Assessing the Credibility of Sources - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Assessing the Credibility of Sources

Description:

Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed vs. other) Chapters in Books ... Conference Proceedings (All or selected that aren't peer reviewed) Final and Technical Reports ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: maureenda
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assessing the Credibility of Sources


1
Assessing the Credibility of Sources
  • 5 Aspects

2
1. Source of Publication
  • Books (University Scholarly Presses vs. Popular
    Presses)
  • Journal Articles (Peer Reviewed vs. other)
  • Chapters in Books
  • Conference Books (Selected papers that are peer
    reviewed)
  • Conference Proceedings (All or selected that
    arent peer reviewed)
  • Final and Technical Reports

3
Additional Considerations
  • 2. Reputation of Author
  • 3. Landmark Works
  • 4. Recentness of Publication

4
5. Type of Research in Relation to Questions Asked
  • Empirical
  • Historical
  • Theoretical
  • Textual Analysis
  • Personal or Anecdotal

5
Reading/Writing Scholarly Introductions
  • John Swales Create a Research Space (CARS)
    Model
  • Three Common Moves
  • in scholarly introductions
  • John Swales, Genre Analysis English in Academic
    and Research Settings. Cambridge UP, 1990.

6
Move 1 Establishing the Territory
  • Step 1 Claiming Centrality of Research
    Area and/or the following
  • Step 2 Making topic generalizations about current
    state of knowledge in the area
  • Step 3 Reviewing prior research (review of
    literature)

7
Move 2 Establishing a Niche
  • Step 2 A Indicating a Gap (in topic/methods/
    theories)
  • OR
  • Step 2B Continuing a tradition (extending
    knowledge)
  • OR
  • Step 2C Raising Questions
  • OR
  • Step 2D Counter-Claiming (challenging or
    problematizing research)

8
Move 3 Occupying the Niche
  • Step 3A Outlining Purposes or Announcing main
    feature of present research obligatory
  • Step 3B Announcing principle findings optional
  • Step 3C Indicating or Forecasting organization of
    the essay not always present but a good idea

9
Using Theoretical Frames
  • --to guide research questions
  • --to guide methodology

10
Moving from Questions to Review of Literature and
Research Project
  • Initial Research Question
  • How might needlework be understood as a literate
    practice?
  • Background reading on scholarship of needlework,
    literate practice, rhetorical, literary,
    cultural, and textile scholarship on needlework
    art/craft scholarship, current discussions about
    needlework, museum holdings of needlework

11
17th-Century Samplers
  • British circa 1600-1630 (VA)
  • British circa 1630-1699 (VA)

12
18th-Century Samplers
  • Jenny Beaman 1736 Sampler (Montague)
  • Ann Smith 1767 Sampler (FW Museum)

13
Operationalizing Foucaults Theory and Method
  • Definition of History History is the
    descriptive analysis and theory of various
    transformations (Politics 59)
  • Method I do not question discourses about their
    silently intended meanings, but about the fact
    and conditions of their manifest appearance not
    about the contents which they may conceal, but
    about the transformations which they have
    effected not about the sense preserved within
    them like a perpetual origin, but about the field
    where they coexist, reside and disappear
    (Politics 60)
  • Foucault, M. Politics and the Study of
    Discourse. The Foucault Effect.

14
What transformations should be attended to?
  • Within a given discursive formation, detect the
    changes which can affect its objects, operations,
    concepts and theoretical options
  • What objects, operations (practices), concepts,
    and theoretical options can be identified in the
    discursive formation of needlework samplers?
  • What changes in these do I detect?

15
What transformations should be attended to
  • 2. Detect changes which affect the discursive
    formations themselves.
  • Displacement of boundaries which define the field
    of possible objects
  • New position and role occupied by speaking
    subject in the discourse
  • New mode of functioning of language with respect
    to objects
  • New form of localization and circulation of
    discourse within a society

16
Questions of transformation
  • Displacement of boundaries which define the field
    of possible objects
  • What are the boundaries within which this
    discursive formation (needlework samplers) take
    place? Where, under what circumstances, etc.
  • How have the boundaries changed over time?
  • What, if anything, has been displaced for what?

17
Questions of transformation
  • New position and role occupied by speaking
    subject in the discourse
  • Who are the speaking subjects (needlework sampler
    makers)?
  • What position(s) and role(s) have they occupied?
  • In what ways, if any, have these positions and
    roles changed?

18
What transformations should be attended to
  • New mode of functioning of language with respect
    to objects
  • In what ways has the functioning of discourse (or
    samplers) changed regarding the discursive
    formation of samplers?

19
What transformations should be attended to
  • New form of localization and circulation of
    discourse within a society
  • Where have samplers been located and circulated?
  • Have changes in these occurred? What?

20
What transformations should be attended to
  • 3. Changes which simultaneously affect several
    discursive formations.
  • Inversion of a diagram hierarchy
  • What hierarchical relationships have existed
    within which sampler making has participated?
    (e.g., in art/craft, word/image)
  • Change in nature of directing principle
  • What change in the nature of directing principle
    (creativity) has occurred?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com