Five Focus Areas for Applied Complex Systems Science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Five Focus Areas for Applied Complex Systems Science

Description:

The Promise of Complex Systems Science. Five new areas ... least squares fit ... State space fit. Least squares fit. All figures from Grigg and Boschetti (2005) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: CSI772
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Five Focus Areas for Applied Complex Systems Science


1
Five Focus Areas for Applied Complex Systems
Science
  • John Finnigan CSIRO

2
Contents
  • The Promise of Complex Systems Science
  • Five new areas of application
  • Matching model complexity to system complexity
  • Complex dynamics of urban systems
  • Dynamics of Complex Networks in Biology
  • Prediction and control of social networks
  • Chemical-biological reactive-transport systems
  • Universal themes across these five areas
  • Putting Complex Systems on the same page

3
The Promise of Complex Systems Science
  • Complex Systems Science offers new ways to attack
    previously intractable or wicked problems.
  • The idea of CSS as a field of Science, is
    predicated, however, on the notion that there are
    universal themes that are manifested across
    systems whatever their context and that we can
    discover useful laws describing their behaviour.
  • If this notion of universal themes is valid, it
    means we should be able to transfer insights and
    advances between quite different application
    areas.
  • First we will survey in varying depth, five new
    application areas and then ask whether we can say
    something more general about universal themes in
    complex systems.

4
Matching model complexity to system complexity
  • The problem
  • given observations of a complex system, how do we
    choose the appropriate model complexity to
    reproduce the system dynamics?
  • What happens if an essential part of the system
    dynamics-for example, human interactions, can at
    best be poorly captured by parameterisation?
  • Can we use data assimilation to keep large
    complex models of human ecosystems on-track?
  • Do things get simpler if we have huge numbers of
    agents-eg. Epicast?
  • The relevance
  • A wide range of urgent socio-economic problems
    are being addressed by modelling, either
    explicitly or implicitly. How far can we trust
    the results of these models?

5
Comparing simple ecosystem models in state space
  • Nicky Grigg, CLW
  • Fabio Boschetti, CMAR

6
Typical features of aquatic ecosystem models
  • Dynamic
  • Track the flow of nutrients through sediment and
    water column processes
  • Nonlinear interactions, feedbacks, hysteretic
    responses

All figures from Grigg and Boschetti (2005)
7
Toy example stochastically forced food chain
qZn
Zooplankton mortality Linear mortality (n 1)
only one basin of attraction Quadratic mortality
(n 2) alternative basins of attraction, and
large flips between basins possible.
Source Edwards and Brindley (1999) after Grigg
and Boschetti (2005)
8
Given observations from quadratic mortality
system Aim model the dynamics with a linear
mortality model
9
Comparison of time evolution of phytoplankton
population in reconstructed state space
Parameter search resultleast squares fit
All figures from Grigg and Boschetti (2005)
10
Comparison of time evolution of phytoplankton
population in reconstructed state space (Grigg
and Boschetti, 2005)
Is this a good fit?
All figures from Grigg and Boschetti (2005)
11
Comparison of time evolution of phytoplankton
population in reconstructed state space
All figures from Grigg and Boschetti (2005)
12
Matching model complexity to system complexity
  • How does the implementation of the scientific
    method differ between a complex and a non
    complex problem?
  • How does the implementation of a complex and
    a non complex problem differ?
  • At what stages of a problem life-cycle does
    complexity appear and how is complexity
    manifested?
  • What new concepts/methods/tools need to be
    developed to handle such complexity?
  • We will address these questions in two different
    kinds of complex model
  • Ecological models (see above)
  • Massive agent based models (Epicast)
  • And also consider how we can address gaps in
    functional knowledge by data assimilation into
    (human) ecosystem models

13
Complex dynamics of urban systems
  • The problem
  • Urban ecosystems comprise a set of complex
    subsystems such as transport networks, energy,
    water and sewage reticulation, housing
    infrastructure and information and social
    networks.
  • These interact in a landscape that can be
    described using Euclidean or other metrics and
    have impacts far beyond the urban boundary.
  • Can we find effective and efficient ways of
    modelling the dynamics of whole urban ecosystem
    to guide the transition to future cities?
  • The relevance
  • We have passed the point at which more than half
    the worlds population lives in urban
    environments and the balance continues to shift.
    We need to be able to understand the intrinsic
    dynamics of these environments to avoid social
    disasters.

14
Dynamics of Complex Networks in Biology
  • The Problem
  • The understanding and ultimately control, of gene
    expression in general and stem cell development
    in particular will provide very substantial and
    self-evident clinical benefits.
  • The large amount of clinical and biochemical
    research activity globally is not mirrored by an
    equivalent depth of theoretical modelling, and
    simulation activity.
  • This is surprising, because models provide a more
    logical path to plan and interpret
    hypothesis-driven biochemical experiments, and
    provide a rigorous framework for understanding
    the very complex and nonlinear relationships
    between stem cell components and their
    environments.

