Chapter 011 - Managing Conflict - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 011 - Managing Conflict

Description:

Compromising approach use as a middle ground. Good backup approach when other approaches ... agreement in a situation characterized by some level of disagreement ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: leswiletzk
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 011 - Managing Conflict


1
(No Transcript)
2
Managing Conflict and Negotiations
11
3
For any organization to perform effectively,
interdependent individuals and groups must
establish working relationships across
organizational boundaries, between individuals,
and among groups. Such interdependence may foster
either cooperation or conflict.
4
A Contemporary Perspective
  • Conflict is neither inherently good nor bad, but
    is inevitable
  • In dealing with conflict the critical issue is
    how it is managed
  • Conflict is defined in terms of the effect it has
    on the organization
  • functional conflict
  • dysfunctional conflict

5
Functional Conflict (1 of 2)
  • A confrontation between groups that enhances and
    benefits the organizations performance
  • Without this type of conflict in organizations
  • there would be little commitment to change
  • most groups likely would become stagnant

6
Functional Conflict (2 of 2)
  • Functional conflict can
  • lead to increased awareness of problems that need
    to be addressed
  • result in broader and more productive searches
    for solutions
  • generally facilitate positive change, adaptation,
    and innovation

7
Dysfunctional Conflict
  • Any confrontation or interaction between groups
    that harms the organization or hinders the
    achievement of organizational goals
  • Management must seek to eliminate dysfunctional
    conflict

8
Relationship Between Intergroup Conflict and
Organizational Performance
Level of Intergroup Conflict
Level of Organizational Performance
Probable Impact on Organization
Organization Characterized By
Low or none
Slow adaptation to environment Few changes
Little stimulation of
ideas Apathy Stagnation
Low
Dysfunctional
Situation I
Optimal
Functional
High
Situation II
Positive movement toward goals Innovation and
change Search for problem solutions Creativity
and quick adaptation to environmental changes
Disruption Interference with
activities Coordination difficulties Chaos
Low
Dysfunctional
High
Situation III
9
Stages of Conflict
Perceived Conflict
Intergroup conflicts develop over a period of time
Felt Conflict
Manifest Conflict
10
What Causes Intergroup Conflict?
  • Work Interdependence
  • Pooled interdependence
  • Sequential interdependence
  • Reciprocal interdependence
  • Goal Differences
  • Mutually exclusive goals
  • Perceptual Differences
  • Status incongruency
  • Inaccurate perceptions

11
Group A
Types of Interdependence
POOLED
Goals
Group B
Group A
Group B
SEQUENTIAL
Goals
Group A
Group B
Goals
Goals
RECIPROCAL
12
Problems Related to Goal Differences
  • Groups with mutually exclusive goals can find
    themselves in conflict
  • Allocating limited resources between groups
    increases mutual dependencies and differences in
    goals are more apparent
  • Different time horizons needed by groups to
    achieve their goals can be a source of conflict

13
Minimizing Perceptual Bases for Conflict
  1. Communicate effectively!
  2. Help develop a groups social sensitivity.
  3. Emphasize behavioral flexibility.
  4. Communicate effectively!

14
The Consequences of Dysfunctional Intergroup
Conflict
  • Changes Within Groups
  • Increased group cohesiveness
  • Emphasis on loyalty
  • Rise in autocratic leadership
  • Focus on activity
  • Changes Between Groups
  • Distorted perceptions
  • Negative stereotyping
  • Decreased communication

15
Managing Intergroup Conflict Through Resolution
16
Conflict-Resolution Grid
Accommodating or Smoothing
Problem Solving or Collaboration
Allowing other group to win
Working together to solve problems
HIGH
Compromising
Finding acceptable solution so everyone feels good
EXTERNAL FOCUS
Avoiding
Dominating
LOW
Ignoring or steering clear of other group
Working to dominate and control
HIGH
LOW
INTERNAL FOCUS
17
When to Use the Different Conflict-Resolution
Approaches (1 of 3)
  • Dominating approach use on important issues
  • where you are certain you are right, and
  • where the benefit of a resolution outweighs the
    drawback of possible negative feelings by the
    dominated group
  • Accommodating approach use in disputes that are
    of far greater importance to the other group than
    they are to your group

