A Tutorial on Nonintercepting Electromagnetic Monitors for Charged Particle Beams Bob Webber January - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

A Tutorial on Nonintercepting Electromagnetic Monitors for Charged Particle Beams Bob Webber January

Description:

... Attenuation ... Wall current induced in beam tube attenuate external field. Break in tube impedes ... shield impedance to attenuate noise source voltage? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: beamdo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Tutorial on Nonintercepting Electromagnetic Monitors for Charged Particle Beams Bob Webber January


1
A Tutorial on Non-intercepting Electromagnetic
Monitors for Charged Particle Beams Bob
WebberJanuary 30, 2008
  • AD Beam Instrumentation

2
Electromagnetic Monitors for Charged Particle
Beams
  • Electromagnetic beam monitors offer a
    non-disruptive means to observe and quantify
    properties of the beam itself or, with the beam
    as a probe, of the accelerator or transport line
    in which the beam travels
  • Fundamental parameters that can be measured
    include
  • beam current
  • temporal distribution of particles
  • transverse position of the beam in the chamber
  • Monitors are designed to sample the beams
    electric field, magnetic field, or a combination
    of each
  • Monitors that interact primarily with the
    electric field are typically called electric or
    capacitive monitors
  • Monitors that interact primarily with the
    magnetic field are typically called magnetic
    monitors or current transformers

3
Signals and Sensitivities
  • A capacitive pickup signal
  • Polarity depends on the sign of the beam
    particles charge
  • Amplitude is independent of the direction the
    beam is traveling
  • A magnetic pickup signal
  • Polarity determined by the product of particle
    charge and direction of travel, i.e. the sign of
    electric current
  • Amplitude is independent of the direction the
    beam is traveling
  • An electromagnetic pickup signal coupled to
    both the electric and magnetic fields
  • Polarity depends on the relative electric and
    magnetic coupling
  • Amplitude response can depend on the direction of
    beam travel without regard to the particle charge
    like a directional power coupler

4
A Model Charge Distribution
5
Beam Current of Distribution
To an observer at a fixed position in x, the
distribution presents a bunch frequency of
f  ßc/Lb. The beam current of this charge
distribution, observed at x 0 is
where ? 2?f. The zero-frequency term of
magnitude ßcA is the DC or average beam
current. This simple single-frequency model
presents no loss of generality, since any real
charge distribution can be described by a Fourier
series, a linear superposition of terms with
different frequencies and phases.
6
The Beam as a Signal Source
  • The beam appears as nearly an ideal current
    source, that is, the beam current is unaffected
    by interaction with the monitor.
  • The source impedance, the change in terminal
    voltage required to effect a change in current,
    is described as
  • For 10 mA, 10 MeV beam, find 4E11 ohms for
    electrons, 2E9 ohms for protons!
  • Significant exceptions like beam instabilities
    are possible when the beam interacts repeatedly
    with a periodic structure.
  • V i R i Z

7
The Beam Environment
  • The beam and its environment communicate
    through the electric and magnetic fields
  • Typically the beam travels through an evacuated
    chamber bounded by an electrically conducting
    metallic wall
  • The beam, an assembly of charged particles,
    carries an electric field which induces image
    charge on the chamber wall
  • The beam, as charged particles in motion,
    carries a magnetic field that, at sufficiently
    high frequency, induces the image charge to flow
    with it. The resulting wall currents are, to
    first order, equal and opposite to the beam
    current

8
An Artists Conception of the Fields
Electric
Q
Q
Velocity ß ? 1
Isolated charge at rest
Charge at rest in pipe
Charge at relativistic velocity
Magnetic Beam into page
At moderate and high frequency, no field outside
chamber
At DC, fields penetrate chamber
9
Beam E/M Field Attenuation
  • To the extent that wall currents mirror the
    beam current, the magnetic field outside the beam
    tube is cancelled
  • This field strength reduction corresponds to
    the attenuation of electromagnetic waves
    propagating through a conductor
  • The characteristic length in which the fields
    are reduced by a factor of e (-8.69 dB) is
    termed the skin depth
  • The skin depth in a non-magnetic good conductor
    is
  • where ? is the resistivity of the conductor in
    ohm-meter and f is the frequency of interest in
    Hz