15
Dynamics of Complex Networks in Biology
  • Gene expression involves the interaction of many
    individual genes and gene clusters
  • An obvious modeling tactic for this kind of
    system is to simulate it as a dynamic interaction
    network
  • For example, in Boolean network models, nodes
    correspond to gene transcription and translation
    processes, and edges correspond to regulatory
    proteins acting as promoters and repressors.

16
Genetic Regulatory Networks and Epigenetic
Emergence
While real genetic networks are complex, genes
can be approximated as binary switches they are
either on or off. Treating them this way we find
that there are strong constraints on the ways
that the 100,000 genes of higher organisms can
interact.
17
Genetic Regulatory Networks as Boolean Networks
Consider a simple network of 3 genes, A, B, C,
where each gene is affected by two other genes
and possibly itself
We let the interaction between genes A, B and C
be specified by 3 of the 16 possible Boolean
functions of 2 variables. For the given values
of the 2 input variables (genes on or off) ,
these functions specify the value taken by the
output variable (target gene)
Example from Sole and Goodwin (2000)
18
Genetic Regulatory Networks as Boolean Networks
Consider a simple network of 3 genes, A, B, C,
where each gene is affected by two other genes
and possibly itself
We can now specify the state transition table
that shows the values taken by A, B, C at time
T1 given the condition of the 3 genes at time T
Example from Sole and Goodwin (2000)
19
Genetic Regulatory Networks as Boolean Networks
Consider a simple network of 3 genes, A, B, C,
where each gene is affected by two other genes
and possibly itself
(100) (000) (001) (110)
(111) (011) (101) (010)
Finally we can draw the kinematograph of the
system showing how the states change into one
another. One set ends at the point (110) while
the other ends in the cycle (101)?(010)
20
Genetic Regulatory Networks as Boolean Networks
  • Most genetic networks involve far more genes
    than 3 but Kauffman has shown that even with 1000
    genes and 21000 states, the number of end states
    for a network of connectivity k2 is 30. For a
    network of N genes, there is N1/2 end states
    (cell types?)
  • Human genome N25,000? gives 160 end states
  • The reason for the few end states is
    canalization. The state of only one of the two
    input genes determines the transition
  • Networks with higher connectivity
    (k3,4,5,6..) have far more end states and many
    are chaotic
  • However, real gene networks with kgt2 seem to
    use canalized Boolean operators.

An example of a sub-network generated from PBN
modeling applied to a set of human glioma
transcriptome data. (Hashimoto et al., 2004)
21
Dynamics of Complex Networks in Biology
  • The Project aims
  • To develop a modular suite of programs (newly
    written and public domain) to enable
  • the generation of networks from a range of types
    of data
  • modelling of the dynamics of complex networks at
    the molecular, cellular and tissue levels, with a
    range of input data types, gene expression,
    protein-protein interaction etc
  • a modelling layer to predict phenotype from
    biology, with genotyping and phenotyping input
  • To increase the uptake of CSS and systems
    biology by molecular, cellular and tissue
    biologists in CSIRO and elsewhere through the
    demonstration of the utility of the
    methodologies.
  • The different participants and collaborators
    bring a diverse range of expertise and types of
    data to the core project. These include genome
    sequences, gene expression data, whole genome
    scan datasets, epigenetic modification,
    protein-DNA, protein-protein interactions, cell
    lineage and differentiation data.

22
Prediction and control of social networks
  • The Problem
  • This project aims at two of the hard problems in
    the analysis of the interactions within
    organisations
  • Optimal estimation and prediction of the social
    interactions and strategies given incomplete
    noisy data on individual actions (e.g. email
    messages, human reports and telephone traffic).
  • Optimal policy design for controlling social
    networks.
  • The relevance
  • In this work, an organisation is quite general,
    for example a company, a terrorist plot, a
    farming community facing a new regulatory
    environment ..
  • The Approach
  • Mathematical descriptions of social interactions
    within institutions have been developed by inter
    alia Crawford and Ostrom (2004), Soetevent
    (2006), and Manski (2000) 18, 19, 20.
    Despite developing the elements of grammar and
    syntax (or rules), and a typology of interactions
    (constraints, expectations and preferences) this
    work stopped short of estimating models from
    empirical data. This project aims to extend this
    work to derive dynamic models from incomplete data

23
Chemical-biological reactive-transport systems
  • The Problem
  • There seem to be strong similarities between
    the processes that lead to emergent structures in
    fluid systems with reaction and transport,
    whether in rock formation, pollutant transport in
    porous media or atmospheric turbulence.
  • The lack of a common vocabulary has been a
    major barrier to identifying the connections
    between these fields and to the transfer of
    insights.
  • We will adopt a framework based in recent
    advances in non-equilibrium thermodynamics to
    investigate the bounds on instability growth and
    resultant pattern formation in geological
    processes and atmospheric shear flows to build
    this vocabulary and search for common principles.
  • The Relevance
  • In geology, understanding the processes leading
    to ore body formation is critical for mining
    exploration. The formation of coherent eddies
    controls turbulent exchange and transfer between
    the biosphere and atmosphere and parameterizing
    their effect is important in weather climate
    models.

