Simple Extractors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Simple Extractors

Description:

Def (statistical distance): Two distributions on a domain D are e-close if the ... then exists a distribution s.t. X s.t. E(X,Ut) is not e-close to Um, that is: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: ELAD
Category:
Tags: extractors | simple | ut

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Simple Extractors


1
Simple Extractors for all Min-Entropies

R.Shaltiel and C.Umans
2
Definitions
  • Def (min-entropy) The min-entropy of a random
    variable X over 0, 1n is defined as
  • Thus a random variable X has min-entropy at least
    k if PrXx2-k for all x. The maximum possible
    min-entropy for such a R.V. is n
  • Def (statistical distance) Two distributions on
    a domain D are e-close if the probabilities they
    give to any A?D differ by at most e (namely,
    using norm 1)

3
Definitions
  • Def (extractor) A (k,e)-extractor is a
    function E 0,1n ? 0,1t ? 0,1ms.t. for
    any R.V. X with min-entropy k E(X,Ut) is
    e-close to Um(where Um denotes the uniform
    distribution over 0,1m)

4
Parameters
  • The relevant parameters are
  • min entropy of the weak random source input k.
    Relevant values log(n)? k ? n (the seed length
    is t log(n), hence useless to consider lower
    min entropy).
  • seed length t log(n) .
  • Quality of the output e.
  • Size of the output mf(k). The optimum is mk.

5
Extractors
High Min-Entropy distribution
Uniform-distribution seed
2t
2n
2m
E
Close to uniform output
6
Next Bit Predictors
  • Claim to prove E is an extractor, it suffices to
    prove that for all 0ltiltm1 and all predictors
    f0,1i-1?0,1
  • Proof Assume E is not an extractor then exists
    a distribution s.t. X s.t. E(X,Ut) is not e-close
    to Um, that is

7
Proof
  • Now define the following hybrid distributions

8
Proof
  • Summing the probabilities for the event
    corresponding to the set A for all distributions
    yields
  • And because ?ai ?ai there exists an index
    0ltiltm1 for which

9
The Predictor
  • We now define a function f0,1i-1 ? 0,1 that
    can predict the ith bit with probability at
    least ½e/m (a next bit predictor)
  • The function f uniformly and independently draws
    the bits yi,,ym and outputs
  • Note the above definition is not constructive,
    as A is not known!

10
Proof
  • And f is indeed a next bit predictor
  • Q.E.D.

11
Basic Example Safra, Ta-Shma, Zukerman
  • Construction
  • Let BCF?0,1s be a (inefficient) binary-code
  • Given
  • x, a weak random source, interpreted as a
    polynomial xF2?F and
  • s, a seed, interpreted as a random point (a,b),
    and an index j to a binary code.
  • Def

12
Basic Example Illustration of Construction
  • x ? x, s ((a,b), 2)
  • E(x,s)01001

(a,b)
(inefficient) binary code
13
Basic Example Proof Sketch
  • Assume, by way of contradictionexists a next
    bit predicator function f.
  • Next, show a reconstruction function R
  • Conclude, a contradiction!(to the min-entropy
    assumption of X)

14
Basic Example Reconstruction Function
h n1/2 j lgn m desired entropy
Random line
advice Few red points amjO(h)
Repeat using the new points, until all Fd is
evaluated
List decoding by the predictor f
Resolve into one value on the line
15
Counting Argument
  • For Y?? X, let ?(Y)?y?YPry (the weight of Y)
  • Let R0,1a ? 0,1n, s.t. PrxX?z R(z)x ?
    1/2
  • (for a uniform X, R(S) ? X/2 )
  • For an arbitrary distribution X, ?(R(S)) ? ?(X)/2
  • Let X min-entropy ? k,
  • then ?(R(S)) ? 2a-k (there are at most 2a
    strings in R(S), and ?x?X Prx ? 2-k)
  • and therefore k ? a - log2(1/2) (1 ?(X) ?
    ?(R(S)) ?2 ? 2a-k ?2-1 ? a-k hence k ? a1)

2nX
R(S)
R
2aS
16
Problems with Safra, Ta-Shma, Zukerman
  • Curse of dimensionality - too many
    lines!Solution generator matrix.

17
Next-q-it List-Predictor
  • f is allowed to output a small list of l possible
    next elements

18
q-ary Extractor
  • Def Let F be a field with q elements.
  • A (k, l) q-ary extractor is a function E 0,1n
    ? 0,1t ?Fms.t. for all R.V. X with min-entropy
    k
  • and all 0ltiltm
  • and all list-predictors fFi-1 ? Fl

19
Generator Matrix
  • Def Define the generator matrix for the vector
    space Fd as a matrix A?dd, s.t. for any non-zero
    vector v?Fd
  • (that is, any vector 0?v?Fd multiplied by all
    powers of A generates the entire vector space Fd
    except for 0)
  • Lemma Such a generator matrix exists and can be
    found in time qO(d).

