Title: Training Interventions for Improving Worker Safety and Health
1Training Interventions for Improving Worker
Safety and Health
- Michael J. Burke
- Freeman School of Business
- Tulane University
- Congressional Briefing
- Workplace Public Safety The Role of Behavioral
Research - October 5, 2006
2Objectives
- Define safety performance.
- Provide examples of current practice in safety
and health training. - Summarize current theory on learning and safety
and health skill development. - Present study findings concerning the relative
effectiveness of different methods of safety and
health training. - Discuss the implications of current safety
training practices and research findings for
various stakeholders of workplace and public
safety.
3What is Safety Performance?
- The actions that workers engage in to promote the
health and safety of workers, clients, the
public, and the environment. - The actions can be clustered into one of four
general dimensions that apply to individual as
well as team work (Burke, Sarpy, Tesluk,
Smith-Crowe, 2002) - Using personnel protection equipment
- Communicating health and safety information
- Engaging in work practices to reduce risk, and
- Exercising employee rights and responsibilities
4Why is Safety Performance Important?
- Handling organizational disasters and preventing
workplace accidents and injuries, costly problems
focused on subsequent to passage of Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1971. - Cleaning up nuclear waste, preventing and
responding to terrorist acts, and dealing with
the aftermath of natural disasters.
5Workforce PreparationThe Need for Safety and
Health Training
- Among the many challenges and questions
- How do we prepare workers to perform safely?
- My focus is on worker preparation through safety
and health training interventions. - Applying behavioral science principles at
Handfords Volpentest HAMMER (Hazardous Materials
Management and Emergency Response) Training
Center. - Emphasis on hands-on training for almost all
training programs at HAMMER.
6Current Practice Hands-On Training at HAMMER
and Elsewhere
- A sequential procedure for skill development
- Lecture -- standard presentation of material
- Behavioral Role Modeling -- observation,
practice, and feedback - Simulation (drills) -- multiple scenarios
followed by feedback from co-workers or trainers - Follow-up training -- on-the-job and refresher
training - Dialogue, the missing component
7The Movement toward Computer-Based and Distance
Training
- Recent discussions and practice, especially in
regard to emergency preparedness and response
training, are moving toward distance-distance-dis
tance! - The work of CDC Academic Centers. For example,
South Central Center for Public Health
Preparedness. - A Critical Question How effective is more
engaging training such as hands-on relative to
other less engaging forms of training such as
lecture, videos, computer-based and distance
education programs?
8Does More Engaging TrainingEnhance Safety
Outcomes?
9Current Theory and Researchon Learning and Skill
Development
- Stage theories (e.g., Kanfer and Ackerman, 1989)
skill development occurs in stages. - Social learning theory (Bandura 2001) and
integrated approaches to experiential learning
(e.g., Burke, Holman, Birdi, 2006) skill
development is a social process. - In general, these theories emphasize the
development of knowledge and skills by doing
(action) and the importance of feedback. - In contrast to feedback, dialogue has
recently received attention in safety and health
skill development literature (Burke, Scheuer,
Meredith, in press), but virtually no attention
in practice.
10What is Dialogue?
- Dialogue Discussions with others (including
virtual others) concerning actions considered or
taken, and further defined by thought provoking
activities such as questioning, interpreting,
explaining, and evaluating problems at hand. - Dialogue concerning actions considered or taken
is viewed as important because it enhances the
quality of worker reflection (i.e., thinking in
terms of actions).
11The Importance of Action-Focused Reflection
(Thinking)
- Forces trainees to infer causal and conditional
relations between events and activities. - Leads to the development of strategies for
handling unforeseen future events. - Initiates and promotes self-regulatory activities
such as confidence for dealing with unforeseen
events.
12General Expectation
- As training becomes more engaging, dialogue with
others (including virtual persons) is posited to
engender more action-focused reflection, and
consequently, greater knowledge acquisition,
improved performance, and reduced accidents,
illnesses, and injuries.
13The Relative Effectiveness of Worker Safety and
Health Training Methods
- Addressing the question How effective is more
engaging training such as hands-on training
relative to other less engaging forms of
training such as lecture or distance education
programs? (Burke, Sarpy, Smith-Crowe,
Chan-Serafin, Islam, and Salvador, 2006). - A large-scale statistical integration of all
safety and health training studies conducted
between 1971 and 2003 95 studies in total
involving 20,991 trainees from over 15 countries
and 11 occupational families.
14Methods of Safety Training
- Least Engaging Methods
- Lecture
- Films/Videos
- Moderately Engaging Methods
- Programmed Instruction Methods (including most
distance learning activities) - Feedback Interventions
- Most Engaging Methods
- Behavioral Modeling
- Hands-on Training
- As typically delivered with respect to levels of
dialogue and opportunities to role model desired
behaviors.
15Study Expectations and Results
- As one moves along the continuum from passive,
information-based training methods to engaging,
dialogue-centered methods, training is expected
to have a greater effect on - knowledge acquisition most engaging methods
are up to three times more effective than other,
lesser engaging methods - safety performance most engaging training
methods produce the greatest improvements in
safety performance - the reduction of accidents, illnesses, and
injuries most engaging training methods are
considerably more effective than lesser
engaging methods.
16Study Conclusions
- Results are consistent with learning theory
propositions concerning the effects of behavioral
modeling, dialogue, and action-focused reflection
on knowledge and skill acquisition. - Expectations were confirmed across jobs.
- Findings advance our understanding of the
relative effectiveness of different methods of
safety training for reducing accidents and
injuries. - A lesson relearned?
17Implications of Current Training Practices and
Research Findings
- For scientists and granting agencies, a need
exists to better understand - how structured dialogue contributes to safety and
health knowledge acquisition (Burke et al., in
press) - why and how worker motivation can be enhanced
through safety and health training (Wallace
Chen, 2006) - why and how organizational factors such as safety
climate affect the transfer of safety and health
training to the job (Smith-Crowe, Burke,
Landis, 2003)
18Implications of Current Training Practices and
Research Findings
- For practitioners, a call for
- awareness of rationales for why highly engaging
training is more effective than other methods of
training and - to utilize this information when designing safety
and health training interventions.
19Implications of Current Training Practices and
Research Findings
- For public policy makers and advocates, a call
for - funding the needed research to advance the
science and practice of worker safety and health
training - informing the debate on how to best prepare the
public health workforce (in particular, in the
domain of emergency preparedness and response),
and - encouraging research-based practice in the
conduct and evaluation of safety and health
training in private and public organizations.