10
Energy Flows through the Dielectric
  • Chart of skin depth in millimeters
  • A 1/32 stainless beam tube wall is 6.1 skin
    depths at 10Mhz and attenuates magnetic fields
    propagating to the exterior by 53dB
  • Not so much as to make the beam signal invisible
    to a sensitive radio receiver
  • Sufficient to clobber the sensitivity of a
    practical beam current monitor
  • Hence beam monitors generally must be placed
    inside the beam chamber

11
A Typical Messy Environment
Lines of induction around isolated circulating
beam
Wall current induced in beam tube attenuate
external field
Break in tube impedes wall current
Typical complex and distributed paths available
to induced currents
12
A Capacitive (Electric Field) Pickup
An isolated cylindrical electrode with length Le
and radius a inside tube with radius b. Electric
field lines from beam can terminate on electrode,
but no loop area is present to intercept magnetic
flux.
13
Estimating the Signal
  • Assuming a purely transverse electric field,
    the charge induced on the inside of the
    capacitive electrode at any time is equal to the
    total beam charge contained within the linear
    extent of the electrode and opposite in sign.

Solving the integral gives
The first zero in this sin(x)/x frequency
response shape occurs where Le Lb
  • Wrong High Frequency Limit

14
When Propagation Time Matters
  • Missing is consideration of the time delay for
    a charge induced at any position along the
    electrode to be recognized at the tap point. This
    information can only travel at the speed of an
    electromagnetic wave, the speed of light, for a
    monitor with vacuum as the only dielectric. At
    low frequencies the effect is negligible where
    transit times are a significant fraction of the
    period and the bunch length is comparable to the
    electrode length, the impact is large.
  • Accounting properly for signal propagation
    times (ignoring azimuthal effects on the
    assumption of cylindrical symmetry including beam
    position), the effective charge observed at the
    tap point at any time is the sum of the charges
    induced at all longitudinal segments of the
    electrode at a time earlier by an amount x/v,
    where x is the position of the segment relative
    to the tap point and v ßc for vacuum.

15
Mathematically
  • Mathematically the time at each position along
    the electrode is weighted by the transit time to
    the tap point. The expression for the induced
    charge as observed at the tap point becomes
  • And the available signal current is

  • Correct High Frequency Limit !

The first zero occurs where Le Lb/2
16
Signal Power from Capacitive Pickup
  • In the short electrode limit, LeltltLb, the tap
    point current is

In the frequency domain, the signal voltage on
load resistor R becomes
where Z is parallel combination of R and
Celectrode and t R Celectrode
Signal power for ? gtgt 1/t is
V2/R (1/R)(ALe/C) 2 (ALe) 2/(Ct)
with capacitance
The resulting signal power for ? gtgt 1/t is
17
A Window to the Beam
  • Since the magnetic field of the beam is
    severely attenuated outside a continuous
    conducting vacuum chamber, a practical beam
    current monitor must either be placed within the
    vacuum chamber walls or the conducting path in
    the chamber must be broken
  • To minimize the mechanical complications of
    inserting a device into the vacuum, a
    non-conducting material, often ceramic, is
    typically inserted in a section of the beam tube
  • This break in the beam tube conduction path
    forces wall currents to find a new path,
    potentially under the instrument designers
    control, outside the vacuum chamber

18
The Ceramic Break
Typical Ceramic Break Installation
Circuit Model
  • Beam tube capacitance, grounds, and ungrounded
    parallel connections may be intentional or
    incidental, local or distant, but something will
    always be present
  • Zgap is combination of the gap capacitance and
    all external parallel elements
  • Gap voltage
    will be generated

19
Location of Current Monitor Relative to Gap
  • OK - only beam currents, not wall currents will
    pass through monitor
  • NOT OK - wall currents bypass gap through grounds
    then proceed through monitor

OK - wall currents cannot bypass gap to flow
through monitor NOT OK - wall currents
bypass gap through grounds then proceed through
monitor
20
Impedance Measured Across Ceramic Gap on Beam
Tube Courtesy of Jim Crisp/Mike Reid
21
Controlling the Environment and Taming the Gap
Impedance
  • Zshunt is applied to control potentially high
    gap impedances
  • Strap or housing around the transformer and gap
  • Short circuits external currents that might flow
    through Zshunt and produce undesired monitor
    signals
  • Shields external world from the beam current and
    gap voltage