18
When to Use the Different Conflict-Resolution
Approaches (2 of 3)
  • Problem-solving approach use when both groups
    are willing to invest time and effort to reach a
    resolution that maximizes everyones outcome
  • Avoiding approach use primarily as a temporary
    expedient to buy more time

19
When to Use the Different Conflict-Resolution
Approaches (3 of 3)
  • Compromising approach use as a middle ground
  • Good backup approach when other approaches fail
    to resolve the issue

20
Stimulating Constructive Intergroup Conflict
  • Bringing outside individuals into the group
  • Altering the organizations structure
  • Stimulating competition
  • Making use of programmed conflict

21
Negotiations (1 of 2)
  • Negotiations a process in which two or more
    parties attempt to reach acceptable agreement in
    a situation characterized by some level of
    disagreement

22
Negotiations (2 of 2)
  • In an organizational context, negotiation may
    take place
  • 1. between two people
  • 2. within a group
  • 3. between groups
  • 4. over the Internet

23
Elements of Negotiations
  1. Some disagreement or conflict exists
  2. There is some degree of interdependence between
    the parties
  3. The situation must be conducive to opportunistic
    interaction
  4. There exists some possibility of agreement

24
Win-Lose Negotiating
  • Classical view that negotiations are a form of a
    zero-sum game
  • i.e., to whatever extent one party wins
    something, the other party loses
  • Also known as distributive negotiating
  • i.e., the process of distributing scarce
    resources

25
Win-Win Negotiating
  • A positive-sum approach
  • i.e., situations where each party gains without a
    corresponding loss for the other party
  • Does not mean that everyone gets everything they
    wanted
  • An agreement has been achieved which leaves all
    parties better off than they were prior to the
    agreement

26
Negotiation Tactics
27
Variables That Affect Negotiations
  • There is no one best way to negotiate
  • The selection of specific negotiation strategies
    and tactics depends on
  • 1. The nature of the issues being negotiated
  • 2. The environment in which the negotiations take
    place
  • 3. The nature of the outcomes desired from the
    negotiations

28
Negotiations Desired Outcomes
  • Substantive Outcomes
  • Have to do with how the specific issue is settled
  • To strive to end up with a bigger piece of the
    pie than the other party
  • Relationship Outcomes
  • To negotiate in a manner designed primarily to
    maintain good relations between the parties
  • Desired irrespective of the substantive result

29
Mastenbroeks Model to Increase Negotiating
Effectiveness Key Activities
  1. Obtaining substantial results
  2. Influencing the balance of power
  3. Promoting a constructive climate
  4. Obtaining procedural flexibility

30
Using Third-Party Negotiations
31
Negotiating Globally
  • Negotiating with individuals from different
    countries and cultures poses a number of issues
  • Showing knowledge about a persons culture is one
    way to establish rapport and respect with another
    negotiator

32
Suggestions to Improve Negotiations(1 of 2)
  1. Begin the bargaining with a positive overture and
    then reciprocate the opponents concessions
  2. Concentrate on the negotiation issues and the
    situational factors, not on the opponent or his
    or her characteristics
  3. Look below the surface of your opponents
    bargaining and try to determine his or her
    strategy

33
Suggestions to Improve Negotiations(2 of 2)
  1. Do not allow accountability to your constituents
    or surveillance by them to spawn competitive
    bargaining
  2. If you have power in a negotiation, use it to
    guide the opponent toward an agreement
  3. Be open to accepting third-party assistance
  4. In a negotiation, attend to the environment and
    be aware that the opponents behavior and power
    are altered by it
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com