20
Construction
  • Let F be a field with q elements,
  • Let Fd be a vector space over F.
  • Let h be the smallest integer s.t.
  • For x? 0,1n, let x denote the unique d-variate
    polynomial of total degree h-1 whose coefficients
    are specified by x.

21
Construction
  • The definition of the q-ary extractor E
    0,1n ? 0,1d log q ? Fm

seed, interpreted as a vector v? Fd
Generator matrix
22
Main Theorem
  • Thm For any n,q,d and h as previously defined,
    E is a (k, l) q-ary extractor if
  • Alternatively, E is a (k, l) q-ary extractor if

23
Whats Ahead
  • Proving existence of a generator matrix
  • How the counting argument works
  • The reconstruction paradigm
  • Basic example Safra, Ta-Shma, Zukerman
  • Proof of the main theorem
  • From extractors to PRGs

24
Extension Fields
  • A field F2 is called an extension of another
    field F if F is contained in F2 as a subfield.
  • Thm For every power pk (p prime, kgt0) there is
    a unique (up to isomorphism) finite field
    containing pk elements. These fields are denoted
    GF(pk).All finite fields cardinality have that
    form.
  • Def A polynomial is called irreducible in GF(p)
    if it does not factor over GF(p)
  • Thm Let f(x) be an irreducible polynomial of
    degree k over GF(p). The finite field GF(pk) can
    be constructed using the set of degree k-1
    polynomials over Zp, with addition and
    multiplication carried out modulo f(x)

25
Extension Fields - Example
  • Construct GF(25) as follows
  • Let the irreducible polynomial be
  • Represent every k degree polynomial as a vector
    of k1 coefficient
  • Addition over this field

26
Extension Fields - Example
  • And multiplication
  • And now modulo the irreducible polynomial

27
Generator Matrix Existence Proof
  • Denote by GF(qd) the multiplicative group of the
    Galois Field GF(qd).
  • This multiplicative group of the Galois Field is
    cyclic, and thus has a generator g
  • Let j be the natural isomorphism between the
    Galois Field GF(qd) and the vector space Fd,
    which matches a polynomial with its vector of
    coefficients

28
Generator Matrix Existence Proof
  • Now define the generator matrix A of Fd as the
    linear transformation that corresponds to
    multiplication by the generator in GF(qd)
  • A is a linear transformation because of the
    distributive property of both the vector space
    and the field GF(qd), according to the
    isomorphism properties

29
Generator Matrix Existence Proof
  • It remains to show that the generator matrix A of
    Fd can be found in time qO(d).
  • And indeed
  • The Galois Field GF(qd) can be constructed in
    time qO(d) using an irreducible polynomial of
    degree d over the field Zq (and such a polynomial
    can also be found in time qO(d) by exhaustive
    search).
  • The generator of GF(qd) can be found in time
    qO(d) by exhaustive search
  • Using the generator, for any basis of Fd, one can
    construct d independent equations so as to find
    the linear transformation A. This linear equation
    system is also solvable in time qO(d) .

30
Reconstruction Proof Paradigm
  • Proof sketch
  • For a certain R.V. X with min-entropy at least k,
  • assume a function f that violates the properties
    of a q-ary extractor,
  • construct another function, R 0,1a ? 0,1n,
    the reconstruction function.
  • This function, using f as a procedure, has the
    property that
  • Applying the counting argument, this is a
    contradiction to the assumption that X has
    min-entropy at least k

31
Proof Sketch
  • Let X be a random variable with min-entropy at
    least k
  • Assume, by way of contradictionexists a next
    bit predicator function f.
  • Next, show a reconstruction function R
  • Conclude, a contradiction!(to the min-entropy
    assumption of X)

32
Main Lemma
  • Lemma Let n,q,d,h be as in the main theorem.
    There exists a probabilistic function
    R0,1a?0,1n with a O(mhd logq) such that
    for every x on which
  • The following holds (the probability is over the
    random coins of R)

33
The Reconstruction Function (R)
  • Task allow many strings x in the support of X to
    be reconstructed from very short advice strings.
  • Outlines
  • Use f in a sequence of prediction steps to
    evaluate z on all points of Fd,.
  • Interpolate to recover coefficients of z,
  • which gives x
  • Next We Show there exists a sequence of
    prediction steps that works for many x in the
    support of X and requires few advice strings

