Florida Commission on Mental Health and Substance Abuse - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Florida Commission on Mental Health and Substance Abuse

Description:

Structure and finance in relation to the closure of state hospitals some points ... New professional relationships and boundaries to negotiate. Administrators ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: mco783
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Florida Commission on Mental Health and Substance Abuse


1
Florida Commission on Mental Health and Substance
Abuse
  • Presentation by Martin Cohen
  • July 21, 2000
  • Fort Meyers, Florida

2
Focus of Remarks
  • Structure what you should consider about the
    organization of public mental health services.
  • Finance money drives the system, so think
    carefully about creating the right incentives.
  • Structure and finance in relation to the closure
    of state hospitals some points to consider.

3
Structure
  • Common attributes of people in need of mental
    health services
  • They have an illness that requires treatment.
  • They have a disability that results from the
    illness and that requires more than treatment
    help with living, learning, and working.
  • They tend to have multiple needs co-morbidity
    with other health issues, addictions, etc.
  • They are poor what they need will most likely
    need to be subsidized.

4
Structure
  • Systems of care for people with mental illness
    must respond to all of these issues very
    difficult to do
  • Services are scattered among different provider
    agencies or different levels of government.
  • Funds to support services are in different
    budgets.
  • Systems are often under-funded.
  • Boundaries are created to limit access.
  • Responsibility for how services are organized,
    financed, and delivered are at different levels
    of the bureaucracy.
  • Accountability is not clear and may not match
    with level of responsibility.

5
Structure
  • Need to structure our mental health systems to
    better respond to this organized chaos
  • Understand the dimensions of what people need.
  • Organize systems around those needs.
  • Create mechanisms for multiple systems to work
    together.
  • Reward success and punish failure.

6
Structure
  • Understand what functions are needed and where
    they should best be provided
  • Policy development,
  • Regulator,
  • Purchaser,
  • Provider,
  • Monitor.
  • Establish points of responsibility and
    accountability for each.

7
Structure
  • Start where the client is or to take a page
    from Tip ONeil All care is local.
  • Develop a single point of responsibility and
    accountability for each consumers care.
  • Give that person the authority to get the
    consumer what they need when they need it.
  • If you cant give that person the authority or
    need to limit it, is there clarity about who has
    the authority and how to get it?

8
Structure
  • Create a similar point of responsibility and
    accountability within local communities (central
    authority) who is responsible for mental health
    care in our county? And, what authority do they
    have?
  • Who needs to be part of that authority because
    they have what consumers need or because they are
    too are serving consumers? housing,
    transportation, health care, sheriff, schools,
    child welfare, etc.
  • Develop mechanisms for their participation at the
    consumer and community level.

9
Structure
  • Create similar points of responsibility/accountabi
    lity within the state bureaucracy and bring in
    those who have whats needed (cabinet cluster).
  • Develop ways for these relationships to work up
    and down the system
  • Formal agreements and joint protocols.
  • Out-stationing of staff .
  • Joint purchasing and decision-making.
  • Model behavior.

10
Structure
  • Reward those systems that show performance.
  • Innovation funds.
  • Additional positions.
  • Seek change in those systems that dont or wont.

11
Finance
  • Problems
  • Many funding streams are used to support public
    mental health services.
  • Little coordination among those funding streams.
  • Few financing incentives. Many disincentives.
  • Financing systems built around old treatment
    modalities.
  • While money should follow form, form usually
    follows the money.

12
Finance
  • Solutions
  • Create incentives
  • Local control over inpatient resources.
  • Use of risk-based contracts for community care.
  • Rewards and sanctions based on performance.
  • Funds for innovation.
  • Allow for payment to non-traditional service
    providers.
  • Pay for process. If you want people to behave
    differently - pay for it.

13
Closing a State Hospital
  • Structure
  • What is being planned as the alternative to the
    hospital?
  • Not necessarily hospital beds, but system
    capacity.
  • Units in general hospitals MA, HI
  • Residential placements VT, GA
  • Housing and supports OH, MA
  • Use of other state hospitals PA
  • Who goes where often has more to do with
    perception than clinical reality?

14
Closing a State Hospital
  • What do these new arrangements hold for
    consumers, staff, agencies?
  • Consumers
  • New relationships, locations, routines and
    possibly new freedoms.
  • Staff
  • New professional relationships and boundaries to
    negotiate.
  • Administrators
  • New issues of growth, span of control, and
    finances.
  • Timeframe
  • Give yourself time consider a phased approach.

15
Closing a State Hospital
  • Employees
  • Value of state hospital staff in the community.
  • Know the consumers.
  • Know how to overcome and negotiate obstacles.
  • Issues of staff integration overshadow client
    integration.
  • Inequities in pay and benefits.
  • Need to be part of the community team.
  • Clinical Coordination and Accountability
  • Is there a single point of clinical
    accountability for every client moving from the
    hospital?
  • If there is, who is it? And, who knows it?
  • Clinical coordination after closure - what
    happens if someone needs a higher or lower level
    of care? Who has authority?

16
Closing a State Hospital
  • Finances
  • Potential - financial benefits of closure always
    seem great.
  • Actual what you end up with is often less than
    you anticipated.
  • Residual Some of the best benefits may be in
    whats left redevelopment opportunities -
    housing, jobs or a long-term income stream.
  • Timing you need to prime the pump, cant wait
    for the hospital to produce savings before making
    investments in community system.

17
Final Thoughts
  • Two Warnings about structure and finance
  • Its not about reorganizing.
  • Its not about the amount of funds.
  • It is about designing your system around the
    clinical and support needs of consumers, and
    ensuring that your financing system is flexible
    enough to meet those needs.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com