Forest and land tenure policies: constraint to participatory tree domestication? Cases from forest zones in Cameroon P. 1Mbile, L. Z 1Tchoundjeu, C 2Njebet, P 3Pa - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Forest and land tenure policies: constraint to participatory tree domestication? Cases from forest zones in Cameroon P. 1Mbile, L. Z 1Tchoundjeu, C 2Njebet, P 3Pa

Description:

Understanding around tree-based systems in parts of Cameroon has undergone 3 main ... in a coalition of research, conservation and civil society advocacy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: SKe60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Forest and land tenure policies: constraint to participatory tree domestication? Cases from forest zones in Cameroon P. 1Mbile, L. Z 1Tchoundjeu, C 2Njebet, P 3Pa


1
Forest and land tenure policies constraint to
participatory tree domestication?Cases from
forest zones in CameroonP. 1Mbile, L. Z
1Tchoundjeu, C 2Njebet, P 3Paah, D 4Okon, O
5Mambo, R 6Oyono, A 1Degrande T 1sado
  • World Congress of Agroforestry 2009
    Nairobi - Kenya, 23-28 August

2
Participatory Tree domestication (PTD)
  • Tree domestication can refer to continuous farmer
    selection and cultivation of trees over many
    years or via deliberate breeding and can occur at
    all stages of improvement from the wild to the
    genetically modified.
  • Sustained supply of products from both planted
    trees and naturally growing stocks entering into
    markets legitimately (without harassment) and
    with secure, recognized chains of custody
    protected by statutory law,
  • In ICRAFs West and Central Africa programme PTD
    remains an iterative process involving client
    preferences to bring diverse indigenous trees
    into wider cultivation, marketing and cultivation

3
Understanding around tree-based systems in parts
of Cameroon has undergone 3 main dynamics
  1. Minchon De Foresta, 1997 Minchon 1986, 1983
    Iskandar, 1980 Wersum, 1997, have attempted to
    conceive Agroforests based on multi-strata forest
    perspectives
  2. Some analyses of cash crop systems, around
    rubber, oil palm and cashew Agroforestry, cocoa,
    coffee have been variously reported by (Duguma,
    1998, Gokowski et al, 2004, Sonwa, 2004, Mbile et
    al, 2006, etc), can be noted
  3. More recently with participatory tree
    domestication (PTD), we note works by Leakey
    Tomich (1996), Leakey Izac (1996), Ladipo et
    al, (1996), J.C. Okafor (1992), Tchoundjeu et al.
    (2002), Simons Leakey (2004).

4
Invariably, all these analyses make similar
assumptions for success..
  • Key amongst these are that, Agroforest
    development requires.
  • Unrestricted access to land to plant/mainatin
    trees with enforceable long-term ownership and
    management rights strong enough to exclude
    intruders and facilitate business agreements with
    choice partners
  • A supporting policy environment sensitive to
    constraints in customary law, and to new
    proposals to strengthen local ownership,
    performance and continued protection for use and
    trade rights to diverse tree products

5
There is however some mismatches between
customary perceptions and the modern State.
6
Customary statutory law harmony presents some
challenges .
7
Nationally gt2,638 villages exist within 4 km of
PFE Estimated Agroforestry zones around these
communities stands at 6.3 million hectares. By
end of 2008, 621,245 hectares of forests (9.8 of
AFZ) came under community forest titles
8
Stakeholder engagements to influence policy
review now seems the only plausible course of
action to remedy the situation
  • But we know that this requires participation
    incidentally, the Achilles heel of policy
  • However, political science teaches us a few
    theories, some of which we are using in a
    coalition of research, conservation and civil
    society advocacy in Cameroon.