34
Curves
  • Let rQ(d),
  • Pick random vectors and values
  • 2r random points y1,,y2r?Fd, and
  • 2r values t1,,t2r?F, and
  • Define degree 2r-1 polynomials p1,p2
  • p1F?Fd defined by p1(ti)yi, ?i1,..,2r.
  • p2F?Fd defined by p2(ti)Ayi, ?i1,..,r, and
    p2(ti)yi, ?ir1,..,2r.
  • Define vector sets P1p1(z)z?F and
    P2p2(z)z?F
  • ?igt0 define P2i1AP2i-1 and P2i2AP2i(Pi,
    the sequence of prediction steps are low-degree
    curves in Fd, chosen using the coin tosses of R)

35
Curves
Fd
F
36
Simple Observations
  • A is non-singular linear-transform, hence ?i
  • Pi is 2r-wise independent collection of points
  • Pi and Pi1 intersect at r random points
  • zPi is a univariate polynomial of degree at most
    2hr.
  • Given evaluation of z on Av,A2v,,Amv, we may use
    the predictor function f to predict z(Am1v) to
    within l values.
  • We need advice string 2hr coefficients of zPi
    for i1,,m. (length at most mhr log q a)

37
Using N.B.P.
Cannot resolve into one value!
Fd
F
38
Using N.B.P.
Can resolve into one value using the second curve!
Fd
F
39
Using N.B.P.
Can resolve into one value using the second curve!
Fd
F
40
Main Lemma Proof Cont.
  • Claim with probability at least 1-1/8qd over the
    coins tosses of R
  • Proof We use the following tail bound
  • Let tgt4 be an even integer, and X1,,Xn be
    t-wise independent R.V. with values in 0,1. Let
    X?Xi, ?EX, and Agt0. Then

41
Main Lemma Proof Cont.
  • According to the next bit predictor, the
    probability for successful prediction is at least
    1/2vl.
  • In the ith iteration we make q predictions (as
    many points as there are on the curve).
  • Using the tail bounds provides the result.
  • Q.E.D (of the claim).
  • Main Lemma Proof (cont.) Therefore, w.h.p. there
    are at least q/4vl evaluations points of Pi that
    agree with the degree 2hr polynomial on the ith
    curve (out of a total of at most lq).

42
Main Lemma Proof Cont.
  • A list decoding bound given n distinct pairs
    (xi,yi) in field F and Parameters k and d, with
    kgt(2dn)1/2, There are at most 2n/k degree d
    polynomials g such that g(xi)yi for at least k
    pairs.
  • Furthermore, a list of all such polynomials can
    be computed in time poly(n,logF).
  • Using this bound and the previous claim, at most
    8l3/2 degree 2rh polynomials agree on this number
    of points (q/4vl ).

43
Lemma Proof Cont.
  • Now,
  • Pi intersect Pi-1 at r random positions, and
  • we know the evaluation of z at the points in Pi-1
  • Two degree 2rh polynomials can agree on at most
    2rh/q fraction of their points,
  • So the probability that an incorrect polynomial
    among our candidates agrees on all r random
    points in at most

44
Main Lemma Proof Cont.
  • So, with probability at least we learn points
    Pi successfully.
  • After 2qd prediction steps, we have learned z on
    Fd\0 (since A is a generator of Fd\0)
  • by the union bound, the probability that every
    step of the reconstruction is successful is at
    least ½.
  • Q.E.D (main lemma)

45
Proof of Main Theorem Cont.
  • First,
  • By averaging argument
  • Therefore, there must be a fixing of the coins of
    R, such that

46
Using N.B.P. Take 2
Unse N.B.P over all points in F, so that we get
enough good evaluation
Fd
F
47
Proof of Main Theorem Cont.
  • According to the counting argument, this implies
    that
  • Recall that rQ(d).
  • A contradiction to the parameter choice
  • Q.E.D (main theorem)!

48
(No Transcript)
49
From q-ary extractors to (regular) extractors
  • The simple technique - using error correcting
    codes
  • Lemma Let F be a field with q elements. Let
    C0,1klog(q)?0,1n be a binary error
    correcting code with distance at least 0.5-O(?2)
    . If
  • E 0,1n 0,1t -gt Fm is a (k,O(r)) q-ary
    extractor, then
  • E 0,1n 0,1tlog(n) -gt Fm defined by

Is a (k,rm) binary extractor.
50
From q-ary extractors to (regular) extractors
  • A more complex transformation from q-ary
    extractors to binary extractors achieves the
    following parameters
  • Thm Let F be a field with qlt2m elements. There
    is a polynomial time computable function

