Transportation Risk Management A New Paradigm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Transportation Risk Management A New Paradigm

Description:

Man-Made Disasters. floods. earthquakes. tornados. fires. hurricanes. etc. Accidental ... No Impact. Catastrophic Impact. Since 9/11/01. Consequence Measures ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:399
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: doc94
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transportation Risk Management A New Paradigm


1
Transportation Risk ManagementA New Paradigm
  • Mark D. Abkowitz
  • Professor of Civil Engineering
  • Vanderbilt University
  • mark.abkowitz_at_vanderbilt.edu

2
Impact of Recent Terrorist Acts
  • Security issues have not received enough explicit
    risk management attention.
  • Event outcomes can be far more severe than
    previously imagined.
  • The bar has been raised on risk management best
    practice to meet public expectations.
  • Conclusion a new paradigm is needed to properly
    integrate these considerations into traditional
    risk management activities.

3
Overarching Observation
  • Transportation security traditional risk
    management share a common objective
  • To reduce the likelihood and consequences of
    disasters so as to protect human health, quality
    of life and the environment
  • This offers the potential to introduce an
    integrated decision-making framework

4
Effect of Shifting Resources From Traditional
Risk Management to Security Initiatives
5
Fundamental Risk Management Questions
6
The Risk Management Spectrum
Natural Disasters
Man-Made Disasters
Accidental
Intentional
  • floods
  • earthquakes
  • tornados
  • fires
  • hurricanes
  • etc.
  • biological
  • chemical/nuclear
  • cyber
  • physical attack

7
Re-Visiting Consequence Scenarios
Since 9/11/01
No Impact
Catastrophic Impact
8
Consequence Measures
  • Fatalities injuries (acute and long-term)
  • Cleanup disposal costs
  • Property product damage
  • Loss due to business interruption
  • Environmental degradation ecosystem damage
  • Traffic community disruption
  • Public anxiety
  • Diminished agency/company value image

9
Re-Visiting Incident Likelihood
Event Likelihood
Since 9/11/01
Consequence
10
Risk Prioritization Process
  • Identify critical transportation facilities
  • Perform risk assessments
  • Develop risk management control strategies
  • - prevention deterrence
  • - preparedness
  • - response
  • - recovery
  • Implement strategy
  • Monitor performance

11
Transportation Vulnerability Points
  • Highways
  • Pipelines
  • Railroads
  • Navigable waterways
  • Air transport networks
  • Fixed facilities (traffic management centers,
    terminals, transfer storage sites, rest areas)
  • Infrastructure hot spots (bridges, tunnels)
  • Vehicles that use these facilities

12
Institutional CoordinationTransportation Risk
Managers
Federal Agencies
Local Agencies
State Agencies
Shippers
Travelers
Carriers
Public
13
Institutional Coordination Security Motivators
  • Need for timely, accurate and protected
    information
  • Increased scale and type of communication
    interfaces to establish and maintain
  • Managing and deploying greater response resources
    to more victims over a larger area

14
Decision-Support Needs
  • Plan track before/during/after a major event
  • Assess prioritize locations in need of risk
    management attention
  • Identify at-risk populations sensitive
    environments
  • Communicate risks to affected parties
  • Locate deploy response resources
  • Estimate damage
  • Identify evaluate mitigation strategies
  • Maintain a centralized risk management
    information system

15
Enabling Tools
  • Knowledge awareness building
  • Process development
  • Intelligence gathering
  • Emergency response planning
  • Information management

16
Information Technologies
  • Surveillance detection
  • Geographic information systems (GIS)
  • Global positioning systems (GPS)
  • Communications devices and networks

17
Summary Conclusions
  • A new paradigm is needed to accommodate
    transportation risks caused by intentional acts
  • It is based on the concept of integrating
    security risk with other transportation risks
  • A highly-coordinated, broad-based, systematic and
    process-oriented approach is fundamental to its
    success
  • Enabling tools, utilizing information technology,
    are needed so risk managers can operate with a
    high degree of confidence

18
(No Transcript)
19
Panel Participants
  • Cherry Burke, Dupont
  • Bob Fronczak, Association of American Railroads
  • Doug Reeves, U.S. Department of Transportation
  • Adam Thiel, Virginia Department of Fire Programs

20
Panel Topics
  • What is transportation risk management (TRM)?
  • Do you distinguish between safety and security in
    addressing TRM considerations? Why or why not?
  • What significant TRM accomplishments have
    occurred since 9/11/01?
  • What critical TRM challenges lie ahead?
  • What is your organization/industry doing to
    address these challenges?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com