Approaches to Assessing Critical Thinking - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Approaches to Assessing Critical Thinking

Description:

12 May 2000: Approaches to Assessing Critical Thinking ... Analyticity. CT Self confidence. Cognitive maturity. Truth-seeking. 9. Critical thinking skills ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: edu154
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Approaches to Assessing Critical Thinking


1
Approaches to Assessing Critical Thinking
EDU Lunchtime Seminar
12 May 2000
  • Kam-Por Kwan x6287 etkpkwan_at_
  • Patrick Lai x6294 etktlai_at_

2
Seminar series
  • 12 May 2000 Approaches to Assessing Critical
    Thinking
  • 18 May 2000 Overcoming the Challenges in
    Developing Students Critical Thinking
  • 9 June 2000 Measuring Students Critical
    Thinking Problems and Possible Solutions

3
Outline of todays session
  • Overview of approaches to assessing critical
    thinking (CT)
  • Examples
  • Relative advantages and disadvantages
  • Appropriateness for different purposes of CT
    assessment
  • Applicability to your context
  • PolyU Special Interest Group for Teaching and
    Assessing CT

4
Purposes of CT assessments
  • Programme/subject evaluation evidence of success
    in promoting CT
  • Authentic assessment
  • evidence of effectiveness of CT instruction
  • motivating students to be better at CT
  • Diagnostic feedback on students CT level
  • for designing instruction
  • for faciliating students growth development
  • Research into CT instructions
  • Selecting students for admission

5
Definition of CT
  • Ennis (1993 180) Critical thinking is
    reasonable reflective thinking focused on
    deciding what to believe or do
  • APA Delpi Report (1990) Critical thinking is
    the process of purposeful, self-regulatory
    judgement. This process gives reasoned
    consideration to evidence, contexts,
    conceptualisations, methods and criteria.

6
Deciding what to believe or do
  • Judge the credibility of sources
  • Identify conclusions, reasons, and assumptions
  • Judge the quality of an argument acceptability
    of its reasons, assumptions, and evidence
  • Develop and defend an issue
  • Ask appropriate clarification questions
  • Plan experiments amd judge experimental designs
  • Define terms in a way appropriate for the context
  • Be open-minded
  • Try to be well-informed
  • Draw conclusions when warranted, but with caution

7
CT Dispositions and skills
  • Two components of critical thinking (Facione ,
    1996)
  • Affective dispositions the necessary attitudes
    and habits in approaching problems, questions,
    and issues for CT to take place
  • Cognitive skills the mental ability needed for
    critical thinking

8
Critical thinking dispositions
Open-mindedness
Inquisitiveness
Systematicity
Dispositions towards CT
Analyticity
Cognitive maturity
Truth-seeking
CT Self confidence
9
Critical thinking skills
Inference
Analysis
Explanation
CT Skills
Interpretation
Evaluation
Self-regulation
Source Facione (1996)
10
Approaches to CT assessments
  • Students self-reported skills / gains in CT
  • Students performance on standardised published
    CT tests
  • Instructor-constructed CT tests
  • Student interviews / protocol analysis
  • Students performance on tasks requiring CT
    skills
  • performance assessment
  • rubric for assessing CT in students work

11
Self-reported skills /gains in CT
  • Students self reports on
  • skills in CT
  • gains or progress in CT skills
  • Examples
  • Items from CSEQ
  • Items from IDEA
  • Relatively easy and inexpensive to use
  • Less reliable and valid

12
Published CT tests
  • Standardised tests with well-established
    psychometric properties
  • Examples
  • The California Critical Thinking Test College
    level (CCTST)
  • Cornell Critical Thinking Test, Level Z (1985)
  • Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (1980)
  • Reliability and validity established , often with
    norms for comparison
  • Expensive to use, non subject-specific, implicit
    cultural and contextual assumptions

13
Instructor-constructed CT tests
  • Developed by instructor
  • Can be tailored for specific subject, context, or
    purpose
  • Relatively costly to design (both in time and
    effort), reliability and validity need to be
    determined, difficult to compare across groups or
    contexts

14
Interview or protocol analysis
  • Students given a problem to solve in an interview
  • to find out ways person understands a concept or
    solves a problem
  • Researcher analyses students explanation, and
    infers from that to form the researchers
    description
  • Result consists of categories which describe
    different ways of understanding a concept or
    solving a problem
  • These categories stand in a logical hierarchical
    relationship with one another and have
    implications for teaching

15
Interview method
  • Students given a problem to solve in an interview
  • They are asked to think aloud and tell the
    interviewer their thoughts as they are going
    through
  • Probing/Prompted questions
  • You mentioned about X. How does this occur?
  • Do these symbols have any meaning to you?
  • Why did you give up your original hypothesis?

16
Protocol / data analysis
  • Verbatim transcription of audio-taped interviews
  • Transcription printed and read through with a
    particular research question in mind
  • Descriptive words or phrases attached to short
    sections of the transcript as a potential
    category
  • Sections of the transcript that could fit into
    this potential category labelled by
    sub-categories
  • Content of one excerpt compared and contrasted
    with the content of another similarly labelled
    excerpt
  • Labelled excerpt organised into flow charts.

17
Performance assessments
  • Students written and / oral descriptions
    analysed by the Holistic Critical Thinking
    Scoring Rubric (HCTSR) (Facione and Facione,
    1994)
  • HCTSR measures
  • critical thinking skills to reach a judicious
    judgment which include analysis, interpretation,
    evaluation, inference, explanation
  • assesses dispositions to pursue reasons and
    evidence fair mindedly and open-mindedly to reach
    sound, objective decision
  • HCTSR consists of four levels - level 4 signifies
    a critical thinker

18
Assessing CT under the 3-P model
19
CT Assessment for different purposes
20
SIG for teaching assessing CT
  • Sharing of resources and experiences in teaching
    and assessing CT through
  • e-newsletter
  • regular meetings
  • Collaboration in designing and evaluating CT
    instructions
  • trying out innovative methods for CT instruction
  • small-scale classroom research
  • Contact persons
  • Patrick Lai etktlai_at_polyu.edu.hk x6294
  • K. P. Kwan etkpkwan_at_polyu.edu.hk x6287
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com