Such that for any (k,r) q-ary extractor E,
E(x(y,j))B(E(xy),j) is a (k,r logm) binary
extractor.
51
From q-ary extractors to (regular) extractors
  • The last theorem allows using theorem 1 for ?
    O(e/logm) , and implies a (k,e) extractor with
    seed length tO(log n) and output length mk/(log
    n)O(1)

52
Extractor ? PRG
  • Identify
  • string x?0,1log n with the
  • function x0,1log n?0,1 by setting x(i)xi
  • Denote by S(x) the size of the smallest circuit
    computing function x
  • Def (PRG) an ?-PRG for size s is a function
    G0,1t?0,1m with the following property
    ?1?i?m and all function f0,1i-1?0,1i with
    size s circuits,
  • Prf(G(Ut)1...i-1)G(Ut)i ? ½ ?/m
  • This imply
  • for all size s-O(1) circuits C
  • PrC(G(Ut))1 PrC(Um)1? ?

53
q-ary PRG
  • Def (q-ary PRG) Let F be the field with q
    elements. A ?-q-ary PRG for size s is a function
    G0,1t?Fm with the following property ?1?i?m
    and all function fFi-1?F(?-2) with size s
    circuits,
  • Pr?j f(G(Ut)1...i-1)jG(Ut)i ? ?
  • Fact O(?)-q-ary PRG for size s can be
    transformed into (regular) m?-PRG for size not
    much smaller than s

54
The Construction
Note Gx(j) corresponds to using our q-ary
extractor construction with the successor
function Amj
We show x is hard ? at least one Gx(j) is a
q-ary PRG
  • Plan for building a PRG Gx0,1t ? 0,1m
  • use a hard function x0,1log n ? 0,1
  • let z be the low-degree extension of x
  • obtain l candidate PRGs, where ld(log q / log
    m) as followsFor 0?jltl define Gx(j)0,1d log
    q ? Fm byGx(j)(v) z(A1?mjv) ? z(A2?mjv) ?...?
    z(AM?mjv)where A is a generator of Fd\0

55
Getting into Details
Note Fd is a subset of Fd
think of Fd as both a vector space and the
extension field of F
  • perhaps we should just say immediate from the
    correspondence between the cyclic group GF(qd)
    and Fd\0 ??? otherwise in details we may say
  • Proof
  • There exists a natural correspondence between Fd
    and GF(qd), and between Fd and GF(hd),
  • GF(qd) is cyclic of order qd-1, i.e. there exists
    a generator g
  • gp generates the unique subgroup of order hd-1,
    the multiplicative group of GF(hd).
  • A and A are the linear transforms corresponding
    to g and gp respectively.
  • Let F be a subfield of F of size h
  • Lemma there exist invertible d?d matrices A and
    A with entries from F which satisfy
  • ? v?Fd s.t. v?0, AiviFd\0
  • ? v?Fd s.t. v?0, AiviFd\0
  • AAp for p(qd-1)/(hd-1)
  • A and A can be found in time qO(d)

56
  • since hdgtn, there are enough slots to embed all
    x in a d dimensional cube of size hd
  • and since A generates Fd\0, indeed x is
    embedded in a d dimensional cube of size hd
  • Note h denotes the degree in individual
    variables, and the total degree is at most hd
  • The computation of z from x can be done in
    poly(n,qd)qO(d) time
  • require hdgtn
  • Define z as follows z(Ai1)x(i), where 1 is the
    all 1 vector (low degree extension).
  • Recall For 0?jltl define Gx(j)0,1d log q ? Fm
    byGx(j)(v) z(A1?mjv) ? z(A2?mjv) ?...?
    z(AM?mjv
  • Theorem (PRG main) for every n,d, and h
    satisfying hdgtn, at least one of Gx(j) is an
    ?-q-ary PRG for size ?(?-4 h d2 log2q).
    Furthermore, all the Gx(j)s are computable in
    time poly(qd,n) with oracle access to x.

57
  • ??????

58
(No Transcript)
59
Extension Field
  • Def if F is a subset of E, then we say that E is
    an extension field of F.
  • Lemma let
  • E be an extension field of F,
  • f(x) be a polynomial over F (i.e. f(x)?FX),
  • c?E,
  • then f(x)?f(c) is an homomorphism of FX into E.

60
Construction of the Galois Field GF(qd)
  • Thm let p(x) be irreducible in FX, then there
    exists E, an extension field of F, where there
    exists a root of p(x).
  • Proof Sketch
  • add a ?? (a new element) to F.? is to be a root
    of p(x).
  • In F? (polynomials with variable ?)

61
  • Example
  • Freals
  • p(x)x21
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com