24
An example of emergent structure in shear flow
turbulence above a plant canopy
Unlike the boundary layer profile, the inflected
velocity profile at canopy top is inviscidly
unstable, leading to rapid growth and strong
selection for a single scale proportional to the
vorticity thickness d?. Spanwise Stuart
vortices develop which can be deflected into HU
and HD hairpins. This is the mixing layer
analogy (Raupach et al, 1996).
25
A symmetry breaking mechanism comes into play
near the canopy top
  • The presence of the porous canopy allows
    extensive downward deflections to form HD
    hairpins-as long as their spanwise scale is lthc
  • In the canopy-top shear flow, HD hairpins are
    stretched and rotated faster than HU hairpins so
    HDs dominate
  • Further from the wall, large scale upward
    deflections become dominant again so that HU
    hairpins begin to dominate
  • Finally, inviscid stability analysis suggests
    that HUs and HDs should be formed in pairs as
    observed in the DNS simulations of Gerz et al.
    (1994)

Pierrehumbert and Widnall (1982)
26
Convergence between the underlying ejection and
overlying sweep produces a scalar microfront.
Shear stress ltuwgt is concentrated between the
hairpin legs
The scalar is released from the canopy at a
uniform rate (independent of local wind
velocity). Within a structure, a sloping
microfront is formed with high concentration
below and in advance of the front, while low
concentration follows and is above the
microfront. Blue- ?2 isosurface Green-scalar
microfront Red- uw sweep Orange-uw ejection
27
We have evidence that the Head-up and Head-Down
hairpins are formed simultaneously as the linear
instability theory suggests
28
Global constraints on highly non-linear systems
  • The example above shares a curious property
    with many highly non-linear physical systems.
    The spatial structure of the ensemble average
    form of the emergent eddies are well predicted by
    the eigenfunctions of linear stability theory.
    It is as if the linear eigenfunctions were
    preferred patterns for the fully turbulent
    structures.
  • This observation suggests that some kind of
    minimum principle is operating but for strongly
    dissipative systems no general principles are
    agreed. One candidate-maximum entropy (eg.
    Dewar, 2005)- works well for some examples but
    the bounds on its applicability are unclear.
  • In solid earth mechanics, The emergence and
    growth of instabilities resulting in pattern
    formation have been described in a framework
    based on non-equilibrium thermodynamics derived
    from the classical work of Biot, who showed that
    for many physical-chemical systems the Helmholtz
    Free Energy and the Dissipation Function are
    sufficient to define and track the growth of
    instabilities.
  • We hope that comparing and contrasting these
    systems will lead to new insights.

29
What common themes span these five application
areas?
  • The work on matching model to system complexity
    is of immediate application to the goal of the
    urban ecosystem project
  • The eduction of dynamic social networks using
    incomplete data and a formal grammar relates
    directly to current and projected work that
    derives genetic regulatory networks form data on
    cellular or whole organism response
  • The work on dynamic social networks may provide
    algorithms that capture societal dynamics in the
    human ecosystem models to be studied ultimately
    in the model complexity project
  • Global thermodynamical constraints that are
    applicable to continuum systems should provide
    guidance towards the major question that we face
    in agent based approaches to modelling complex
    adaptive systems
  • How can we establish the connection between
    local interactions and global behaviour in
    discrete systems?

30
Complex systems on one page
Social movements-the zeitgeist
Link from local interaction to emergence not
known but emergence clearly occurs
Gas laws Stat. mech.
31
Complex systems on one page
Probably emergent
No guarantee of emergence Or large fluctuations
Urban Ecosystems
Madness of crowds
Social networks
Link from local interaction to emergence not
known but emergence clear
Complexity of interactions
Ecosystem models
Predictability of crowds
Low dimensional models
Biological Networks
Colonial insects
Majority view, cascading failure
Reaction-transport systems
Ising models SIR models
Understandable via conservation laws
Boids
Gas laws Stat. mech.
1 10 102 103 104 105 106 107
108 109 . . . . . .. . . .
?1026
Number of agents
32
  • The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com