Robert Cardarelli, Research Manager William J' Havlena, Ph'D', VP, Research Analytics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Robert Cardarelli, Research Manager William J' Havlena, Ph'D', VP, Research Analytics

Description:

Uploaded specific issues to the survey on the 'on-sale' date when measuring ... Email panel allowed us to survey respondents that do not visit the National ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: bil60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Robert Cardarelli, Research Manager William J' Havlena, Ph'D', VP, Research Analytics


1
Frequency of Reading, Recent Reading, Specific
Issue Exposure...Do they give me different
results when evaluating a campaign?
  • Robert Cardarelli, Research ManagerWilliam J.
    Havlena, Ph.D., VP, Research Analytics
  • Dynamic Logic, a Millward Brown Company

2
What Is CrossMedia Ad Effectiveness?
  • What was the branding effect of the media mix?
  • How well did the media work together?
  • How did effectiveness differ across objectives
    and audiences?

3
What Is CrossMedia Ad Effectiveness?
  • It is an evaluation of campaign performance at
    achieving branding goals
  • Uses opportunity-to-see (OTS) to determine
    response to advertising
  • Print OTS may be based on frequency of reading,
    specific issue reading, or recent reading

4
Cell Assignment/Analysis
  • Cells included in any given research design
    depend upon the mediaschedule
  • For the current study, we only looked at the
    incremental value of print advertising

Print OTS
5
Methodology
  • Respondents recruited from National Geographic
    website via web intercept or email from
    subscriber database
  • Web technology allows survey flexibility
  • Cover images could be shown to aid recall of
    specific issues
  • Uploaded specific issues to the survey on the
    on-sale date when measuring Specific Issue
    Readership

6
Methodology
  • Email panel allowed us to survey respondents that
    do not visit the National Geographic website
  • Link technology yielded higher response rate
    than typical online survey ( 10)

7
Methodology
  • 6 advertising campaigns were measured
  • Automotive
  • Pharmaceutical
  • CPG
  • Business-to-Business
  • Total sample of 4,200 respondents with
    opportunity-to-see advertising
  • Qualified by any of the readership conditions

8
Methodology
  • For each advertiser, each respondent was randomly
    served one of 3 readership questions

9
Magazine OTS Recent Reading
  • Used in close to 90 of readership measurement
    surveys around the world
  • Used survey date, recent reading question
    response and on-sale date to map whether
    respondent had opportunity-to-see

10
Magazine OTS Frequency of Reading
  • Frequency is also a common method to determine
    opportunity-to-see advertising
  • Verbal and numerical scales used
  • Data mapping used to line up frequency of reading
    with survey date to determine OTS

11
Magazine OTS Specific Issue Reading
  • Past research has stated that specific issue
    reading is the Gold Standard or the most
    accurate method available to capture a
    respondents opportunity-to-see

Question Example
12
What Brand Metrics Were Tested?
How do you measure where consumers are in the
continuum?
Brand and Advertising Awareness Measures the
level of familiarity respondents have with the
brand (aided and unaided) and its advertising
First, consumers need to be aware of a brand
1.
Message Association Measures the extent to which
respondents can match the message in the creative
to the brand
Then they need to understand the value to them,
or what the product is used for
2.
Brand Favorability Measures the extent to which
respondents have a positive or favorable opinion
of the brand
The consumer forms an opinion about the brand
3.
Purchase Intent Measures the likelihood of
respondents to purchase the brand in the future
Finally, the consumer considers whether he or she
is likely to consume or use the brand
4.
13
How Did OTS Assignment Vary?
  • Recent Reading gave highest OTS estimates
  • Similar results for Frequency of Reading and
    Specific Issue Reading

Number of Respondents classified as having OTS
n1100
n1200
n1140
n1154
n1113
n1118
14
Case Study Automotive
  • Although similar results are seen for most brand
    metrics, Recent Reading was higher for Ad Recall
    and Purchase Intent

Single case study Automotive Campaign n609
C
C
A/B/C statistically significant at 95 confidence
level
15
Aggregate Results 6 Studies
  • For aggregated data, results show minimal
    differences in brand metric scores regardless of
    what method is used

Aggregated Studies n4200
A/B/C statistically significant at 95 confidence
level
16
Aggregate Results 6 Studies
  • Recent Reading had the most significantly higher
    scores however, total was only 5 out of 108
    times

Recent Reading
Frequency of Reading
Specific Issue Reading
Unaided Brand Awareness
Aided Brand Awareness
Ad Recall
Message Association
Brand Favorability
Purchase Intent
17
Conclusions
  • Overall, level of brand metrics is not very
    sensitive to OTS method used
  • Recent Reading may tend to produce slightly
    different results
  • In cases where questionnaire is long, frequency
    of reading may be a better option
  • Easier to standardize across multiple surveys
  • Questionnaire appear shorter when media plans
    have an extensive print schedule
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com