URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

Description:

Ideally, smooth wide walking space free from obstructions. Clear safe frequent crossing points ... new passengers transferred from car. Bath Rd, Bristol, bus ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:554
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: MagMarg6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT


1
URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
2
What you will (hopefully!) learn in this session
  • What traffic management is
  • Why you do it
  • How you might enforce it
  • What it can achieve
  • What it might cost
  • (Briefly) how you might implement it

3
Structure of session
  • Introduction and categorisation of traffic
    management measures
  • Focusing in on certain types
  • Enforcement exercise
  • More details of different types of traffic
    management including costs and what theyve
    achieved
  • Group exercise based on arterial street

4
DEFINITION OF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
  • Traffic Management is
  • the process of adjusting or adapting the use of
    an existing road (system) to meet specified
    objectives without substantial new road
    construction.
  • So strong links to other topics in this and other
    ELTIS workshops
  • Cycling
  • Safety
  • Parking

5
So what are some objectives of TM?
  • What do you think?

6
Categorisation of TM measures
  • Public transport priority
  • Street management to share space differently or
    make space feel different
  • Traffic system optimisation
  • Access controls and pricing

7
In this session, we concentrate on
  • Public transport priority such as
  • bus (or tram) lanes,
  • better bus stops,
  • Public transport (PT) priority at signals,
  • PT-only sections of road,
  • turns that only PT vehicles can make
  • Street management to share space differently or
    make space feel different such as
  • Parking regulations
  • Wider and more comfortable footways, road
    narrowings, level changes
  • Better crossings
  • Shared space
  • Why only these two categories of measure for this
    training?

8
ENFORCEMENT DISCUSSION
  • Many TM measures work only with proper
    enforcement but how does proper enforcement
    work for you?
  • In multi-national groups of 5 discuss the
    following questions
  • Think about a traffic management measure in your
    city that doesnt work well because drivers dont
    comply with (respect) it e.g. a bus lane or a
    parking regulation
  • How (well) is the measure enforced? What is the
    penalty for not complying?
  • How could you improve compliance with TM measures
    generally?
  • Are there any examples of traffic management or
    parking measures in your towns and cities where
    compliance with the measures is good and/or has
    improved recently? How is this achieved?

9
FIRST OF ALL. MAKING STREETS FEEL DIFFERENT
10
Footways and simple crossings
  • Ideally, smooth wide walking space free from
    obstructions
  • Clear safe frequent crossing points
  • Dropped kerbs and tactile paving - 1300 per pair
  • Rebuilt footway 20-150 per sq m
  • Building footway into road space - 50-200 per
    sq m

11
Slightly more expensive crossings
Signalled crossings with raised road surface -
25000 Painted signed crossings - 3000 (but
dont forget dropped kerbs unless you have)
entry treatments on side road junctions
priority to pedestrians - 7000 maybe with
widened footway/narrowed junction mouth
12
Pedestrianisation
  • Pedestrianisation it is nice but its not cheap
  • UK costs 800,000 to 1.3 million per 100m of
    street!
  • Spain - 300,000

13
Signage
  • Cheap and effective if compliance/enforcement
    good
  • One way streets for cars two way for bikes and/or
    buses
  • 30 kph zones
  • Sign and pole cost 120 plus installation
  • Parking restrictions signs and painted lines _at_
    0.70 per m
  • Parking ticket machines 7,000 (but you could use
    SMS parking payment)
  • Would this work in your city?

14
30 kph zones (with speed cushions)
Slow cars but not buses 1000-1500 per cushion
15
Minimum widths (UK)
  • Traffic lane, no parking 2.8m
  • Traffic lane with parking 4.5m
  • Cycle lane on street 1m (sometimes 0.8m)
  • One-way cycle path off-street 2.5m
  • Two way cycle path off-street 3.5m
  • Footway for pedestrians depends on flow but
    absolute minimum 1m, comfortable minimum in
    low-flow situations 2.5m

16
Shared space
  • Costs as for pedestrianisation
  • Effects reduces accidents, improves local
    economy, and enhances traffic flow
  • Lets watch some videos

17
EXAMPLES ADONIS Project(4th Framework) Local
street improvements
ADONIS Final Report Pages 40 and 41
18
EXAMPLES ADONIS Project (4th Framework) Local
street improvements
ADONIS Final Report Pages 22 and 40
19
Impacts of such measures
  • One example CIVITAS Burgos (ES) access
    restrictions
  • 4 square km in city centre
  • All with access restrictions (bollards) 25
    completely pedestrianised
  • Results
  • 25 reduction in CO2 levels in the historical
    centre
  • 30 reduction in vehicles circulating including
    20 in HGVs
  • Road safety

