Title: Using GIS to Evaluate Water-Level Changes in Gillespie, Co. Texas:
1Using GIS to Evaluate Water-Level Changes in
Gillespie, Co. Texas A comparison of two
interpolation methods
Adrien Lindley GIS in Water Resources Fall, 2004
2Outline
- Introduction
- Base map Construction
- Interpolating Piezometric Surfaces
- Raster Calculations
- Results and Conclusions
3Introduction
- Goals
- Create a base map with water level elevations for
the Hensel sands in Gillespie county. - Create grids depicting the water level elevation
for 3 consecutive years using Inverse Distance
Weighting (IDW) and Spline. - Calculate the change in water table elevations
from year to year. - Evaluate the results.
4Introduction
- Where is Gillespie County?
5Gillespie county, a closer view
6Base Map Construction
- Data Sources
- TWDB
- HUWCD
- TNRIS
- Data Type
- Aquifer Coverages
- Groundwater Database (dBase format)
- Well locations
- Depth to water
- DEMs and Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quads
- TxDOT Gillespie county road coverage
7Database Management
- Well databases included well location, depth of
water from land surface elevation, land surface
elevation (LSE), date of water level measurement,
aquifer code and state well number. - Sorted well data by date of water level measure
in Excel. - Selected out all the July water level
measurements for each year. - Resorted each database table for the Hensel
aquifer. Using the aquifer codes. - Created new database tables for for the years
2001, 2002 and 2003.
8Initial base map with all wells
9Base map with sorted wells
10Interpolating Water Level Data
- Spatial analyst
- Set extent of analysis to be the same as the data
extent - Interpolate to raster water level elevations
using IDW and Spline for the 3 years of data - Make permanent the resulting grids
11Spatial extent for analysis
12Water level elevations for July, 2001 using IDW
13Water level elevations for July, 2002 using IDW
14Water level elevations for July, 2003 using IDW
15Water level elevations for July, 2001 using
Spline
16Water level elevations for July, 2002 using
Spline
17Water level elevations for July, 2003 using
Spline
18Using Raster Calculator
- Water level elevation grids are subtracted to
yield yearly water level change
-
19ResultsCalculations for Yearly Difference
20Water level change from 2001 to 2002 from IDW
grids
- Brown indicates an area where the water table has
lowered
Elevations in feet
Mean water level change - 1.07 feet
21Water level change from 2002 to 2003 from IDW
grids
- Brown indicates an area where the water table has
lowered
Elevations in feet
Mean water level change 3.19 feet
22Water level change from 2001 to 2003 from IDW
grids
- Brown indicates an area where the water table has
lowered
Elevations in feet
Mean water level change 2.12 feet
23Water level change from 2001 to 2002 from Spline
grids
- Brown indicates an area where the water table has
lowered
Elevations in feet
Mean water level change - 2.01 feet
24Water level change from 2002 to 2003 from Spline
grids
- Brown indicates an area where the water table has
lowered
Elevations in feet
Mean water level change - 4.09 feet
25Water level change from 2001 to 2003 from Spline
grids
- Brown indicates an area where the water table has
lowered
Elevations in feet
Mean water level change - 6.10 feet
26Comparison of raster calculation results
- Similar values for 2001 to 2002
- Difference in water table elevations of 7.28 feet
for 2002 2003. - Which method is more accurate?
27IDW or Spline?
- IDW
- Chunky display, obviously not representative of
natural conditions
- Spline
- Smoother display, probably more representative of
natural conditions
28Conclusions
- Limited well control across the area for a
specific time and aquifer yields questionable
results
29Acknowledgments
- Special thanks to Paul Tybor and Margaret Ratliff
of the Hill Country Underground Water
Conservation District
30Thanks