22
The Beam Current Transformer Model
Magnetic flux due to any winding k
Total flux is sum of that due to all currents,
beam and signal
Beam acts as single-turn primary winding
Voltage on any winding
Signal power at mid-band frequencies
Frequency response
23
Compare Signal Power from Capacitive and Magnetic
Pickups of Same Time Constant
Above low frequency corner
  • In the absence of magnetic or dielectric
    materials, µr er 1, the power from the
    magnetic monitor can never exceed that from the
    capacitive monitor.
  • For non-relativistic beams, the capacitive
    monitor provides greater signal power than the
    magnetic monitor by a factor of 1/ ß2.
  • For relativistic beams the available power from
    the two monitors is identical.
  • The addition of magnetic or dielectric
    material enhances the relative performance of the
    magnetic monitor, an advantage that can be
    dramatic as commonly available magnetic materials
    can offer permeability gt 10,000. Hence, the
    predominance of magnetic type beam current
    monitors.
  • Capacitive monitors, in the relativistic beam
    regime, can offer benefits in instances where the
    signal power is adequate and at high frequencies
    where the advantage of magnetic materials can be
    lost.

24
Magnetic Loop Pickup
25
Directional Coupler
Equal signal out and along line
Zo
Zo
Zo
Zo
No signals
2Le
Zo
Zo
Zo
Zo
Forward line signal and opposite prompt signal
cancel at downstream port and opposite polarity
signal propagates backwards along line
Resulting signal at upstream port
Upstream port signal also zero in steady state
case if electrode electrical length is ½ bunch
spacing !
26
Conclusion
  • A conceptual introduction to electromagnetic
    beam monitors was presented from basic principles
  • Models for estimating signal strength from both
    capacitive and magnetic monitors were shown and
    the relative signal strength from the two types
    was given
  • A model for understanding a directional coupler
    monitor was outlined
  • Hopefully the talk stimulates each listener to
    develop his/her own understanding of these basic
    processes in addition to the formal mathematics
    and to ask how does it work at a fundamental
    level

27
Previous Tutorials
  • First Workshop, 1989, BNL, Upton, NY ---
    Accelerator Instrumentation, AIP Conference
    Proceedings 212, New York American Institute of
    Physics, 1990.
  • Longitudinal Emittance An Introduction to the
    Concept and Survey of Measurement Techniques
    Including Design of a Wall Current Monitor, pp.
    85-125.
  • Sixth Workshop, 1994, Vancouver, BC, Canada ---
    Beam Instrumentation Workshop, AIP Conference
    Proceedings 333, New York American Institute of
    Physics, 1995.
  • Charged Particle Beam Current Monitoring
    Tutorial, pp. 3-23.
  • Ninth Workshop, 2000, Cambridge, MA --- Beam
    Instrumentation Workshop 2000, AIP Conference
    Proceedings 546, New York American Institute of
    Physics, 2000.
  • Tutorial on Beam Current Monitoring, pp.
    83-104.

28
Backups
29
Toroidal Flux and Inductance
Lines of magnetic induction, B, encircle a
current i. In a homogeneous region near the
current, B is a function of radius from the
current is given by Amperes Law. constant at any
i is wihre B is constant and any radius and the
path of intergration is a circule around the wire
and has magnitude 2pir. Assume toroid of inner
radius a, outer radius b, and height (thickness) h
Assume toroid of inner radius a, outer radius b,
and height (thickness) h
Total flux is sum of that due to all currents,
beam and signal
Single-turn winding with current i
Voltage on any winding
Signal power at mid-band frequencies
Frequency response
30
Common Types of Beam Current Transformers
  • Integrating Current Transformer (ICT)
  • Passive current transformer depending on short (lt
    1 nsec), isolated (50 nsec) beam bunch to drive
    impulse response of transformer
  • Output pulse shape is fixed by design and
    independent of shape of sufficiently short beam
    pulse
  • Output amplitude is directly proportional to
    charge of beam pulse
  • Useful in synchrotrons, storage rings, and
    transport lines provided short isolated bunch
    criteria are met
  • Advantage
  • Simple, relatively inexpensive, stable passive
    calibration
  • Output stretched in time relative to very short
    beam pulse
  • Disadvantage
  • Bunch shape information is not available

