SWEPACS: a running water prediction and classification system using benthic macroinvertebrates - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

SWEPACS: a running water prediction and classification system using benthic macroinvertebrates

Description:

SWEPACS: a running water prediction and classification system using benthic macroinvertebrates ... Assessment of whether the fauna at a site could be predicted ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: leonard88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SWEPACS: a running water prediction and classification system using benthic macroinvertebrates


1
SWEPACS a running water prediction and
classification system using benthic
macroinvertebrates
  • Leonard Sandin
  • Department of Environmental Assessment
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

2
Outline
  • RIVPACS background
  • General model development
  • Swedish data
  • Swedish model development
  • Results
  • Quality bands
  • Summary

3
RIVPACS background
  • River InVertebrate Prediction And Classification
    System
  • Started 1977 in the UK (Institute of Freshwater
    Ecology)
  • Biological classification of unpolluted
    running-water sites (macroinvertebrates)
  • Assessment of whether the fauna at a site could
    be predicted using physical and chemical features

4
General model development
  • 1. classification of reference sites into
    biologically similar groups
  • - using some cluster algorithm (e.g., TWINSPAN,
    k-means)

5
  • 2. development of a discriminant model with data
    collected from reference sites to estimate the
    probabilities of a new site belonging to each of
    the site groups defined in (1)

Moss (2000)
6
  • 3. calculation of the probabilities of all taxa
    in the regional taxa pool occurring within each
    reference site group

7
  • 4. calculation of the probabilities that each
    taxon will occur at a new site based on (2) and
    (3)
  • - using Discriminant Function Analysis
  • using environmental data a "new" stream is
    placed in group I with 80 probability
  • in group II with 20 probability

8
- and the weighted probability of taxa occurrence
9
  • 5. summation of the estimated probabilities of
    capture of all taxa to estimate the number of
    taxa expected (E) at a new site

10
  • 6. calculation of Observed/Expected
  • ratio

11
Swedish data
  • National stream survey 1995
  • 696 streams sampled
  • Macroinvertebrates
  • gt 100 environmental variables
  • Substratum, chemistry, vegetation, riparian zone,
    catchment characteristics, geographical variables

12
Reference or least impaired condition
  • 365 samples included in model building
  • No acidification (exceedence of S Critical Load)
  • No eutrophication (lt 20 arable land in
    catchment)
  • No point source pollution
  • Sampling error removed
  • No liming

13
Illies biogeographical regions
  • arctic/alpine ecoregion region 20
  • northern and middle boreal ecoregions
    region 22
  • southern, boreo-nemoral and nemoral ecoregions
    region 14

14
Building the models
  • Classification (TWINSPAN)
  • Discriminant Function Analysis - choosing
    explanatory environmental variables
  • Predicting taxa occurrence
  • Calculating Observed/Expected ratios

15
The three models
  • 30 - 186 sites
  • 72 - 173 taxa
  • 4 - 6 TWINSPAN groups
  • 7 - 8 predictor environmental variables
  • Latitude, longitude, altitude in all models

16
Region 14 (southern Sweden)
  • Five groups
  • Seven environmental variables
  • 63.5 into correct group
  • 54.0 using cross-validation

17
Environmental variables
  • Latitude, longitude, altitude in all models
  • Stream velocity, depth, substratum
  • Vegetation in the stream
  • Catchment area, vegetation in catchment
  • Above/Below highest coastline of the last
    glaciation

18
Inclusion threshold (probability)
  • The probability level where an expected taxon is
    included in calculating the O/E ratio
  • RIVPACS 0 probability
  • AUSRIVAS 50 probability
  • SWEPACS 25 probability
  • Very common and very rare are not very good
    indicators - more is not always better!

19
Inclusion threshold - results
  • Models for region 14 and 22 had similar taxon
    richness
  • Lower taxon richness in region 20 (arctic/alpine)
    complex

20
Inclusion thresholds - results
  • Number of observed and expected taxa increased as
    the inclusion threshold decreased

21
Validation of models
  • Internal validation - model data set
  • External validation - independent reference sites
  • Discriminatory power - impacted sites

22
Validation of models
  • O/E ratios
  • Region 14
  • Internal
  • External

23
Validation of models
  • Internal and external (5 ) reference tests (3 -
    10 sites)
  • p gt 0.05 for all pairs (regions) Internal -
    external

24
Test of perturbed sites
  • Region 14
  • O/E number of taxa
  • gt 100 mg tot P/l
  • Model 0.981
  • External 0.798
  • Affected 0.782
  • p lt 0.01

25
Test using ASPT
  • Region 14
  • O/E ASPT
  • gt 100 mg tot P/l
  • Model 0.945
  • External 0.997
  • Affected 0.841
  • p lt 0.01

26
Summary
  • Model is built in four steps
  • Reference or least impaired conditions
  • Illies biogeographical regions
  • 4 - 6 TWINSPAN groups
  • 7 - 8 predictor environmental variables
  • Latitude, longitude, altitude in all models
  • Validation of models (internal, external,
    perturbed)
  • O/E ratios e.g., number of taxa, indices
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com