20
Economic impacts of traffic management
  • Specifically, impacts of shared space,
    streetscape improvements, parking management,
    pedestrianisation
  • See Whitehead et al (2006) left and Sandahl
    and Lindh (1995) below

21
SECONDLY PRIORITY FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORT
22
(No Transcript)
23
What is PT priority 1
  • Any physical measure on the highway which
    protects PT vehicles from or allows them to
    bypass congested sections of road
  • Any physical measure on the road which protects
    PT vehicles from the effects of parked vehicles
  • Hierarchy of measures from turning ban exemptions
    through to full segregation (tram or busway)
  • Is it giving capacity to public transport?

24
Effect of PT lane on junction capacity
25
What is PT priority 2
  • Turning ban exemptions and entry restrictions
  • With-flow bus lanes
  • Contra-flow bus lanes

26
What is PT priority 3
  • Bus advance areas
  • Bus only streets
  • Bus boarders

27
Does PT priority work?
  • Uxbridge Rd, London
  • 42km route 2-way, of which 6 km bus lane
  • Excess waiting time down 30 in 3 years 1993-1996
  • Pax numbers up 20
  • Burdett Rd, London (bus lane and pre-signals)
    1990 to 1995
  • SB am peak 411 seconds down to 397
  • SB pm peak 735 seconds down to 398
  • SB am peak 578 seconds down to 575
  • SB am peak 1100 seconds down to 517

28
Does PT priority work?
  • Route 220, London
  • 1993-1995 14.5 reduction in journey time
  • Patronage increased by 10
  • 3.7 of new passengers transferred from car
  • Bath Rd, Bristol, bus lanes 1992
  • Before average journey time 214, after 123
  • SD down from 55 to 138

29
EXAMPLES CAPTURE Project (4th Framework)
Bucharest Physical Measures
Implementing a public transport lane on one side
of a 600 metres corridor together with stop
platform facilities
CAPTURE Deliverable 8 Page 1.159
30
EXAMPLES INCOME Project(4th Framework) Public
Transport Priority UTC London
Sample SPRINT Strategy Saving in Average Bus Delay (Secs/Junction)
Main Road Links Green Extensions only Green Extensions and recalls 1.8 2.0
Side Road Links Green Extensions only Green Extensions and recalls 2.4 6.4
All Links Green Extensions only Green Extensions and recalls 1.9 2.9
INCOME - Annex A to Final Report Technical
Description, Results and Recommendations, Page A7
31
EXAMPLES INCOME Project(4th Framework) - Public
Transport Priority UTC Gothenburg
Emergency Vehicle Priority - The escape route
along Engelbrektsgatan and the effects on cycle
time and green splits from the ACL impact
ACL impact at intersection 16 Cycle Time Green Split (s)
Before emergency priority (mid-day) 72 s 26 s
During emergency priority (mid-day) 95 s 65 s
Difference 32 150
INCOME - Annex A to Final Report Technical
Description, Results and Recommendations, Page A35
32
EXAMPLES INCOME Project (4th Framework) -
London Integration of Public Transport Priority
and AVL
INCOME - Final Report Pages 13,14
33
Enforcing PT priority
  • Colour bus lanes
  • Use police traffic wardens
  • Automatic enforcement
  • Decriminalise
  • Allow camera enforcement
  • Roadside CCTV and on-bus used in London
  • Croydon used CCTV, issued 47175 tickets
  • Non-compliance down by gt90
  • Newham down by gt74

34
Implementing PT priority
  • ID problems
  • queues, delays, boarding difficulties
  • ID opportunities
  • wide roads one-way systems places to re-route
  • Outline design - consider
  • Operating hours
  • Parking restrictions
  • Requirements for equipment on buses
  • Police resources
  • Consultation

35
Going beyond bus priority
  • Total route treatment e.g. Route 43, London
  • Nicer buses
  • Better stops and access to stops
  • Priority (inc. at signals)
  • Rationalisation of on-street loading
  • Better enforcement
  • Driver training
  • Decent road surface
  • Marketing and information
  • Good operational management
  • Extended to 70 routes over next 3 years - 200
    million

36
Example of arterial street a bit like yours
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com