regularly
    on the right of law enforcement to tap phones,
    take bank records, check computer searches etc.
    These issues fall under the 4th amendment.
  • The argument over these issues has increased
    since 9/11 where Americans are regularly drawing
    the balance between security and privacy.

17
5th and 6th amendments Due process and public
trial
  • A person cant be tried twice for the same crime
    double jeopardy.
  • People have right to speedy trial
  • Miranda v. Arizona (1964) gives the accused the
  • Right to remain silent
  • Any statement can be used in evidence
  • Right to have an attorney present during
    questioning
  • An attorney appointed if defendant cant afford
    one (Gideon v. Wainwright 1963)

18
The 8th Amendment
  • Do you think the death penalty constitutes cruel
    and unusual punishment described in the eighth
    amendment? Why or why not?
  • The death penalty was upheld by Supreme Court

19
Two types of Due Process
  • Due process is the principle that government must
    respect all legal rights of a person (found in
    5th and 14th amendments)
  • Procedural due process means that people who go
    before a court are guaranteed a fair trial
  • Substantive due process means that each person
    has fundamental rights found in American history
    or traditions and these cannot be violated (e.g.
    Civil rights etc.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com