Gender, Race - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Gender, Race

Description:

Legal decisions are often reached by using gender (or racial) expectations of ... The natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: michell60
Category:
Tags: delicacy | gender | race

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gender, Race


1
Gender, Race Criminal Law
  • Professor Meloy

2
Gender, Race and Case Law
  • Legal decisions are often reached by using gender
    (or racial) expectations of what is appropriate
    for both men and women (e.g., woman should not be
    allowed to practice law because of the belief it
    is mans work African Americans are an inferior
    race no citizenship)
  • Legal decisions are not only reached relying on
    gender stereotypes they also serve to REINFORCE
    them (e.g., it is natural and right for women
    to pursue domestic duties limits opportunities
    for women outside of the home)

3
Gender Law
  • Traditionally law has been defined in male
    terms/experiences. Has this changed?
  • Examples of gender-neutral laws?
  • Examples of gendered laws?

4
Our Class Mission
  • Analyze how gender/race works in law and how law
    works to produce gender in sex-based criminal
    statues, the role of gender in criminal
    sentencing and criminal punishment, and
    punishment based on womens reproductive
    capacities.

5
Disproportionate Treatment and the Law At a
Glance
  • Women who commit misdemeanor offenses receive
    more lenient sentences than men
  • Women who commit felony offenses or engage in
    unfeminine crimes receive more severe sentences
  • Black women are treated more harshly by the CJS
    than White women
  • War on Drugs legislation is primarily
    responsible for the incarceration of Black
    Americans especially Black Women

6
Law Social ControlAdvantages to Some
Disadvantage to Others through Case Law
7
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
  • Ruled that native-born Blacks could NEVER be
    citizens
  • The question before us is, whether the class of
    persons described in the plea in abatement
    (African Americas) compose a portion of this
    people, and are constituent members of this
    sovereignty? We think they are not and that they
    are not included, and were not intended, under
    the word citizens in the Constitution

8
Bradwell v. Illinois (1873) Upheld exclusion of
women from legal practice
  • The law, as well as nature itself, has always
    recognized spheres and destines of man and women.
    Man is, or should be, womans protector and
    defender. The natural and proper timidity and
    delicacy which belongs to the female sex
    evidently unfits it for many of the occupations
    of public life. The domestic sphere properly
    belongs to the domain of womanhood The family
    institution is repugnant to the idea of a woman
    adopting a distinct and independent career from
    that of her husband.

9
Minor v. Happersett (1875)
  • Ruled that the 14th amendment did not grant women
    the right to vote
  • Being unanimously of the opinion that the
    Constitution of the United States does not confer
    the right of suffrage upon any one, and that the
    constitutions and laws of the States which commit
    that important trust to men alone are not
    necessarily void

10
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
  • Set forth doctrine of separate but equal
  • Legislation is powerless to eradicate racial
    instincts or to abolish distinctions based upon
    physical differences, and the attempt to do so
    can only result in accentuating the difficulties
    of the present situationIf one race be inferior
    to the other socially, the Constitution cannot
    put them upon the same plan.

11
Muller v. Oregon (1908)
  • Permitted sex discrimination in employment
  • The two sexes differ in structure of body, in
    the functions to be performed by each, in
    physical strength, the self-reliance which
    enables one to assert full rights, and in the
    capacity to maintain the struggle for
    subsistence. This difference justifies a
    difference in legislation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com