9
The phases of resistance and acquiescence by
society/policy makers to scientific information
Confidence
Adapted from Bradshaw, GA and JG Borchers. 2000
10
Linking scientific knowledge to policy action
via different scales
Functions/Actors
Decisions/actions
Information
Interpretation
Knowlegde
DECIOSION-MAKERS
MANAGERS
ANALYSTS
SCIENTISTS
Regional
National
Scale
Sub-national
Community
Household
Cash Moser, 2000
11
Introductionforest zoning plan
laws
interests
needs
symbolisms
Constitution
agendas
forest policy
12
2. Methods
  • Data
  • Interviews
  • Documentation
  • Com. Mapping
  • GIS analyses
  • Public events

Issues alliances 1National Parks (Korup, DJA,
Campo Maan. (..WWF, CED, FPP, PERAD) 2a Agro
industry (CDC, Socaplam) (MCP, NCI, CIL, CARPE,
CED, FPP) 2b BLCC, (BLCC, CDC) 3a Timber
concession, private sector, (CamEco,
Consultants) 3b Forest reserves, timber
concession and each other (CamEco, Consultants)
4abPygmy and Bantu people with national parks
and timber concessions and with each other (CED,
FPP, PERAD)
1
2
3
4
13
3 Conceptual framework
  • Concentual framework focus  rule of law
  • Constitution The broad principles of governance
  • Policies The philosophical and methodological
    frameworks
  • Laws The substantive element or fixed rules or
    by-laws
  • to ensure the well-being of every citizen
    without discrimination raise living standards
    and uphold their right to development. Within the
    possibilities of her resources the State will
    provide conditions necessary for human
    development. (Constitution of the Republic of
    Cameroon, 1996)
  • Dicey, (1982) substantive aspects of law (the
    rules) shape public behaviour (F. A. Hayek
    (1994)
  • Shen (2000) fixed rules to be implemented as
    formal or procedural justice
  • Schauer (1988) transparency, participation,
    fairness and procedure provides guarantees that
    fixed rules will possess the substantive
    element and shape public behaviour.

14
3 Analyses../ case 1
  • 1.Korup 100 park is customary, State attempts
    to resettle villages, fails. Park people. Persona
    non grata. Deadlock. Proposals being made to
    incorporate peoples needs in management plan.

15
3 Analyses../ case 2
  • 2a.Boa plains Peoplea lands intersect with CDC
    lands. Lands retro-ceded (people have a bad
    deals).

16
3 Analyses../ case 3
  • 2b.BLCC Case legitimacy validated by AU CHPR.
    Government challenges on procedure. AU CHPR
    advices on local, sovereign solution.

17
3 Analyses../ case 4
3a.Ngonga-Kopongo Local peoples case strong.
Government concedes, promises encalves. Then
retracts following submission by private sector
company. Deadlock
18
3 Analyses../ case 5
3b.Kienke local case strong, conflicts between
peoples, with state reserve. Government concedes
to timber concesssion, symbolically recognizes
peoples. legitimate needs. But seems to be
turning the other way in finding permanent
solution
19
3 Analyses../ case 6
  • 3c.Socapalm/Hevecam/Campo Racial minority
    rights acknowledged but none territorial
    occupancy of space presents problems. WWF
    incorporates these peoplesuse rights into park
    management with State blessing. Process is far
    from satisfactory.

20
3 Analyses../ case 7
  • 4ab. Southeast Mainly minority rights
    acknowledged by park management authorities.
    Peoples hunting zones built intomanagement plans
    in southeast. A temporary solution is found.

21
SYNTHESES
  • A clear patterns
  • Achilles heel of Policy has always been peoples
    participation, so rule of law appropriately
    focusses on that.
  • Partial solutions in all cases have involved
    grouping the problem to reduce the effect of
    disarray.
  • Where authority has been conferred local
    solutions, though requiring moderation are sought
    and appear to work (Boa, Campo, Southeast,
    developing in Korup)
  • Where there is a clash of powerful private or
    public sector interest the State seems
    ambivalent and confused (Kopongo, Boa, BLCC)
  • The State performs badly when dealing directly
    with peoples problems (Korup, Kienke).
  • The State is not creative enough in dealing with
    unusual challenges like integrating racially
    unique lifelstyles into popular processes (Campo,
    Dja, Southeast).
  • The state avoids public embarrassement at all
    costs (BLCC)

22
  • Our coalition is currently involved in the
    process of the revision of the 1994 Forest ad
    Wildlife Laws of Cameroon
  • Asante
  • Thank you for your attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com