31
Common Types of Beam Current Transformers
  • Direct Current Transformer (DCCT, PCT, etc.)
  • A strong well-controlled magnetizing force is
    applied to one or more toroids enabling sampling
    of magnetic bias imposed by beam
  • Operates in zero flux mode, a feedback current
    equal and opposite to the beam is driven through
    the toroidal cores of the device
  • Practical DCCTs for particle beams are a
    combination DC section and AC transformer to
    prevent aliasing and extend bandwidth
  • Useful in synchrotrons and storage rings, not
    transport lines
  • Advantages
  • Measures 0 Hz (DC) component of bunched or
    unbunched beams
  • Long term stability and lt1 microampere DC
    resolution
  • Disadvantage
  • Relatively expensive for applications not
    requiring DC response

32
Common Types of Beam Current Transformers
  • Classical AC Transformer
  • Beam current couples magnetic flux to toroidal
    transformer core inducing current in sense
    winding on same core
  • Output signal can provide hi fidelity
    representation of beam current pulse shape over
    wide bandwidth (10s of Hz to few MHz)
  • Passive device that can be supplemented with
    various active circuits to modify performance
    (e.g. Hereward and active-passive
    configurations
  • Advantages
  • Simple and available in many configurations to
    suit application
  • Disadvantages
  • NOT DC coupled, provides NO DC output component

33
Zshunt
  • Circuit elements as depicted are often used to
    realize Zshunt
  • Multiple elements in parallel should be
    distributed across the gap more or less uniformly
    around the circumference
  • Zshunt must be sufficiently high impedance at
    beam current frequencies to be measured so as not
    to short circuit the gap as seen by the current
    monitor, typically gt10 ohms is acceptable
  • Series RC network blocks low frequency external
    noise currents from flowing across gap and
    through monitor
  • Parallel RC network exhibits lower impedance at
    high frequencies

34
Classical Transformer Review
  • Steady state circuit equations in Laplace
    notation
  • Total magnetic flux in core
  • Load side current
  • Primary side loop

35
Classical Transformer Review
  • Simultaneous solution and use of
    , where Np and Ns are the number of primary and
    secondary winding turns respectively, yields
  • In mid-band where this
    simplifies to

36
Classical Transformer Review
  • In the case of the beam current it is appropriate
    to replace the voltage generator by an equivalent
    current generator
  • where and
  • Substituting into Eqn. T1 with , find
  • Given that , the familiar result
    is obtained.

37
Noise Reduction Core on Coax
Top trace - no core Second -
5 turns of coax through core Third - 10 turns
Fourth - many turns
38
Noise Signals and Spectra w/Core
  • No core
  • 10 turns
  • Signals at 50mV/div and 40msec/div and spectra at
    10dB/div and 125 Hz/div, except no core is 500
    Hz/div.
  • 5 turns
  • many turns

39
How Does the Core Help? To Z or not to Z?
  • Noise measurements showed very low impedance
    source
  • A perfectly conducting cable shield could short
    out the noise source, thereby eliminating the
    noise
  • Yet apparently adding impedance to the shield
    in the form of a core also reduces the noise
  • Dilemma -
  • Increase shield impedance to reduce noise
    currents?
  • Reduce shield impedance to attenuate noise source
    voltage?
  • Solution -
  • Low impedance noise is not completely overcome,
    core acts as transformer coupling equal voltage
    to shield and center conductor

40
Toroid on a Coaxial Cable
  • Shield and center conductor circuits, each
    looping core N times, link same magnetic flux in
    core and will therefore experience same induced
    voltage.

At frequencies above ? R/L, where R is the
shield resistance and L is the inductance of the
shield winding on the core, the end-to-end center
conductor voltage will be identically equal to
the shield voltage, in this case
Vnoise! Therefore the differential
shield-to-center voltage at both ends can be
independent of the noise voltage Note that low
shield resistance is still a good thing. It
reduces the corner frequency at which the
transformer action becomes effective! Dilemma
resolved!
The core cannot influence desired signals
propagating inside coax. With equal and opposite
in shield and center conductor currents, these
signals present no net current to core,
effectively removing the it from the picture.
41
Directional Coupler
Equal signal out and along line
Zo
Zo
Zo
Zo
No signals
Zo
Zo
Zo
Zo
Forward line signal and opposite prompt signal
cancel at downstream port and opposite polarity
signal propagates backwards along line
Resulting signal at upstream port
Upstream port signal also zero in steady state
case if electrode electrical length is ½ bunch
spacing !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com